RE: Worth a read.2 Oct 2022 10:35
I'd suggest calamari it's because they deserve to be attacked based on their own behaviour.
Examples , twisting what shareholders have said to undermine them, been unable to post a balanced view but instead an overly negative one, infiltrating private shareholders groups by faking a holding to gain entry and then twisting the reality of what is been posted, making up fake reasons for posting and then two years later still posting , generally being really dodgy characters , trolling relentlessly in an attempt to wind people up, deliberately plotting to get real shareholders banned ect etc..