Member Info for Luckybob23

Market makers keep a float, size depends on how liquid the stock is.

There's zero chance of them expising themselves financially or legally just to help AZ and his cunning plan..

There's literally no need to do so. All they do is read the huge sell order (from LCs, DW, AZ) and match it to the buy orders .

They would be expising themselves financially if they did anything else. Because if P.Is stopped buying they would lose hundreds of thousands of pound and get caught with their pants down.

No need when the standard way of dealing works perfectly fine snd doesn't give them exposure.

So all that was needed was AZ to keep releasing RNSs of "we are going to XYZ" to keep the shares flowing..

Plus several people hyping up those RNSs

And there it is... a perfect plan to shift how ever many shares and never see the stock rise (after initial spike) because the selling always outstrips the demand..

False.

No mention of AZ on companies House.

Any reason you think it might be true?

Buda.. in many cases CEOs will take payment in shares instead..

That's what AZ should do..

But he won't.. because he owns all TAG shares and his own.. making him impossible to outvote.

Desperation to get it past the auditor.

We had zero business.

Tf did, even if it wasn't profitable.

Before that we relied on the DD fees to get us past going concern..

Anyhow, I do agree with both of you on the trading.. difference is I think TAG is the culprit, not loan companies who I think are simply something to hide behind.

I think AZ thought he could make enough money to be his own funder in both IMs and captive bank ect..

As for TW, detractors ect ,Peter, it takes two parties to deramp/ramp in order to trade it..

Surely you have to see that.

Afternoon Micky, if AZ wanted to floor the SP he could of just told the market funders were not convinced.. that would of done the job.

Rather than buying tradeflow.

I personally think we bought tradeflow to get us past the going concern issue.. since we had no business at that time and TF did.

That would also explain the ridiculous price we paid for it out of desperation and the silly introductory fee , again out of desperation

"Lucky, timing 🤣, yes red flags that all pi have been on since late 2020 and more"

Been here at least as long as you.. no PI wanted to acknowledge any of those red flags.

We all shouted them down and shouted libel until late 2022.

Even when we were buying tradeflow all the regulars were trying to justify its stupid valuation..

You keep talking about PI concerns.. it wasn't PI who raised them.. it was detractors..

Meanwhile a group of at least 10 people who've had multiple accounts created fake profiles, fake confession emails, fake pictures of their buys, fake news of their mates in the city, fake articles on every platform, fake reddit accounts to try and get people drawn in to a short squeeze that was never going to happen.

Trolling real investors who say anything negative..

The list goes on mate and you're in the middle of it only opening your eyes to what you want to complain about.. the negative side..

There's two sides of BS and a few PIs stuck in the middle reading it.

Couldn't care less if TW is paid.. he's just the monkey..

"It never ceases to amaze me why the directors of Syme don’t defend themselves and its shareholders from all of this slander"

Because they can't.

Many of the things TW state were red flags were exactly that.

There is no reason for the valuation, we argued otherwise based on expectations set out. But those were not met. Therefore it was never worth the ridiculous valuation (much like tradeflow)

There is no reason to list a company with that many shares apart from the one TW gave.

There is no reason to use the flakey language set out in RNSs , but AZ did.

How were we buying a bank when we had to take CLNs to keep the lights on ?

How is it someone is supposedly filling that bank with 2-8 BILLION!!! ?? Yet we can't scrape together enough for a substantial IM?

Why talk about NASDAQ?

AZ provided TW with all the ammunition he needed and most of what he said was accurate in hindsight.

The blokes a toothless alcoholic creepy criminal but he was still right.

And that's without talking about missed deadlines and suspension that was a direct result of incompetence.

How can AZ stand up in court and claim libel when he would have to prove loss of income..

We don't have an income and certainly that's not because of a toothy dìckhead in Wales.. it's because AZ hasn't fulfilled the expectations he set out to.

A knacker .. ball, testicle, nut, bòllock

Knackers yard.. where you take old or injured animals to be slaughtered

"IF as some say he wants the price then he could achieve that by a downbeat rns, no negative rns so far which pours doubt on him wanting this sp low"

Exactly.. he's had countless opportunities to smash the SP down by just been open and honest.. like saying funders have doubts, we need to jump through more hoops..

Imo he wants the SP to fluctuate. Not be decimated .

AZ bought shares off himself .

Ta Divvyup

Aren't all these transactions just the process of tokens swapping as money is received and payed back ?

