Member Info for leas

Really? When you thought the Lloy bb could not get anymore pointless, it continues to hit new lows.

Nolupus
Probably Avion. Imo they have shackled IMM and slowed down the progress to the trial. They know that IMM will need further funding to progress any other compounds and delays will result in IMM being a distressed seller.
Not saying that the current MC will be the offer price should this occur but anything triple that would now appear generous.
Throw in a couple of Directors jobs in the mix employed by Avion would be a great incentive!
I’m sure many may think I’m only posting here to buy on the cheap but some LTHs will know I was posting the same at 13p 3 years ago. I was also posting that eventually IMM will run out of money.

Nolupus

That is exactly why I’m not invested. I was posting comments 2 years ago about IMM running out of cash and selling their pipeline in the cheap.
My view hasn’t changed. Imo investors will not reap the rewards of P140 revenue.

CauldStream

IMM do have a track record of selling drugs. Cephalon for example.

Emerald
Do they not hedge forward buy their fuel?

Yes maybe.
Perhaps lie volume exaggerating price movements.

Anyone any ideas why the sp has dropped again

Sushi
No doubt there will be 'radio silence' from IMM after today's news. Unless something comes in 'left of field'. Will those investors buying the dips not sell through boredom? The majority I'm guessing buying now are the 10% and move on lot.
Lets make a judgement mid January.

Looks like my 'IMM bashing' posts are starting to play out. They will be taken out on the cheap. Avion knew that time was never on the side of this company. Those buying at these prices may double or triple their investment but any expectations of the price hitting double figures has long gone.

Trojan
Posted the same at the time. There was other news recently that also imo been worthy of a RNS.
IR should take every opportunity to update it’s shareholders.
I’m guessing when the new CEO arrives then we will get regular updates. Just my opinion, but further institutional investors are sitting on the fence whether to invest further or not when they are confident about direction.

Flash
Cash burn is relevant. What have they got in assets to raise funds? Labs, scientists, admin, list is endless.
The BoDs not taking a salary only confirms my concerns.
I know I’m pi55ing in the wind but all the very best with your investments.

Flash
I think your reasoning is sound as far as Lupuzor is concerned. However, IMM is not a 'one trick pony'. Some posters on here forget that their are other lead compounds under development that require funding. Cash burn, no matter how small is eating into what money is left. Avion only care about one thing, not IMM, not it's shareholders, not even about timescales.
The price of a share today is for a reason. This is not an easy way to make a 10 fold profit. The same rhetoric was being posted at 7p.

Wow, someone sounds desperate to make their 10%. Have you seen the spread? :)

halfbutt
Really sorry to hear that. I can remember our posts and research from many years ago. All well researched and intended to help one another.
Ironically, INM did ok for me as my strategy was always to sell before the P3 readout.
We can only make reasonable measured decisions based on what we are told. My patience with IR ran out prior to Avion coming aboard.
Personally, I saw through ‘jam tomorrow’ promises and decided to avoid.
Lupuzor will get to market but imho not for the benefit of the shareholders that have supported it over the years.

Disgraceful behaviour. Basically slap a profits warning on a company based on ‘what they believe’
What’s the point of IR if RR do not respond.

Without bursting your bubble, I think they were cancelled. See the minus sign and price of execution

In fairness, if ellis has done his own analysis then the sp must be heading that way. I could have fallen off my log when he informed us if a recession and the implications.
Just sold all my pf. Cheers mate for taking care of my financial security and will await further analysis from you when I need to buy back in.

Yet those LSE members posts that are clearly attempting to short this remain. :)

The point is we need coal for the steel. This is not about changing direction on policy to coal powered generation , although short term that may be our only choice until nuclear meets demand capacity.
The SMRs will get built as it is now clear that we have to be self sufficient.
As a footnote and slightly off topic but relevant in relation to our green policy moving forward. I have an EV and a diesel. The current Mrs leas has a petrol vehicle. If you factor in the extra cost of buying an EV my diesel/petrol vehicles are cheaper to run and I’m not replacing the tyres every 10k miles.
The world is mad and any expectations of going zero in the next 30 years is imo unlikely to happen.

Metom
Very eloquent. I live in the county of Lancashire and Cumbria. This is welcome news to the community. Can I point out one or two facts that are missing. The British steel industry needs thus grade if coal to produce the quality of steel that is in demand. If we cannot produce that steel then we have to import it, probably from India.
Our other alternative is to use coal from Russia which of course is not viable at the moment and the carbon footprint to import it is much bigger than home produced.
The mine is not deep and environmental impact is low.