Member Info for Luckybob23

The strategic plan that syme hasn't even mentioned?

The one that you've invented? Where syme, the company that hasn't been able to monetise much more than a few quid are going to monetise the world's military supply needs for companies that don't have working capital problems because they get paid quickly in the first place.

That strategic plan?

And you're calling people desperate 😂

Haha, definitely OB 😂

It's a bit odd to praise Porky for his honesty while condemning RAMPERS, when Porky was the biggest ramper this board ever saw... by a long long way.

Or do you have a really really short memory?

I believe you.. many wouldn't

He's not stupid Steve, he's selling a story, a story he knows is nonsense, but wants other people to buy.

Can you lists some companies on AIM that didn't get listed to raise money?

Just the way you're going on about it it's as if we don't know how it works.

If the government is backing suppliers with loans.

Wtf are they going to use SYME and cost even more money?

Of course they are 2g..

Just like when people were claiming Barclays, HSBC and every other high street bank were institutional investors in syme.

Yeah Steve, I've had a look on a couple of occasions.

Just folk spewing gibberish with no real argument for why it is a good investment.

Which says exactly what it is.. paid for hype by poorly paid boiler room employees working from a 3rd world country

The idea those posting on stockwits are real investors is comical

How can he be charged you daft lad?

It needs a deep investigation into every bit of news he's forecast and hasn't happened.

Specifically looking at what he has claimed and what evidence he can provide to back those claimed deals up.

That will only happen if the company goes under.

But so far he's forecast much and delivered practically nothing.

So people have the right to question his credibility

2g.

Here's a few facts that you seem to be deliberately ignoring .

AZ had multiple accounts holding his shares.

He stated that numerous times.

AZ gave a large chunk of his holding to other high net worth individuals for money.

Nobody knows who they are or where those shares went.

Syme was founded years before it listed and supposedly performed 2 pilot schemes.

So your argument about how long it takes a business to start gaining traction is invalid.

Not to mention most invested from rns information about €300m deals weeks away from being complete and sharia funding been given the green light.

DW held a large shareholding, which he was given and allowed to sell down using the overvalued company and AZ announcements.

Because DW was owed money by AZ and that's how he got some of it.

The valuation was based on the pipeline of clients, the funders falling over each other to fund them and true sale been bullet proof.

The over 1billion in clients was later admitted to been fluff.

The funders never materialised.

The true sale wasn't bullet proof.

That's the Con you are denying.

Yet those are facts.

"Initial Pilot Phase (Q3–Q4 2025):

$10–15M total IM volume.

Fee income for SYME: ~$500K–$750K."

Putting aside the fact you've just gone into BS mode.

How are you coming up with a 500k figure from 10m?

Symes fee is 1.5% - 3%

That's 150k-300k from a 10m deal.

2g2d, If anyone gets charged itl be after the company goes under and AZ has to show evidence of all the business he claimed was imminent, as well as the funding claims he made.

I'm sure we'd all like things to suddenly turn around.

But after all these years most dont believe anything that gets put out via RNS

This whole site is just a pantomime of would be politicians.

Nothing happened!

That's the problem!

2g2d,

I understand the process of IM and how ownership transfers from the manufacturer to the stock company and then back before going to the end user.

So in the case of the military who offer out defense contracts, I can't for the life of me figure out how you think the US military is going to allow ownership of their new batch of F15s to be owned by anyone but them.

Let's not even get into resellers, because that simply wouldn't be possible.

So the US want more defence products.

US manufacturers will make more defence products

So why on earth would they need to IM those product?

They are literally made to order.

Why would the manufacturers throw away money using symes service when they have a guaranteed end client that ordered them in advanced??

Spanner.

The suspension would of been involuntary had they got to 1st may and not volunteered.

You have to think it's deliberate.

I mean it cant be that difficult to produce an annual report on time when they've done practically nothing since the last one.