R4 news @ 13:00 re testing18 Oct 2020 14:19
Words like - mass testing, millions of tests, 'moonshot' (recognising it might work for a change), antigen, saliva, 'pregnancy style', etc. all mentioned.
Oxford Nanopore mentioned.
Vaccines not 100%.
Not Avacta (or Awacta) though.
Is this about NDA's, or just really poor journalism? Why has AVCT (in any guise, euphemism, etc.) not been mentioned? Or is there a secret code which I haven't got the key for?
Will be all out in the open soon, just hope for a clear message.
GLA