Member Info for lejjb

OMFG
Barstewards indeed.

That shows that somebody's keen though...

What time log please?

The SP is holding very well for low cap standards; presumably the market broadly agrees that the confirmation of that license is pretty much a sure thing with all the company comms / activity of the past 3-4 months...

Rosen did the same work Burford. It’s just financial ambulance chasing and will go nowhere just like before.

https://twitter.com/ft/status/1207756173606359041?s=21

A summary of the accusations and responses, without additional comments.

As always, MW had heavily distorted reality to create panic.

Weren't they closed by the time the response was RNS'd?

It's a PR exercise HeresHopin, it's different from a legal exercise.
And as the name of MuddyWaters indicates, it "muddies the waters". I.e. it mostly seeds doubt rather than make statements in a 100% specific direction. So a response that is full-on will look defensive, however justified that "full-on" response is.
A moderate response that mirrors the "muddying" by MW works better for PR purposes, as the Burford experience has shown us.

The response is well-drafted and free of obscure
language and looks very appropriate. NMC seems to have learnt from Burford’s mistake of sounding too defensive.

Nobody knows, NMC never gave a date of their planned full rebuttal in their last RNS.

You mean, you e-mailed them to ask them to give you price sensitive information?...

Long again at 15.20 too.

BT - for a second I thought you were boasting about how many shares you owned! LOL

mrcarrick - if you do some digging, you will find out that the last spike was triggered by a made-up claim the ADVFN chatboard (a complete cesspit of lies and manipulation as it is not at all moderated, unlike this very BB which is under a minimum of oversight). Somebody stated there that a deal with China was about to be announced, and minutes later the SP started to rise until people realised it was baseless and sold everthing.

AteNRG - read this (it refers to US securities but the mechanics are the same):
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/after-hours-trading-am-i-able-to-trade-at-this-time/
note this point inside that article:
"Risks associated with after-hours trading include less liquidity, wide spreads, more competition from institutional investors, and more volatility."

Mostly no. They are mostly real trades executed after 4.30pm.
Some IIs and a small number of approved entities can place orders after 4.30pm and until 5.30pm-ish. But such "after hours trades" are usually at prices that are wildly above or wildly below the bid / ask that were advertised at 4.30pm.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/NMC/holdings-in-company-bse2q82284djek5.html
(If you look at the "total of both in %", it shows it moved form below 5% to 5.11%.)

Hey BT. Nice to see you dude! Have fun and merry Xmas.

A torrent of buys now, that's highly suspicious...

That surge was due to made-up rumour on ADVFN that a big Chinese deal was imminent.

Yup. But we ain't big enough to fight them, so we have to go along with the (short-term) trends they create...

I hope that Burford will manage to expose Muddy Waters' manipulation of trades like they have been trying to do though.