Member Info for Legalwolf

Yes but no truck. Don’t you get it?

We are still primarily an explorer and early stage. So can’t see us getting stuck anywhere unless our friggin truck breaks down tbh.

I’m now very intrigued to see these £5 million trucks. Do they have their own fast and furious type events where they get paraded?

Wasn’t there a movie back in the day with Sylvester Stallone and trucks or am I imagining that?

🛻 🛻 🛻

These definitely ain’t worth £5 million-no where to put the ore.

All these experts suddenly appearing out of nowhere. We know what the game is and we’re not born yesterday. However we did collectively overlook the need for £5 million trucks😂.

To be fair these antics are all part and parcel of the game. It can only be played at times like this and not when the going is good.

We know the portfolio that we have with OMI. It is unrivalled. So is the shareholder book we have with Sprott etc. OMI has a lot of attention on it - as the trolling also demonstrates - and so it won’t stay at these prices for long.

Once the reversal is in, you are back to the narrative of one MRE in the bag, and a ramp up of exploration in what are very prospective regions. With sellers and weaker hands also out, it will once again be a compelling buy and start to rally once more.

Just hold your noses and watch where you step with these trolls and naysayers. They too will be gone or pipe down when they have had their fill.

Fantastic buying opportunity and I don’t think anyone really thinks OMI will remain at these prices with everything it has coming up.

As for GGP, has it 15 bagged from its lows? I don’t know if it has, so there will also be some envy from some of their holders as to why that AIM darling and producer has been outperformed by an explorer.

Exactly GGP - we can all see that you’ve been doing nothing but propping him up all day, almost acting in concert with him to keep peddling negativity masked as open discussion and debate.

Problem for him (and the rest) is that his research here has been worse than p i s s poor and he’s been trying too hard. It’s all unravelled and no one is taking it seriously anymore.

Might need to bring Tungy back and regurgitate the 5 year LOM stuff.

E1 😂😂😂. Trying so desperately hard to come across as a credible and authoritative voice on here but ending up as a laughing stock. We ain’t buying £5 million trucks. Might buy some £50 million state of the art hypersonic craft though to take the ore to Telfer.

What utter tripe about being holders. If you are holders, then please explain why the investment case has suddenly changed with a 220koz MRE? The sudden negativity and questioning just reeks of bs and fud.

Even though the last two days' candles have been red, there will have been lots of buying during their formation. Smart Money accumulates stock on the way down! They will check the price (i.e. sell) if their buying causes price to move back up but they are not done filling their boots with cheap shares, or think they can shake even more out.

I think the way buys and sells are calculated on here is also flawed and can be misleading!!!

"Some of the ideas being pushed here — that you can extract 1–2Mt of rock tax free and somehow pretend that doesn’t amount to building a mine — are frankly ludicrous."

Why does it matter so much to you if you're NOT invested? Odd behaviour!

And remember, when we do make that move back up - we will know that the sellers and weaker hands are already mostly out now. So it ought to be a much stronger and quicker move back up. The narrative will once more be a positive one - there's nothing like the share price when it comes to sentiment and mood, except that folk will have to pay much higher prices to get back in.

But that's the game!

The situation would be different if we were late into the story, late into the year, and had spent most of the £13 million with mostly dusters to show for it. If we had fallen from say 80p to 40p. You might then reasonably question if we will ever get back to previous heights, question the projects and fear dilution.

But we are in February 2026, have just successfully declared a MRE, and are about to ramp up operations. We are trading at 23p. Only 6p above the placing price.

I have no doubt, esp with the newsflow coming up here this year, that shares at these levels will get taken up very quickly and we will soon be back on our way. All it will take is a very bullish candle on the chart, and/or a bullish RNS, and we'll be on our way once more.

So fill yer boots if you can - as these prices won't be around for long.

There's so many juniors on AIM that you can think of who have much larger MREs - but as BG says - how much gold they have in the ground means zilch unless they have funding to mine it. That's why Pepas is different and so special. It allows us to monetise the gold without having to spend the 5-10 years or find the $100-300 million typically needed to fund these projects into production.

We are playing a different strategy here and Pepas is the key to unlocking it for us.

Effin full of s h i t most of them. Some trying to be subtle but coming unstuck in the process.

Really amateurish attempts but how often do we LTH end up needing to wipe our shoes clean from having to step over this s h i t e?

Newsflash: many of us have been here circa two years. We aren't going to get shaken out when the story has only just started and we have £13 million in the kitty, nor when we have the likes of Sprott, Cohen, Durret, Baron, etc sailing the OMI ship with us. We've seen at least two 50% retracements here already and have the stomach for them.

We know with £13 million and all the activity we have coming up here, that 22p-23p is frankly ridiculous. So why the heck would we do anything other than fill our boots with more shares right now where funds allow!

Simple question: why were all these posters not coming on here and making these erudite points when the share was trading at 40p?

There's a lot more to it than simply comparing size of resources. That's just way too simplistic. As BG said in his tweet today, there's loads of great projects out there but szie of project is not determinative as a differentiator between them.

For example, does this other share of yours have the likes of Sprott, Dynamic, Durrett, Baron as shareholders? If so, fair enough. If not, then why not?

Come on GGP - we have all been around the block long enough to know that EVERY share has its rampers who are in it for a quick 10%-30%. We've had loads here since the rise from the 2s. It hasn't stopped our investments growing in that time. These swingers who then turn into trolls are part and parcel of the market.

What's more important is what the stronger hands are doing. We have a lot of sticky hands here and some very notable big names who are holders - Sprott, Cohen, Durrett, Baron to name but some. By questioning OMI, you (and others) are also questioning their judgments in holding large positions here. They are known to back winners - their records of doing so are outstanding.

Seriously, you all think you're better and more knowledgeable than the aforementioned? Newsflash - you aint, not even remotely close!

"They are historical Legal…I never take these into account..."

Why? That's just non sensical. In that case, all results are historical. It's like me discounting Havieron results from when Newcrest were drilling it. It makes no sense. The gold doesn't disappear simply because it was drilled 3 years ago.

There is NO reason to discount the APTA results by virtue of when they were drilled. Bonkers

Why is there SO much (new) attention all of a sudden trying to talk down the stock, or question the LTHs for their unwavering beliefs. Why not just let us be and head off to a stock that you do believe in?

It's simple - OMI is clearly a newsworthy and attention worthy stock, so even the folk not invested in can't seem to get enough of it. We understand the feeling fellas, so why not just jump on board.

"As for all the other sites, there are still NO assays, which means it’s all hearsay still right now. (Hence the annoying ramping)."

This is totally incorrect. There's been no less than 38000 metres drilled already at APTA with assay results reported. We've also had some assays reported from some earlier drilling at North Pepas. They seen enough in the cores at El P to RNS that they believe they have evidence of a substantial mineralised system. But assays are delayed because they have had to switch labs and/or delay with the lab.

Don't know what your motives are GGP, but you don't seem all that clued up when it comes to OMI.