Member Info for longtimeinvestor

S123

Not quite sure how you get pleasure out of asking silly questions.

The price per share if/when the shares in issue is down to 50 Billion, possibly in a few years time, would be determined by the valuation the market places on Lloyds at that time. Currently valued at about £33.3 Billion.

With 50 Billion shares and a market valuation of £25 Billion, then the share price would be 50p

IMB reached yet another 5 year high

PAY reached yet another 4 year high

Lloyds at a very attractive price for buybacks

Ant

you must be mentally ill

888

was a step in the right direction, but that would not have been enough - too many arrivals for rwanda to have been able to handle.

They need to be sent back from where they initially came, either directly or via France

888''

''the gang smashing policy needs to step up imo.''

where there is money to be made, there is no such thing as smashing gangs, as others will appear - same as the drug gangs - I believe that illegal drugs are still readily available - even inside prisons, unbelievable.

ALL illegals need to be sent back - simple - that is the ONLY way.

The alternative is an endless amount of new illegals being here for the rest of their lives.

Flec

ffs

'' you're the one who initially brought up buybacks, I just posted some charts ''

Yes because i KNEW the reason for your not worthwhile charts-anti buyback - in the hope of lots of new shares being issued so that you can say 'buyback don't have much effect' - you have admitted the reason you posted them.

There were once about 5 Billion shares as Lloyds TSB and about 72 Billion as LBG - end of.

''when I post the November scores on the door''

An RNS shows shares in issue EVERY month - don't need a post to repeat the figure - people on here are capable of clicking the monthly RNS if they wished to do so.

Without buybacks there would be 76,791,070,544 shares in issue

Flec

shares issued to staff via savings or as part of remuneration are ALWAYS going to happen, and has NOTHING to do with share buybacks.

An RNS shows shares in issue each month.

The benefit of buybacks are the number of shares that have been bought and cancelled which the number of shares in issue does not show.

Without buybacks there would be 76,791,070,544 shares in issue.

S123

''Anyone use Nutmeg?''

Yes, I grind some nutmeg as one of the ingredients in making fresh homemade curry powder.

Flec

''they show a true picture of the effect of share buybacks and block listings combined. Some viewers may appreciate charts showing the periodic effect of the buyback programmes. ''

THAT is my point, it does NOT show the effect of buybacks - you do not want to highlight the benefit of buybacks, it has to be spelt out to you each time.

Anyone can click the monthly RNS to see shares in issue.

Without buybacks there would be 76,791,070,544 shares in issue.

''The only one who raised dividends as a topic, in this thread, is you''

????

Making a record of my trading activity is not irrelevant. It is evidence as a comeback for when you get the usual suspects making fabricated posts

LR

''random list of risers from the FTSE Board.''

you really must learn - NO stocks chosen at random.

Flec

''I don't see anything in my post that's anti buyback''

we have been through this. You have always been anti buyback, and that you first made those posts as a way of devaluing the worth of buybacks (which you had previously not denied) because you have always made the useless point that others have made along the lines ' what is the point of buybacks if they are going to re issue them all again to staff'

I have already said, that shares in issue is shown every month in an rns, for anyone interested, Any shareholder from long standing would know how many shares in issue there once was . Once again, it is the value of buybacks that is important, which as we know,you do not want to highlight because of your anti buyback stance. It has to be repeatably shown to counteract your not worthwhile monthly posts.

shares in issue that anyone can see each month.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/LLOY/total-voting-rights-tr9qw2ok2vri8uk.html

Flec -Without buybacks there would be 76,791,070,544 shares in issue

your anti buyback monthly posts are not really relevant. Shares in issue gets published every month for anyone to see. What is important, is to show the value of buybacks especially those that whinge constantly about them.

Lok

''meaning they can do whatever they wish.''

No, they cannot do whatever they wish. You need a lot more thinking to be done if you thought that elected politicians are in complete control.

Metro bank well up reaching yet another 52 week high

IMB reached another 5 year high

Lloyds valuation getting ever more attractive for share purchases/buybacks

LR

you should always agree with me, but don't worry I may let you know if you post nonsense, if I am not too busy.

Lok

''no answer from you i note''

I have already stated a number of times who I voted for. I do not feel the need to repeat yet again to a complete waste of Lloyds banking group screen space non shareholder disruptor such as yourself.

Ant

do you want another round?

I repeat - I get a train to go to the nearest decent pub because ALL my local pubs have closed down. There are very very few English people left in my area.

Lok

oh dear - you get backed into a corner through embarrassment of your error, and then change 'voted for' to backed

Ant

''now you are moaning about raising the living standard wage FFS, do you want cheap labour or expensive labour?? simple choice.''

Once again your brain is not functioning properly.

in response to -

The cost of a pint is only going to go one way, and that is up, with the burden of increased wages and NI

you said -

''Well, if the numpties in this country never voted for Brexit we would not have this problem, would we''

to which I have replied -

How would being in the EU prevent the Socialists increasing the living wage and increasing employers NI which will impact pub prices.

So IF YOU CAN THINK - where is the moaning about wages? - I stated a FACT

A living wage and NI that a pub will have to pay, is the same no matter where the employee is from. Understand?

''Pubs around me are closing not because of NI contributions, they are closing because they cannot get staff to work in the pubs.''

total ballacks - pubs are closing in certain areas due to the changing demographics .

Lok

if you have paid attention you would know who I voted for in past elections.

lok

''Another Truss/Johnson/Cameron voter.''

as i said, not fired up - how could ANYONE have voted for Liz Truss