The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
An update on WL is imminent, not the deal complete..
Market won't react until its happened. . we've had over 3 years of false promises. . . The market doesn't trust his words, nor should it.
Buy in rumour only works if you trust the rumour.
Syme are monitoring and deleting..
Only other thing I'll say is..
Why does AZ have his holding in multiple nominee accounts?
Because its not normal practice.. there's no reason for it.. ethically, at least.
Did you not see micky1 's links to first major pnp related transaction last week?
It's called price manipulation
And even if it were genuine , the fortunes of rtop are nothing to do with syme.. we are their customer. We pay them for the privileged knowledge of our own ceo..
"Another placing?
Who would buy into this now?
🤔"
Well if they try and raise before an completion of WL they'll struggle to get any takers..
Most definitely dropped now.. but this morning was a 25% spread..
We've had some big sells go through since and spreads tightened a bit
Was just a massive spread
Peak if it all goes south and he doesn't get some deals worth some money then the company won't exist very long and if that happens there will be a lot of angry shareholders .
I've been in this position before and seen court cases been built and it was on far less dubious statements and actions..
But there's two things that stand out as obvious pumps that he can't deny in court if that ever happened.
1. NASDAQ, no reason to talk about it, let alone assess it, as there was zero chance , ZERO..
Now in years to come and with a profitable business then you can talk about it..
But it was nothing more than attempt to sell shares.
2. His pledge to buy shares if the price got to 0.71? Or whatever it was..
There isn't a court in the land that wouldn't see that for what it was. A pump.
Your reasons would not wash mate.. they would laugh at them in court.
Now as for TF valuation, somebody was paid to sign that off and paid millions.
Again, wouldn't stand up in court.
The trading is not speculation , the who is, that's easily sorted out as all records will be requested in court. It's not anonymous.
Then if there's any affiliation with AZ or TAG there will be further investigation.
You can play the devils advocate all you want, but none of it will wash in court.
Every word AZ has ever said he will be held accountable for, questioned and questioned again by people far sharper than him.
Well you're very naive then peak.
Simple as this.
A court case would look at statements made and ask why they were made and what evidence AZ can show to prove any of the things he's stated.. multiple funders, deals been close that never came.
They will ask why statements like NASDAQ were made.
How exactly we were going to buy a bank.
How they came to the valuation the did to list and to buy TF and then they will want to know who signed that off and how they can justify it.
Then, this is the big one, who exactly has been trading this.
Why make loan share deal
Then they will look at all AZs multiple nominee accounts and TAGs and if there's any movement then he will be done for insider trading.
Http://www.theavantgardegroup.it
Some pretty pictures with some lines
He's been here longer than you sausage
Well beds, the price is 0.059 right now, so at least your up if you paid 0.057.
But Never trust anyone with a sales pitch.
I mean generally speaking that's true.. but the article mentions everyone else apart from the tea lady..
You could be right StrangeM.. I'd have to check
Micky, just to be clear .. you think this article is SYME WL?
Because we've not talked about 77million euro, just upto 10m
Micky, it looks to me like someone has beaten us to it.
I say that because the amounts of money in that transaction far outweigh the amount we've been talking about .
However I hope I'm 100% wrong.
Yup, we do agree on somethings, we just have different beliefs as to the why and the who..
Thats probably one of the most interesting things I've seen posted on here Micky
Alternatively..
This has always been about AZ and TAG trading their own company to be their own funder or just to make TAG money..
While taking out loaned shares agreement to camouflage the fact and use as a scapegoat.
Syme losing its start up tag never meant a thing.. why on earth would it?
We bought TF to get us past the auditors.
Because if AZ plan was to drop the SP all he had to do was explain why we hadn't started IMs because funders weren't convinced or because we needed to wait for the right legislation , pegno, something none of us had heard of back then.
A simple bit of honesty would of dropped us like a rock.. so why put us in debt ?
Besides, he could of got us a CLN without buying TF and there's any number of reasons he could of used to do so, if that were his main objective.
Then there's the fact we took a CLN to oay off the CLN.. while telling us they were investors..
He could of just stuck with the first one but they were selling down without regard to the SP.. so we took another CLN who were less aggressive.
So, again, I don't see gow your theory stacks up.
But whatever.. you'll believe what you want .. and I'll believe what I thinks more likely.
I honestly don't know how you've got the bare faced cheek..
You've spent God knows how much of your time since rtop got listed over there calling AZ a scammer and everything else and telling people to sell and nothing will ever happen..
Trying your best to anchor the price down..
Yet here you are ramping a company you said was run by a con man..
And nobody says nothing about it because they're all as dodgy as you and have zero ethics as long as it suits what they want to hear..
😂
It's comical really