Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Old

''limited financial experience''

I held a high level position at HSBC for many years

you are totally out of your depth when it comes to investments - you were unable to see the obvious

Rip

''or its a sign going lower'

loads of shares being sold at about 1.66p

That is loss making and also has no revenue should be trading at a good discount to tnav not a premium

Old

''moneylaundering ''

you have totally lost the plot and make up things up as you go along - pathetic

The placing at 2p was announced on the 4th December, with the previous closing price at 3.4p

Anx

''Metals One (MET1) forecasts vary''

ffs - wake up, -the share price is at under 2p and under 2p for a reason. There are NO mining revenues/profits on which to base a valuation - gamblers can enter an exchange for 'hope' or 'no hope' shares at whatever price they decide is acceptable to them.

ONB

''I could beat the market makers in their manipulation.''

Once again making up a narrative to suit your own inadequacies

'' my exposure is peanuts and if my 100,000 shares at an average under 3.3p ''

Yet again more fabrications - you state an ever differing lower price each time

''Now for the third time, why would people put £4.4m into the company at 2p with no sweeteners unless they WANTED a market they could sell into at a loss to wash the cash?''

Can you not read - and yet another nonsense narrative.

'' money laundering?''

you have lost the plot

Onb

''why anyone would take up the placing''

you must be brain dead already - the placing was at a large discount to the share price at the time. This time without scam articles the market then reacted as it should have done when the news that many hundreds of millions of shares could be issued at 2p via warrants. It was obvious from the outset that the share valuation should have remained very low instead of being pumped up beyond 50p by stupid gamblers who had no understanding, as you yourself didn't when paying hundreds of percentage points above tnav. Own your ill thought out mistakes

Onb

you are once again digging a whole new hole for yourself as you had previously done. You do not like your own failures in determining the worth or lack of in Met1 and so once again you regurgitate the same narratives as an explanation as to how you came to be so wrong. You have been WRONG every step of the way - own it

Onb

Don't start - you are clueless - market makers are not interested in taking a position for their own account in met1 gamblers investment company, which is why they have never shown up on a shareholder list . Understand - they are happy getting a large percentage spread differential each and every day. I have been proved correct about Met1 and you have been lacking with your knowledge, having gambled at hundreds of percentage points above tnav. Never too late for you to learn in your limited future. If someone wants a gamble, then better to do so at no more than at tnav or preferably at a substantial discount to a decreasing tnav per share .

The only thing that gamblers can hang onto is if one of Met1 investment companies number of wagers in other businesses produces any kind of eventual return, and before yet more money is needed to keep things floating along for the benefit of the few people sucking money out of the company in the form of salaries - money for old rope.

Reached today to continue the impressive upward trend

Bow

don't be a dumbass - A market maker would provide a certain level of liquidity - it is up to gamblers at what price they wish to buy or sell at. Gamblers are currently selling loads of shares at about 1.78p giving market makers plenty of shares to then sell on to other gamblers fat about 1.86

Is currently at a little over 2 million so far today - hardly going to move the share price dial when there are now over a BILLION shares in issue.

Anx

you have lost the plot. The only people controlling the share price are gamblers who own most of the company.

It should be no surprise to see the share price where it is.

I cannot see a reason why the price should trade at a premium with an investment company that makes no profits or revenue.

My proper mining investment BRWM is now up 40% since my purchase 4 months ago, with which I would receive a good dividend yield as well. BRMW is not trading at a premium.

Retail investors own a very small percentage of Paypoint-maybe that is why HSBC took them off of their list of stocks that could be bought in their nominee account - until I complained.

Anyway that would mean that institutions would mainly be the ones that would be selling to the buyback programmes in the coming years. The question is how low a price are they willing to let go of shares at, and has it already been reached or nearly.

Currently near a 5 year low. I would most likely be willing to purchase more at a lower level to bolster the retail shareholder base.

DCB

''Hartley, why are you posting on this forum?''

dcb the Irish gypsy who has had about 130 id.s on this board ,and not a single post made using all the previous ids, that mentioned Lloyds with many thousands of posts made.

dcb why are you posting here? - you are not and never have been a Lloyds shareholder, and that also goes for other stock boards where you have trolled with your current id.

You are living a lie, just in order to get attention - it is pathetic - seek help

Rip

''Topped up 1.85p

Took another gamble .

7% below last weeks placing .''

still trading above a current tnav

I imagine the new placing money is some recycled gamblers money that they gave to ex warrant holders , so they won't be out of pocket no matter what ( a little from their profits).

I would think that the new shareholders would off load at any early opportunity

''Investec Bank plc ("Investec") to conduct the Buyback Programme on its behalf and to make trading decisions under the Buyback Programme independently of PayPoint.

The Buyback Programme will be conducted within certain pre-set parameters''

https://www.paypointbusiness.com/corporate/investor-centre/regulatory-announcements/share-buyback-programme#:~:text=Over%20the%20period%202%2C849%2C507%20ordinary,when%20the%20Buyback%20Programme%20commenced.

Useless

''Not sure why they are not buying atleast 50k shares a day''

any slightly knowledgeable investor would know why - rules and mechanics

Currently for share buybacks for the benefit of shareholders retaining shares for the longer term