The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
I don't get why I can't see that
Odd.. can't find it in rns or director deals , you sure that's the right date?
" last time AZ bought £4.25k worth of shares at 0.04 and then it went straight to 0.15"
When was that ?
Don't see any record of az buying at that price or amount
"Re point 1 I would not write it off on basis of not being able to fund our pipeline. IF 2020 funding was genuine then why can't we obtain funding now when we are better prepared in terms on the legal framework,"
That's a big IF but yeah I agree 👍
There's two ways a buy out can go.
1. You set up a business , you take it to profitability and you get bought out by a bigger company for more money.
2. You set up a company but lack the funds to meet your customer base , you sell it for less than the current value.
Sirus minerals was a great example of number 2.
They did all the work to prove the had a valuable asset but grossly underestimated the cost of recovering that asset. After many fund rsisers they sold to angelo American.
My shares were worth 12.5p , we got 5.5p per share.
Since I live close everyone in the surrounding area thought it was a dead cert .. till they shafted us shareholders. Of course the ceo got a huge bonus and the employees all got to keep their jobs.
We don't fall into number 1 since we seem to struggle to fund our own pipeline .
So you want to be careful what you wish for.
As for someone wanting a piece of the pie at our expense.
Well we've got nearly double the shares in issue now a we did back in 2020.
So if that's what it's about they could of just issued 30 billion shares and given them to them outside of the market, saving all the spread and fees snd owned half the company and not bothered with funding from CLNs .
The result would of been far better for the buyer and far better for us.
"I can think of lots of reasons why he should and absolutely no reason why he shouldn't , despite anything he may have said , and on that basis i presume that no further IMs have been concluded"
There are lots, but the number 1 reason is , as ceo its his responsibility to look after shareholders, it's a listed company .
I don't care what he says, that's his job.
So holding back news of IMs is going against that considering the circumstances of all our investments.
But on the otherhand, saying he won't announce them opens the door to the same "I wonder how many IMs the accounts will show" comments that we've heard for the last few years..
Which helps those big traders doesn't it.
Magpies,
Who's been pedantic?
You made a statement that's false.
I posted a direct quote from the internet.
Which is how the stock market works and has always worked. Doesn't matter if its automatic or not.
Market makers have a float for stocks they trade.
Nobody said it was out the goodness of their own heart. They are there to make money and usually succeed.
Technically it's illegal to manipulate the SP but hard to prove and easy to do for some.
Which is why I say price been kept down is nonsense, because I they wanted it low they could very easy knock huge percentage off where we are now.
Yup, they need to complete the WL deal .
Then show that more IMs can be done and done in quick succession, we've had a large pipeline of clients for years. They need servicing.
So far practically peanuts in revenue even with this WL.
But the 100m CH deal should make us a nice chunk..
So roll on more business and prove it can be done fast and not over 6month to a year.
"Market makers hold an inventory of a particular asset. They either sell from this when they receive a buy order, or they add to it when they receive an instruction to sell. This ensures that financial markets can keep moving and that a buyer and a seller can always find someone to trade with"
So no, buys don't always equal sells or the opposite
"I think the selling is not done yet. Whoever is selling at these levels, can only sell once"
Not true, they've been doing it nearly 4 years.
They'll be knocking it down with hundreds of tiny sells below the bid next then buying I back cheaper and repeating it.
Vagabond, good summary and I agree.
Marko and Burnley, cheers 🍻
I'd suggest it's not PIs selling off on news
Vagabond.
The saying "buy on rumour sell on news"
Exists because that's what happens.
Check the trades day before the rns if its possible.
Multiple 30m buys and multiple buys of 17+m all identical.
Insider knowledge.
Then there's the fact of the warrants recently sold off to a third party.
"You mean to say lse figures are manipulated? Be careful what you post. "
I didnt say they were been manipulated, i said the reporting of trades on here is not accurate and thats known.
" Went on L2 and indeed there is 32 million buy and 146 mil shares traded. Its for all to see so I wouldn't believe you. "
Do t care if you do, i stated a well known fact, thats all.
You hust said you checked level 2, i havent, you dont state buys or sells just volume.. so no idea why your bringjng it up.
"And why are you always negative when you are not invested?"
Why would you think I'm not invested?
Because i argue with some nonsense thats clearly lies?
Been here since 2020.
Check my post history of the only account I've ever had.
Is stating facts been negative?
Vagabond, it's a well known fact those figures are not in any way accurate.
They are the best guess of a poor reporting system.
Ben
You can't open a spreadbet either direction for syme with cmc trading or plus500. Since I've just set up accounts to check.
So if you've got proof you can short syme anywhere else post it.
Show me a post where I side with THEM jonah?
Or even communicate with them, apart from telling ex not to make an assumption the other day.
You haven't been able to open a short against syme since 2021.
But you keep making stuff up Ben..
Just shows how weak of character and afraid of the truth you are
To be fair Ben, only brass , Castle or Rosie said those things.
I think you well know savvy list are not all the same person, since its blindingly obvious , none of them sound anything like each other.
But you keep spinning the same story fella, you and your little mates.
It suits your agenda to say everyone is the same account.
Ironically there's one person here who's had multiple accounts and claimed not to be the same person while pushing the same story word for word.
Truth of it is, its him, you and your little gang that's paid to distract on here.
The are of misdirection.. quick everyone look at the loan shares.. while AZ slides some big trades in through TAG.
You lot are trying awful hhardtop sell your story while a couple of others are trying real hard to hype every deadline