Member Info for Libero

I'm glad to see you bought into MOS and well done for buying in at half the price I originally paid haha! I know I was very negative the other day but, since then, I realised that the sheer size of the placing shows what a high level of confidence institutional investors have for SUMM and that bodes very well. Also, because of the sector it is in, they won't be there for a quick gain. They'll be there long term in the hope it multibags and, judging by the confidence there, it probably will. Having said that I really dislike how private investors like yourself have been the victim of this placing. It's very unfair and so I do feel for you. But, as said above, you'll probably end up in profit. For future reference though - check out Shard Capital because they're stock brokers whose niche is allowing private investors to participate in placings and, in fact, I spoke to someone who worked there recently and he said some PIs were involved in the Summit one. They paid 6.5p + 5% commission (= 6.85p). Just a thought. Did you celebrate Abraham Lincoln's birthday? And how was your weekend mate? :) Kind regards, Dan

That's quite a decline. Just because Tuson resigned, does it really mean he'll be selling his shares? Or has this fallen merely in anticipation that he might? If the latter is true and Tuson then doesn't sell then this a real opportunity to buy. However if he then sells this will fall further.

but it has reported them as all sells. Yet again. It's very irritating. PS - what is a UT type trade mean?

I think that, as we approach the 29 April .london launch date, media articles will appear, hype will build up and this shall rise above 25p. In all honesty I wonder if that's a bit toppy (long term) but short term I really do think this will fly as excitement builds.

It's easy to feel positive when the SP keeps rising. It's when the going gets tough that you have to be positive / stay disciplined. Just thought I'd say because the market is unpredictable and we are dealing with a v volatile stock (which is a double edged sword of course)

Haha Corr what a wonderful life you must lead! Wish I didn't have to work! And oh don't be so modest :) Having a good weekend mate?

...Lately. Last week we broke 65p comfortably. We then held on to those gains and this week and we've now broken 70p. SYQ is a volatile stock so it'll be interesting to see how it performs next week (whether it holds on to the recent gains or not) At the end of the day I not fussed about the short term SP performance because I know that, by the end of the year, we'll be trading 100p + My conservative end of the year target of 144p remains unchanged so it remains a strong buy from me. Kind regards, Dan

I'm ever so sorry I haven't replied to you STILL! I just popped back on here having seen today's RNS where an extra 22.8% shares have been issued. Not great in terms of MC but at least they weren't sold at much of a discount - it suggests you really might be on to something here! Speak to you soon and good luck, Dan

but what is the link between PEBI and PLE and SUMM? SUMM is a share I was tracking until yesterday's huge placing at a huge discount with no explanation, which I thought was criminal! If PEBI is too strongly linked with those shares then would it be fair to suggest the share price deserves to fall here?

Oh wow get you! Do you not have to work for a living? Or are you such a jolly brilliant investor you don't need to? Wait does this mean I'm going to have to read unexpected bits of french for another 3 months from you?! Great.... ;)

Re: Bushveld (BMN) continued Read El1te's well-researched articles on Bushveld. Here are the links: Original El1te Trader article (October). El1te makes a 114% return on his investment after selling at the peak http://www.theel1tetrader.com/2013/10/bushveld-minerals-take-advantage-of.html Not long after he selling he releases this article (December) to say that he has now bought back in at 5.7p http://www.theel1tetrader.com/2013/12/bushveld-minerals-further-positive.html Shareprophets originally said ‘Sell Bushveld’ but recently they dramatically said they were plain wrong and have reversed their ‘Sell’ recommendation to ‘Strong Buy.’ http://www.shareprophets.advfn.com/views/3813/buy-bushveld-minerals-i-was-plain-wrong Re: MOS Mobile Streams was undervalued even before the fall and there was a reason for that you ought to be aware of: the CEO sold three times in a row the day after announcing incredible results. Consequently lots of investors (private and institutions) went off the company because they ended up thinking ‘What’s the point in investing here if the CEO is going to sell as soon as news is out?’ The CEO, Simon Buckingham, sold millions of shares over 2013 and often just dumped it into the market. In October, just as the company was set to reach new highs, it was announced he sold 6m shares, and started the downtrend for 80p to 60-70p as opposed to the 100p+ the company would have reached otherwise. Obviously it looked really bad as well because many people took it at face value and interpreted as a negative when, in actuality, it seems as though the guy was just in love and he sold shares to fund a wedding, a new house, and a new life with his wife. So that’s part the reason why MOS is where it is because, if it was trading above 100p before the recent fall, I doubt it’d be sub 30p now. The other reason is poor investor communications. Instead of boasting about successes and hugely positive developments they stuck them all in the last paragraph of a negative RNS. Again it could have meant the share price was much higher before the fall OR those announcements could have been held back a little further to then help the SP recover / for sentiment to now improve of course. Hahaaha that ‘Covant Garden isn’t a garden at all’ cracked me up! Very good point lol! Although I don’t actually live in London, I just work there. I live in Essex but don’t worry I don’t expect you to know anything about Essex haha! Regards, Dan

