Member Info for leew

Chasing $4m in the failed Semnet deal, are you ok Chaebol or do you rely on 3rd parties or AI to write for you.

Nothing in the Semnet deal has failed, Semnet is alive and kicking, they are chasing former owners for financial recourse because they can attribute the lose of money to a clause in the deal contract. The Sement deal has not and did not fail.

Jesus, chasing a larger amount of money over a longer time vs a small amount being announced now can be discussed as good or bad but making up generated rubbish makes no sense

Chaebol, one of your guesses might be right one day. The end was going to be in Jan, but the BOD had a plan that prevented that.

1 of GST pillars needs to be successful in 1 country and its market cap explodes.

I suggest letting the news decide where it goes and today’s news was very neutral, given where the SP sat.

Already it’s back to having to pay circa 0.49p for 100k and still won’t quote me for QTYs like why they wil

Quote me for selling.

Let’s see what happens next week, I suspect like before people buying the 0.4’s will be able to sell for a decent % rise in 1-2 weeks

Billy, same trading as last time it hits that SP, people can whitter about news / lack of it / not great, but the potential of GST is huge and when you have that potential and you hit the asset value in terms of market cap back up by published audited accounts it’s a very secure value for investors.

When a day trader comes on saying it will go to X, they don’t even know with X is in terms of market cap hence majority of traders go off sentiment

No,

Go read the accounts that aspect ain’t hard

Chaebol, no legal entity would issue proceedings if there is not the financial mechanisms available to settle the claim (like insurance etc)

To issue official proceedings is relatively cheap ( I am involved in one now) at that point the defendants can decide what to do, which in cases of seeking lost money is mainly negotiate a deal.

Result was not baked in, it was a near term driver so that just gets removed and becomes a longer term target although nice to see what they are going for so that’s a positive and if positive then longer term is better, but like 90% of these cases the legal proceedings are issues and a deal is struck but that will be 6-12 months away at the earliest in my view.

The SP will do its thing with some quick sells and then the won’t be able to buy then it will incorrectly display the spread and then in the end the net effect will be nothing in days.

Same old quoted to buy/sell nonsense as always.

If the trading was catastrophic then I would get quoted to buy more that 75k of shares and not get quoted to sell 1m at over bid.

Fingers crossed Lloyd, would be good to get some more meat on the bones rather than us all trying to join the dots.

Super mouse I thought we cleared this up in August / Sept / October …….. with your constant placing predictions. As I mentioned then we are a listed company and the purpose of that is access to money so one day you will be right but not by careful analysis of when it might happen it is just via your random guess theory you spread across the board when you pop up.

Once a miner is producing they make money, they then use that money to make more money (blue mountain)

This is a great little company and the acquisition has done exactly what it needed to do. Well done BOD, looking forward to 2026 in full

Silver fox, if you are going to analyse GST performance on the shown SP mid I would say don’t bother.

It was up 9% the other day, and -10% today unyet my larger sell quotes are all but static (+\- 5% typically)

The mms are trying to generate a market, their job, but reality is everyone is waiting for the next news and in reality should be waiting higher but it is what it is.i would suggest on the mm point though that the spread loves to Increase in published size as the SP moves on.

Sorry between 50-99k as only check 50 and 100

They have dropped the QTY for a quoted sell to the 1.5m and can only get a quote to buy 50k :)

Someone likes the 0.52-0.55 range for some reason.

Zag, not a terrible idea for sure, last time it was at that low 0.4 value buying in any meaningful QTY was impossible, I think out of what I wanted I had to take 120k shares lol. I have been adding on and off here between 0.5 and 0.56 for a while when other shares do well and will continue that. If it drops to 0.4p I would try and buy a load again, unless news dictates that’s is a poor idea.

Yes the irony is even on my trading holding billy. I can sell 3.8m for more today than I could yesterday, they open up the sells massively below a published 0.55p SP and close the buys.

Hamilton, they will at some stage, sometime funding takes time if you are doing more than a cheap placing for funding. If other companies are raising funding to buy some of our assets and it involves multiple parties the DD takes time and the same on the RTO side.

This is a very small portion of my portfolio and if it takes 6 months extra / 1 year extra but happens I could not careless. I have a couple of Pharma’s and I will stay in them for many many years not a trade.

Therefore more view on hitting a timing date is not really relevant for this.

Wayne, should have brought gold and silver a long time ago, but when low is typically better, then watch it grow for years not days.

Lol, it will need news or a leak of news for a shift either direction I suspect, at 0.6p the sell quite QTY typically drops (500k currently) and the buy also drops (1m currently) but it typically swings into suggesting they want more buys at this SP, where as at 0.525-0.55 it’s normally biased to wanting more sells in bigger volume.

Currently if no changes to volume etc it will probably drop back down to 4-5% in blue today, but the obvious statement is if trading volume alters so will the SP lol, which is why predicting micro movements in a micro stock (I.e. trading is not worth it as you can get qty and the spread makes even decent SP move pointless)