Member Info for Luckybob23

Plus they're all at the same times.

He knows this, everyone can see it, but he still tries to paint a false picture of the situation .

Christmas time.. mistletoe and wine..

Con men spinning the same old rhyme.. 🎶 🎵

Just catching up.

I will watch again while wrapping presents later

"some one is not telling the whole truth for whatever reason and I can’t fathom out why people can’t just be honest and say it as it is 🤷‍♂️"

Yeah , there's been people here the whole time I've been invested who seem to be triggered by genuine questions and so afraid of those questions they are prepared to do anything to squash them.

It's very very bizarre.

It's like a hit squad of people who are literally thick as mince attacking anyone they deem a threat.

Specifically the first two years after listing.

The shareholder clearly is stating he took the deal .

I'd be highly suspicious of anybody stating otherwise or trying to twist his choice of words to suggest so.

Because he's very clear about it.

I have no idea if the earlier poster is Jacob or if its some elaborate ruse including a fake LinkedIn profile.

I've seen enough fake accounts, holdings, rumours here to last a lifetime and trust not one person here.

But regardless, i gave the guy the benefit of the doubt and posted the link to the agm and bothered to sit and skim through it to find the correct time so anybody can hear what was said.

It's a ten minute listen , so feel free to do that.

Hospital 😂

Bloody stupid phones

Amar was it?

Could of misheard or misspelt .

Bit, he states" Jacob offered me the deal(the lending out of hospital shares for a loan)

Before that deal happened "

"Since that trigger had been pulled, Jacob owns my shares per say, they are still in my name through Hargreaves, but Jacob can do whatever he likes with then, trade them.."

There was 1 post before it and now there's 19 posts so I'd say it created a conversation rather than silence anything.

Your only concern is removing what doesn't fit your agenda and you've no issue with anything being made up as long as its positive.

Syme have always had the ability to get post removed and have accounts banned.

They simply choose not to do so.

All they have to do is refute the claims and prove they are lies and LSE will remove them.

I know that because I used to email LSE and SYME regularly.

Here

https://youtu.be/3_SNXqh7t3s?si=zXN3MorFQCnZsPM5

Time stamp 1:25 approx

I am not micky1 and I do not have LinkedIn.

But if you want to see the shareholder who says he was introduced to you to borrow money in return for his large stake in Supply@Me capital.

Then go to Supply@Me website and view the annual general meeting in which it is brought up by the shareholder and confirmed by the CEO

21 trades and a 40% spread and it literally says 0.0031 sp.

Are you not embarrassed by your own posts?

Dearest Joanne

I think if one of us isn't invested, you're the most likely candidate!

Funny how you'd rather side with people who make stuff up rather than people who are honest.

#onsymespayroll

#boilerroomemployee

#anysharesyouownweregivenbyaz

Think he's got us confused Mr Green

As well as how much a million shares costs right now.

Not very good with those decimal points these overseas boiler room employee's

Peak, opinions are no valid when they are outright lies.

It literally says in the rns 6 clients have signed a term sheet of letter of intent. And that is symes metric of who counts as clients

Mona, it was over 300m mcap.

1.09 p x 32 billion shares

Rapidly dropped on listing.

Then got pumped up over 0.7p

Peak, a few points.

1. People are doing cartwheels, yet again trying to make something sound better than It is.

Which is why some other people take objection.

2. Who are the many people who said the lights are going out?

Name them. I can think of 1.

3. It's been 5 years in may? And we have 6 clients, 1 IM that's churned 3m of inventory.

1 wl announced in January still not complete.

Given the pipeline has shrunk to 6 customers, 1 is 66% of the total goods to be monetised and given it takes this long to still not get deals done and given there is now zero uk pipeline.. how can you state there is a viable business?

Serious question

I guess they must be talking tinned Tomatoes.

Can't monetise fresh ones .

To be clear, they drag up the price by putting in lots of small buys above the ask .

And the reverse when they looking to drive it down to buy back

"So jacob buys that many does he? I thought he only sold...Which one is it? Too much Savvy..."

Not sure why you'd think that.

He borrows shares to trade them.

That means he and anyone else with enough shares spoof the price up or down so they can buy and sell at better prices.