Good day Rob, Thanks for providing that information about Servelec. It’s promising to see that George Soros has a stake there and, whilst I’m unfamiliar with the other funds who have a position there (Quantum Funds, Schroders, Henderson) but I also find it encouraging to see such institutional investor support. Re: Bushveld. The company have four mining projects: Iron, Vanadium, Tin, and Coal. Bushveld has a proven resource of 1 billion tons of Iron. A comparison between BMN and its iron peers (like Ironveld or Bao) shows it is undervalued based on that alone, before you even take into account the other projects. The Vanadium is the most exciting project I’d say because Bushveld have the 3rd largest Vanadium resource in the world and the Chinese love it. Due to the fact vanadium makes steel a far better conductor the Chinese government have made it a requirement that all Steel Factories in China must use it so there’s good demand for this rare resource which Bushveld has loads of! The Tin project also adds value in my opinion. Bushveld are the only tin miner on AIM and tin is worth a lot per ton so, even though it’s a much smaller project that the Iron one, it is a highly valued one. Lastly there is the coal project. This one is run through Lemur, a company that Bushveld have recently acquired now that they own 54% of Lemur’s stock. However this is the least exciting play I’d say. The real reason for the acquisition was for Lemur’s $16,000,000 Australian Dollars (about £10m). Mining is usually very risky because there’s huge operating costs. Yet with Bushveld they have found a way to operate much more cheaply and efficiently than other miners so it’s a nice low cost business. However this brings me onto Bushveld’s biggest and only negative: They do not have enough money to truly take advantage of the world class resources they possess. It is the reason they acquired Lemur and it is the reason they’re seeking Joint Partners for their projects. So far they have entered into a MoU with a Fortune 500 Chinese company who are looking to help them develop their Iron project. The other option of course would be to sell one or more of the projects. Again this looks like very promising due to the presence of the Viljeon brothers. Who are the Viljeon brothers? They’re two chaps who set up their own mining company a few years ago, spent $10m proving the resource they had under the ground, and then sold it on for $440m. What a return! If they could get anything close for Bushveld’s four projects us shareholders will become very rich. (see next post)

So I was right about the negative EV - wow I've never seen that before! AND net net This is absurdly cheap. All it'd take is one good year and this would fly! I'm actually quite excited but too tired to research (and having looked at the 5 year chart - I want to) but this is now firmly on my radar. Thanks for the response, jolly :)

Good day to you, Rob. COMS is not a favourite of mine. Nor is it one I hold. I just admire the CEO greatly because he knows how to play the AIM game to perfection - he's a genius when it comes to investor relations. Who else could announce a huge placing equivalent to 17% of the existing shares in issue and do it in a way that the share price doesn't suffer? It's amazing. BMN is my very favourite share. I'm no rainbow chaser, I don't like much risk (therefore avoid resource stocks on the whole), I constantly question investment decisions including my own or even if every man and his dog are invested somewhere because I'm cautious like that. Yet BMN, a tiny mining company, is the biggest stock in my portfolio. Why? Because I truly believe there is a huge margin of safety here and it will re-rate drastically I've the course of time, and that's based on tons of research. I'll give you a more comprehensive answer soon but this really isn't your usual mining company - this ones special and ridiculously undervalued. SERV is not on my radar at all but I'm v interested in it now you said that George Soros is invested there. Will get back to you on that later :) I'm over exposed on MOS as it is so I won't be buying in further but it genuinely is a superb share that is absurdly undervalued at present. Buying in now would be very wise but I know what it's like to not have the funds to do so. I know that feeling all too well haha! Mhmm I'm not surprised you're happy to find such a quiet board to chit chat on. I'm certainly enjoying this three way discussion for sure :) Good luck to all Dan

