Member Info for Lee1235

Dsflat..possibly. Many people here will say this is for a gold backed currency however my view is this is China preparing for invading Taiwan. They can't offer a gold backed currency if they are the ones with the gold. It would help them get around the USA sanctions etc but will likely cause ww3 in the process.

If they do invade it will cause massive problems with regards to our reliance on Taiwan for chips etc

Fully agree Bamps. A loan will help as it also will reduce the tax burden. Nornally you can deduct the interest from your earnings as its clased as a business expense. Everyone is scared of debt but using it correctly and not over leveraging is the smart way to handle this. Even big tech take on debt despite having massive cash reserves.

Moonhead. How do you know there will be a placing.

Actually I don't care. I looked at your post history and you seem to say that on every share. Looks like you are the Warren of now.

So bore off.

Element1. I posted about this yesterday. They have an alternative fund where they short and long the same stock. Usually 3 times higher long vs short. I think its likely to be that type of hedged bet vs actual shorting. It's only my view but shorting now makes no sense.

This new short may not be a problem.. Apparently they have an alternative way of working. 150 / 50 long and short approach. So maybe they bought roughly 1.5% of shares long and the short is hedge according to their investment principles. Only guess but that's what it sounds like according to their site. They have good returns tbf

Starbright. Great idea but the difference is you have to buy more shares. To short you loan them. Come on. Was that a real suggestion mate?

Wolves90 - its simple. Shorts use algos to basically match any buys with a sell. That stops the price increasing. Or if its short attack and they want to drive the price down, they outnumber the buys with sells. They can pick days to do this - low volume days are perfect. Then it also ends up flushing out other investors if stop losses kick in etc which drives the price even lower. Nothing illegal in it. They are just selling shares they have loaned. Which is BS of course.

Please dont tell me these companies are ethical and would never do it. I have seen the same behavior in many companies however the shorts opened here are low in volume therefore i expect this is some tactical crap to stop the price going high.

9 can you read? You added some 0's to the total put option volumes.

Please also remember the price is in AUD. You probably don't understand its not USD. Ffs

Are you stupid or just malicious?

Freddie. I dint really care how many shares sd added. I think how GGP has played out is exactly how a lot of these exolorers everyone is raving about will succeed or die. I assume you seen the info today that's shows that we have already made more cash than what Telfer and Hav cost? Please enlighten me on how an explorer can do that without raises or debt?

I have no doubt the sp will be much higher over time so i don't care where it is today

Darientaylor just shows what an idiot you are.

20,545 ounces gold delivered in half a year by Serabi which is like 3 weeks delivery for GGP. 18.9 million profit - which is again like a few weeks profit for GGP. I also notice the debt for Serabi . GGP has 0 debt. So give your head a wobble.

Why do idiots come here to ramp other companies? Go on there board.

Could the short be in place to hep the funds by the shares cheaper? Drive the price down slightly to try balance any large purchases.

I dont think they will just not buy shares as they are deemed expensive.

The whole point on indexes is they are re balanced to match the current market. Its not a legal mandate however the funds objectives are to track a market or sector etc and if they dont buy the shares of any new additions then they are going against their funds objective which then means they are open to lawsuits potentially.

Just a thought.

Nine stop been an idiot. If you checked his profile he has been doing that for 2.6 years. So stop with your sly deramping. Always the same story with you. There is water in the ground. Bravo. Its been said here a billion times. Water in mines goes back as far as ancient Egypt. They could deal with it. The Romans dealt with it. So I'm pretty sure in 2025 it's no big deal.

We will be added. Its confirmed on the link MH01 shared

Yes I say you are a clown. Do you understand anything about the comany? I sense not given your very basic look here. More or less all that happened is an 11 per cent reduction which is already offset by the high gold price. So yeah idiots like you coming here to ramp other shares should just bugger off to their boards.

Ripley94. What a tool.

Ripley94 no worries. There has been dilution but my views it's been worth it. Like I said it's allowed the company to turn into one producing cashflow. It has no debts, I think 585 million aud in the bank as of June' which will be growing every single day. I really wouldn't worry about the past but would research the possibilities at Tefler and Hav. That's the main thing now as it's no longer a company that's trying to turn into a producer. If you want to learn about the company I would suggest reading the material from September 24 to now. I feel the price is low vs it's peers and has long as it delivers over the next 2 years then the current price is a bargain.

Ripley 94. Not sure younknowbthe history but the o0% sp drop means little given the fact bmwhen the price increased this was q completely different company. Greatland is now a producer. Back then was an explorer with a find. I would expect most explorers who find gold will have the exact same sp action. I do expect the previous highs will be reached again. Its why I ignore the noise day in day out. We went from 0 revenue annually to over 1.4 billion aud annually more or less overnight. That's not a common happening.

Ben I agree about not rushing with comms. I always feel that comes off as desperate and usually means there is no real substance behind the comms or there really is an hidden crisis. As long as the next update is in-line with forecast I will be happy.

southern comfort behave.

they called out 260 mill investment spend for telfer in fy 26 plus give some of the info on why. read the report word for word and check.

i imagine someone was able to look at the plans where they are drilling and come up with an 800 mill cost assumption. for which 260 is covered in the next financial year as called out in the report. covered by revenue. then in 2027 looks to be slightly higher in this 800 mill number but again covered by revenue according to their updated forecast for 2027. then there are also some one off costs this year, replacing the fleet etc that shouldn't repeat in the next financial years.

did the market expect that there will be 0 cost for expanding the reserves? if anyone did that then they are ******ed

if they are spending that much per year do you think they are doing that for no reason? is this because they like spending money? are they just digging holes so they dont get bored? ffs

if they even increase the reserves in tefler by 500k oz then they will be very profitable, even with a 800 million spend. minus what they already budgeted against expected revenue.

i take it you dont have any type of job that involves revenue or cost clearly. invest to grow. its simple.

Southern Comfort. The problem is no one seems to be accounting for the additional revenue generated by any Capex spend. So in fact we should see cost plus revenue so then it's a fair assessment. As always you take the negative view but actually capex spend is there to generate more revenue.