Member Info for Luckybob23

Behave 😂😂😂

Honestly the rubbish that comes off your finger tips..

Boĺĺocks to having any integrity ey..

See no evil , speak no evil, as long as you make a quid

🙈🙊

Yeah, nobody should bother pointing out the dodgy actions of a con man.

Other people should just ignore past events and take the companies word that what they say is happening or has happened is just true.

They should just have a "punt" and only say positive things so they increase their chance of a profit.

😂😅🐃💩

"A fair few buys"

Erm.. 19?

You said the other day "this will rise on news"

It's never rose on news Harley. The one exception was when AZ pledged to buy more shares if I got to Y price.

It was pumped to a few percent below and he didn't buy any shares..

Other than that one time it's only ever risen by spoofing and drawing in day traders for 48h.

Not once has good news landed and the price went up.

I know that because I've been invested all that time and unlike the people you are aligning with who all said wrongly over 100 times "imagine when news lands" I leant not to expect anything or try to hype anything..

You'd think if those people were genuine theyd have learned to do the same after the first 5 times they made a fool out of themselves..

Funny they never did learn isn't it.

Harley.

There's a big difference between selling a story to investors (like companies do)

And releasing RNSs claiming to

1. Have multi million euro deals weeks from completion

2. Have 8 billion in funding.

3. Make pledges to buy X if share price reaches Y

4. Be Buying two banks.

Especially when all those things never happen but the ceo says they are still happening for several years.

It's funny because the same people , including AZ used the fact syme doesn't own the inventory as a massive plus and was infact part of the business model.. but now the opposite is the supposed solution..

Whatever!

Merry Christmas OB

Even when he was Vals biggest ramper?

That's weird.

That's an error with lse I think.

As theres other companies with repeated rns out today

You understand if someone buys us out we won't even get a fraction of the price it is now?

Regardless of my lack of trust in the ceo , still would like to thank You and those of you who attended and asked questions on behalf of all us shareholders.

Why repost what's just a nonsense salespitch from an individual without morals who probably paid to keep spinning more yarns?

People can try and white wash over the past all they like. To say it's not relevant when the claims made have been shown to be false , its mental.

You can blame greed or whatever.. the idea is you do your research and take a gamble.

But if your research is based on things that weren't true then it's simply a con.

2 pilot schemes completed proving the business model.

Weeks away from €300 million IM being completed.

True sale bullet proof and signed off by big 4.

Buying a bank and have 2-8bn in funding.

Funders queuing up to fund the 1.2bn of clients syme claimed to have .

It's called lying, unless he can show real proof of any of it.

As far as I'm concerned, your just another spin doctor.

This site is riddle with them.

It really comes down to one thing.

Why spend a single penny to listen to someone you don't believe will tell the truth , either now or ever.

You either think someone is a liar or you don't.

I'm 100% confident he's a liar.

Already said ..

Why would I take a day off work , spend money on a train fare, spend more than half a day travelling, to sit there and listen to someone lie to my face?

I used to watch it live online, but I won't have time to do that this year, so I'll watch it after work, just for laughs to be honest, to watch AZs BS excuses.

People can say what they want about me, I know what I've got in my isa and I know how much I've lost due to AZs false representation of this company.

But anyone denying what I said yesterday is factual is simply not a real shareholder.

It's that simple.

What part of syme is not regulated by the FCA don't you understand.

Tell you what, write to them and ask them.

I'm not inventing anything.

AZ was accused of selling a business that didn't hold up to accountancy standards, he was asked many many times about true sake. He stated on interviews when questioned on that very question "true sale is bulletproof ", he said that multiple times, he said one of the big 4 have confirmed it, wouldn't name which one. Yet a few years later he's had to acknowledge it wasn't bulletproof and has been totally removed from the whole business.

The valuations on syme in the prospectus are based upon figures of clients and potential market , it took him over 3 years to admit that those clients were not clients at all, they were companies that they'd pitched to.

The accounts show that the company who valued syme were paid a very large fee for doing so, the entire pipeline was fictional.

This is all public information.

I never even mention the loan shares or Jacob.

It's savvy that's obsessed with them.

But regardless, AZ still gave 3 companies billions of shares for a loan he never used which disappeared.

AZ also announced he would buy syme shares, from himself , if the price got to X by Y , why would a CEO do that? When he could of bought at a fraction of the cost?

Provide any logical reason other than to spike the price. You can't, because there isn't one.

Interestingly though, the price went up to a fraction lower than X and so AZ didn't buy those pledged shares.

But billions were sold in the run up to that, which was exactly why he made that pledge , so his mate DW could get out and AZ had paid some of his debts.

Again, it's all there , in black and white.

Why did AZ list the company at such a crazy price, and then divide it into billions of shares to make those shares cheap , if not to make it more attractive to his target audience?

If he wanted serious investors he would of divided the company into millions, not billions, but he didn't want people who would question things, he wanted mugs to believe his inflated fictional figures to keep buying.

The fca are not involved or interested because it's not their remit.

Ask any of the people who've reported it. Me included.

They just say it's not their business because syme is not regulated.

I don't know who you were before, but the reality is the only people who are hopefully are either utterly naive or are pretending to be so.

If you have to worm your way onto the board of another company to give your other company business it's literally an admission there's no interest in the business model, which was based on true sale and doesn't work.

AZ is borrowing from Peter to pay paul, to lend to Dave to pay off steve.. it's just nonsense.

If you were real and not just here to make out AZ is not to blame for a total misrepresentation of what this company is, was and ever could have been, then you'd be saying the same thing.

It was valued at a stupid valuation, based on fake custom that never existed using a flawed business model that doesn't pass the accountancy standards and everyone involved has been paid large sums of money to back up the lies.

Try reading the prospectus, read all the accounts , it's all there.. huge chunks to get someone to agree to the valuation of syme, the valuation of tradeflow (AZs college mates) , exactly the same with rtop, paid to sign off a bogus valuation so they could list it and pay off debts while selling a story of an imaginary business with assets that have been valued at xyz because .. guess what, they paid someone huge sums of money to get someone to agree to the stupid valuation.

If it does happen, then everything will come out in the wash .

"Look forward to your questions to the BOD on Thursday Investigator. The one time you can ask for answers in a meaningful way."

What?

You don't ask a liar to give you an honest answer.

I'll tell you why he doesn't give up on syme.

1. It's a trading platform, the same as rtop and buru.

2. If he turns the light out he will have to prove every claim of business he's published, from imas to the captive bank and the funding he claimed to have. He now has to make it look like it's a business, which he's doing by getting involved in other failing businesses and using them as clients. Meanwhile, everyone who he owes money to is trading the algorithms automatically to claw back their money.

There isn't a real business, the whole is concept from the beginning was flawed. Hence why we are where we are.

People don't take a company to court while it's still operating.

All that happens afterwards,

Lse isn't showing trades on anything by the look of it.

I believe there's 4 trades 😅 when checking other sites

There's 25 trades and a 15% spread.

What are you talking about?