alphapig, http://www.shareprice.co.uk/SYQ/SYQIC-PLC-ORD-NPV If you follow the chart you'll see that the ones I've said are buys are almost definitely buys because they're are all well above the bid price at those times. Although I have to admit that the 16:24 one is the one trade I was unsure of but I felt it was more likely to be a buy still and so classified it as such. Regardless though how this fell on today's buy to sell ratio and volume is ridiculous.

The columns are as follows by the way: 1st column - buy or sell 2nd column - time of trade 3rd column - number of shares traded at that time 4th column - type of trade (O = normal trade, OK = delayed) 5th column - ignore (used for my formula on excel) 6th column - Monetary value of the shares traded in £££££££s

There have been 14.8 times the number of shares bought compared to those sold and yet we're down today. Please see the B or S I've stuck next to the trades to see what I've judged to be a buy or sell. If you agree with me you'll see that 190,335 SYQ shares have been bought and just 12,877 shares sold. Honestly how are we down? This is criminal! B 16:28:44 69 10,000 O 0.69 6900 B 16:28:44 69 10,000 O 0.69 6900 S 16:27:33 67 10,000 O 0.67 6700 B 16:26:53 69 2,000 O 0.69 1380 S 16:25:49 67 2,877 O 0.67 1928 B 16:24:55 68 10,000 O 0.68 6800 B 15:34:00 69.2 10,000 O 0.692 6920 B 15:26:42 68 5,000 O 0.68 3400 B 13:28:12 69 732 O 0.69 505 B 13:02:38 70 5,000 O 0.7 3500 B 12:39:40 70 1,400 O 0.7 980 B 12:29:36 70 15,000 OK 0.7 10500 B 11:48:59 70.3 9,000 O 0.703 6327 B 11:48:15 70.7 1,905 O 0.707 1347 B 11:34:00 71 10,000 O 0.71 7100 B 11:32:42 71 4,000 O 0.71 2840 B 11:31:23 71.7 1,850 O 0.717 1326 B 11:26:55 71.45 1,800 O 0.7145 1286 B 11:01:57 69.62 47,159 OK 0.6962 32832 B 10:17:45 69.25 13,451 OK 0.6925 9315 B 09:59:23 69 2,500 O 0.69 1725 B 09:40:15 71 5,000 O 0.71 3550 B 09:17:26 69.25 5,487 O 0.6925 3800 B 08:02:51 69.5 10,000 O 0.695 6950 B 08:02:01 69.45 2,601 O 0.6945 1806 B 08:02:01 69.45 5,000 O 0.6945 3473 B 08:02:01 69.45 1,450 O 0.6945 1007

It seems as though shareprice.co.uk reported trades were incorrect due to them, temporarily, posting trades multiple times. Nonetheless over £117,000 worth of SYQ shares have been bought today SO FAR There hasn't been a single sell yet.

10:17:45 69.25 13,451 OK 10:17:45 69.25 13,451 OK 10:17:45 69.25 13,451 OK 10:17:45 69.25 13,451 OK 10:17:45 69.25 13,451 OK Those are all buys and that is £46,574 worth of buys too! Someone is building a stake here perhaps...

http://www.shareprice.co.uk/SYQ/SYQIC-PLC-ORD-NPV Look at that link and then click on trades - every single trade made today has been a buy and yet we're down slightly. 45,000 SYQ shares bought and we're down a bit yet, other days, even a 2,000 shares sold has made the SP drop. Those bloody MMs are playing games here and suppressing the price!