Member Info for Luckybob23

Depends on the details.

The idea is its an endorsement and more should follow.. but we've had no such thing in regular IMs so we will see.

Only thing that's going to increase SP is continued evidence of revenue growth

Good question

I'd be surprised if its as good as 1% but honestly don't know, does anyone else?

Embezzlement you mean?

They both have separate parent companies

If you're invested in rtop

Can you name some of the institutional investors on the share register?

"I would add (and I think Peak can confirm) two individuals at the last meeting admitted at the Q and A to investing £1million and £500,000 respectively ."

😂😂😂

Of course they have!!!

Jesus..

And I'm sure they weren't paid plants and they showed proof of their holdings on telegram and they weren't tampered with or just borrowing one of AZs multiple nominee accounts..

You are right.. but I didn't stop Hughes writing a lengthy article trying to make something of the supposed change of opinion.

It's the fact people still help him by sharing his nonsense that bothers me.

He's a lying con man

You mean from Hughes..

Who claims not to be market master.. market maker.. fintech investor.

"No. Az chose not to vote with all his shares as he wanted to see how the shareholders were voting"

Havoc, that makes no sense on multiple levels.

That's like saying he doesn't care about pushing resolutions through, which is daft since they were important decisions.

Plus , if he wanted to see how shareholders vote he could just subtract his vote via simple math.

Also, it's not what they told me in email back in 2021.. they said due to the shares been in costodial accounts sometimes votes didn't go through in time.

So it seems 3 of us have been told different stories..

BTW, I emailed back then because I was sick of hearing the trolls say AZ had disposed of his shares..

The email also said "we can confirm the register has not changed since the previous tr1"

Not that I believe what they say these days, but i did at the time.

An update on WL is imminent, not the deal complete..

Market won't react until its happened. . we've had over 3 years of false promises. . . The market doesn't trust his words, nor should it.

Buy in rumour only works if you trust the rumour.

Syme are monitoring and deleting..

Only other thing I'll say is..

Why does AZ have his holding in multiple nominee accounts?

Because its not normal practice.. there's no reason for it.. ethically, at least.

Did you not see micky1 's links to first major pnp related transaction last week?

It's called price manipulation

And even if it were genuine , the fortunes of rtop are nothing to do with syme.. we are their customer. We pay them for the privileged knowledge of our own ceo..

"Another placing?

Who would buy into this now?

🤔"

Well if they try and raise before an completion of WL they'll struggle to get any takers..

Most definitely dropped now.. but this morning was a 25% spread..

We've had some big sells go through since and spreads tightened a bit

Was just a massive spread

Peak if it all goes south and he doesn't get some deals worth some money then the company won't exist very long and if that happens there will be a lot of angry shareholders .

I've been in this position before and seen court cases been built and it was on far less dubious statements and actions..

But there's two things that stand out as obvious pumps that he can't deny in court if that ever happened.

1. NASDAQ, no reason to talk about it, let alone assess it, as there was zero chance , ZERO..

Now in years to come and with a profitable business then you can talk about it..

But it was nothing more than attempt to sell shares.

2. His pledge to buy shares if the price got to 0.71? Or whatever it was..

There isn't a court in the land that wouldn't see that for what it was. A pump.

Your reasons would not wash mate.. they would laugh at them in court.

Now as for TF valuation, somebody was paid to sign that off and paid millions.

Again, wouldn't stand up in court.

The trading is not speculation , the who is, that's easily sorted out as all records will be requested in court. It's not anonymous.

Then if there's any affiliation with AZ or TAG there will be further investigation.

You can play the devils advocate all you want, but none of it will wash in court.

Every word AZ has ever said he will be held accountable for, questioned and questioned again by people far sharper than him.

Well you're very naive then peak.

Simple as this.

A court case would look at statements made and ask why they were made and what evidence AZ can show to prove any of the things he's stated.. multiple funders, deals been close that never came.

They will ask why statements like NASDAQ were made.

How exactly we were going to buy a bank.

How they came to the valuation the did to list and to buy TF and then they will want to know who signed that off and how they can justify it.

Then, this is the big one, who exactly has been trading this.

Why make loan share deal

Then they will look at all AZs multiple nominee accounts and TAGs and if there's any movement then he will be done for insider trading.

Http://www.theavantgardegroup.it

Some pretty pictures with some lines