Member Info for Luckybob23

Bullying 😂😂😂

You've some strange ways of thinking

"As an investor, it is so reassuring that the naysayers feel it necessary to spend much of their days trying to talk down Val. I’m sure if they actually believed their own BS they wouldn’t feel the need to constantly post"

You can apply the same logic to anyone posting long winded essays or any other type of sales pitch..

After all, if people are so confident why does it need you to sell it ?

Can you point to the RNS which says anything about syme monetising defence inventory?

Or anything about the ecosystem of Nuburu-Tekne involving syme, outside of lending them money?

Given how keen AZ is to announce deals and pathways do you not find it odd that he's not mentioned this plot twist and the only person talking about it is you?

The bottom line is this 2G2D,

The business pitched to PIs, clients and funders and how it works was built on false information.

And 95% of all the deals AZ stated were about to complete just vanished without a real explanation.

When the majority here invested, we were weeks away from a €300 IM that was going to kick off this business as a new asset class.

You keep coming back to this idea it takes 5-7 years to prove the business.

You are forgetting syme existed years before listing, in which time they claimed to have run two successful pilot schemes.

You are also forgetting AZ stated on countless occasions that they had multiple funders.

You are also forgetting that the whole business was based on true sale, which AZ reiterated, when questioned, in interviews and at AGMs , was bulletproof.

When in actual fact it wasn't and is no longer used as a term.

Did you not see all his talk about how they'd built a hub just for reselling?

Anyway, the flaw in AZs business is down to ownership of the Inventory and it not being a true sale and not being recognised as such by the clients accountants, meaning it's not any of the things AZ used as USP to sell the concept to investors, client and funders..

It is infact debt and not just debt but debt which is more expensive than standard loans to the Client and provides less interest for the lender.

Are you suggesting all these deals in the pipeline and all these funders were not aware of the business model that AZ was pitching before AZ released RNS announcing these deals were weeks away from completion?

Fully agree.

Lets be honest, if any of these types of people actually had an investment and they were confident in it they wouldn't feel the need to spend all day and night 7 days a week trying desperately to push a sales pitch.

2g2d.

If you stopped making things up, I'd hardly feel the need to post at all.

Your posts are a fictional story, vs actual reality.

You have literally zero morals.

I can tell you what he will say if it makes you feel better.

He's still here, he's still invested, still hopes this will come good despite the negative sentiment and poor situation, but there's not much to say until news.

I have to ask why you'd want his opinion though?

Granted he is polite and respectful , but this was his first investment, followed by forbes, followed by rtop.

"2. DW’s security? That was disclosed. You can read filings — it’s a choice, not a conspiracy. If you think secured lending is evidence of a stitch-up, you might want to avoid, well… the entire corporate finance world."

Meanwhile, in the real world, everybody knows what happened.

Az listed syme at a ridiculous valuation, telling the market all sorts of porkies about clients numbers and funders and the huge business that was about to take place, that was most definitely true sale..

He gave dw a huge amount of shares.. he sold them while AZ carried on putting out information across all platforms about all these deals.

DW made a lot of money.. None of those deals ever happened, the clients were grossly exaggerated, the funding never appeared and true sale turned out to not be true at all..

"Time for MisterGreen to stop roleplaying as a government lawyer and maybe sit this one out.

Your “strong sell” posts might work on some, but they don’t override statute."

Can you show us where he ever said strong sell?

Making things up again 2g2d.. tut tut.

We can all see it you know.

You're a one man bs machine incapable of telling the truth.

Yet there's still nothing, other than you to say syme are going to be monetising military contract companies...

TwoGood2Die

Posts: 6,839

Price: 0.00328

No Opinion

"RE: The rise and rise of SYMEToday 08:58

🔹 AZ is “using” Matteo Ricchebuono? Yeah, because private equity pros with board seats at Luxembourg funds and UBS pedigrees just drop everything to play tag with an AIM microcap CEO. checks out"

play tag with an AIM microcap CEO.

play tag with an AIM microcap CEO.

play tag with an AIM microcap CEO.

AIM microcap CEO

AIM microcap CEO

AIM microcap CEO

AIM microcap CEO

AIM microcap CEO

AIM

AIM

AIM

AIM

And yet here you are making up deals that have never once been mentioned questioning other people's reason for investing based on actual official company news.

I'd suggest you read the rns of the first two years.

Because they are full of deals weeks away from completion, promises of funding in the billions, figures on client numbers which were much later admitted to be fluffed.

None of those things happened and those deals were straight after listing.

It's really not hard to understand why anyone would complain.

It generally helps to ask straight questions, mot leading ones that make assumptions.

Like for example saying that there's no gold in Wales when they've not even reached the area they always intended on getting at yet.

Takes time to make that much cash trading your own company....

I'd imagine most people would want to know..

1. What is happening on site between blasting?

2. Why is blasting not continuous?

3. Why haven't we processed all the waste tip already?

We all understand the delays with dewatering, but since then what's the excuse for so little progress?

If people can't be bothered asking the question, then the right to complain is forfeit.

Well, at least he's predictable

I think if it's a hit it might be enough to remove the going concern issue.

Been that the auditors need to belive there's cash incoming and on time.

But given the constant missing of practically every deadline , I'm not holding my breath.