Member Info for Luckybob23

Ah , I see divvyup, makes sense, thanks !

Surely it doesn't matter if the funds come from liquidity pools or banks or private high wealth individuals, they all get a percentage as the funder .

Or are you saying liquidity pools typically expect a higher profit than other funding routes?

Nothing really to discuss, rather silence than the same copy paste RNS apam or detractor nonsense.

Says it on every rns

Emerson, I don't think the elsewhere is from centrifuge, I think that's an avenue they are exploring.

I think that was the link someone posted months back where they were scoring syme for funding pools and AZs conversation was on there

It's early Sunday morning

Oh yeah, there it is again..

The "it's your fault for thinking things stated would happen in the time frame we were told"

What do you think a legal team can do about an anonymous poster saying forget about the gold..

He's not doing anything illegal.

Think you give him far too much credit, nobody in their right mind is taking his advice and everyone reading can see its just throw away posts with zero understanding.

I agree , report it so it doesn't clutter the board.
But honestly his posts and the SP are in no way related. He has zero influence

My thoughts exactly futuresbright

Why does this mean we must be live by tradition funding?

Don't you think that would be in an RNS considering the importance of it.

What's the real picture then 1968?

Say your bit.

I'd say Ukraines impact is down to cost of living rising , inflation, mortgages ect.

Compare that to a couple of years ago when suddenly a whole nation of gamblers took to trading on aim, due to lock down and literally been payed to stay home which boosted the whole market .

We couldn't be further away from those days now, it takes buying to shift the sp and people are being generally more cautious.

At the end if the day we took a massive hit in sentiment with all the delays waiting for the core sample, which was no fault of George's .

As far as the new addition to the team, we may well be far away from being a working mine but the company planned to use the waste tip to minimise further dilution and thus needing to have avenues for that gold, it's important we get the best price we can for what we can and so rather than calling it premature, I'd say its rather prudent.

The PR is for funders and business , not to increase the share price.
When they show evidence outside of vechain funds to back their client figures then we'll likely see more buying.

Let's just report the lemon and his nonsense threads will be removed.

It's literally just playground level trolling
Sorry for responding, I should know better.

Get the right vape with the right nicotine level Deacs .

I stopped smoking when I hit 40, bought a vape and not had or wanted a cigarette for 4 years.
I always said I'd stop at 30 but when I got there I still enjoyed the vice so I never tried until I was ready.

Hard to handle.. it's been held up by spoofing for months , not held back.

Why should it be any higher than it is in your opinion?

It's both multiple buys and sells who's price match to make a UT

Nobby , 23 million sold by 10am.
How has that got any relevance to anything apart from trying to paint a negative picture?

Also it's not been an echo chamber at all, we've discussed more in the last few weeks than the last few years. Reasonable people have brought up Reasonable concerns.

It's you and your ilk that's stopped proper conversation for the kast few years by polluting this board with the same tripe time and time again.

Time will tell Emerson .
If we get a tr1 .
Or maybe it's just the same big shareholders that have been trading this for the last few years.

"31 December

- a move from the "single transaction" to an Inventory Monetisation programme for the whole of 2021"

Despite at the time people using that statement as a ramp, it was actually the first sign of the funder getting cold feet.
As in, deciding to not put too much cash on the table at any one time.