Djenks, everything he said was carefully calculated to give a reaction and to give people something to hype up on here, which has been his goal since day one.

A great example of that is saying "we will not be announcing every IM"

So that the same few can say every time interims are due.. "oooh I wonder how many IMs we've done, I wonder how good the results are, AZ has his reputation on the line so I'm sure he's been busy"

We've had that before every accounting date.

Yet everytime, zero IMs and zero extra news was given. Yet they still keep saying it.

If that was you, would you carry on repeating yourself after been wrong 5 times in a row?

My guess is you wouldn't. You'd learn to keep quiet and wait for results, not attempt to build expectations. Least I would, because I wouldn't want to continue embarrassing myself.

Same with the trades.. always someone on one side of the fence saying look at that big buy, someone knows something..

Or the other side of the fence saying " massive sells , someone's getting out"

Both parties conveniently ignoring the other side of the trades because it doesn't suit them.

In my opinion, and it is just opinion, everything AZ has done is so TAG can trade it. All those buys and sells are TAG or AZ with his multiple nominee accounts.

Trading to fund his own business.

And Peter, I'd argue , as I have, that he did understand exactly what the effect of his statements had, not only did he understand, he deliberately went out of his way to do it.. NASDAQ, been a great example.. (I know I keep bring that up, but it's a key give away that he has been deliberate in his attempts to mislead)

😄👏👏👏

But they aren't here every minute of the day.

Anyone with eyes can see that.

You say they have 5 accounts deleting things.

They say we (shareholders) have 5 accounts deleting everything.

The odds are AZ has 5 accounts deleting what suits him.

He never took any action against anyone saying anything when all he had to do was complain to LSE and have their accounts banned.

LSE told me that, I told AZ that a long time ago.

They never bothered doing anything with that information.

I think there's some things we agree on.

Somethings we have vastly different views on.

For what it's worth.

You've spent the last month openly calling AZ scamboni on RTOP.. now your posting about buying more 😂😂😂

Do you know what double standards are?

What TW shorters?

Brass, lex, Rosie, Castle and several more ( the detractors)

Stopped posting over a year ago. Apart from once in a blue moon when someone names them.

Ex and The Analiser are the only ones still post and that's not often and if AZ didn't hand out red flags like its a red flag parade neither of them would have anything to say either.

Your living in the past focusing on the monkey (TW) and his minions instead of the organ grinder (AZ)

When was the last time TW even wrote an article on syme? I don't have access and even if I did I wouldn't give him the satisfaction or reading it.

What are you even quoting me for?

Syme was listed with the amount of shares it had so people who knew no better would think it's cheap.

No reason to list it the way he did.

Rtop was listed at a quid and low liquidity to PIs so he could manipulate it up with tiny buys then offload warrants to his mates to pay his debts off.

Nowhere did I say it was a good buy , just another tactic to shaft people.

There are many things that have happened that you (or anyone) could argue may not of been intentional.

But sorry, the NASDAQ feasibility study was 100% intended to mislead.

Anybody can look up the criteria for listing and see in less than a minute we do not meet any of the criteria.

So then why say such a stupid thing, given he is supposed to be intelligent.

So NO, he intentionally tried to dupe people.

I don't see how anybody can see that any differently.

Oh and BTW, it's a penny share because AZ listed it with billions of shares , he could of listed it with 10million but he wouldn't of had people snapping them up.

Rtop wasn't a penny share, he listed that with a different tactic.

1. My comment was aimed at magpies

2. How can you say there's no evidence of wrong doing?

Did AZ state he was doing a feasibility on listing on NASDAQ?

Yes he did.

He knew full well we met none of the criteria , so why say it.

Also, did we not buy a company that was loss making for a stupid amount of money?

Did we not pay a couple if million to introducers?

On April fools RNS , did AZ not state "shareholders would be happy with the progress"

And then on April first, days later release a load of the same dribble that never came to fruition.

Has AZ not just listed another company with an inflated valuation (5x what it was previously valued at pre listing) and then issued a load of warrants to pay his debts off?

Did he not say there was billions in funding available?

Did he not say the platform was ready ?

Did he not say we were ready?

Did he not say we were in advance negotiation buying a captive bank and then just not say anything contrary for a year until blaming the economy for shelving it?

He said and did all those thing and more Peak.

That's not opinion, it's fact.

He's been winging it for 3 years and instead of been honest about things falling through and why he's just given poor excuses or worse, just said nothing.

No, that was someone entirely different.

They've been back with several profiles since.