Aaug5929 Nov 2018 18:17
It is a fair question, but I don’t believe the answer is yet a straight yes or no.
Kurt is a miner by trade. He enjoys digging holes and creating a revenue stream. Year after year as CEO of a company which fails to step beyond the exploration stage must be frustrating, to say the least.
However, as CEO, his job is to drive the company forward and make a difference. He has not yet done so, and, increasingly, I believe that is his choice to sit and wait. He has said so in as many words.
That has been proved not to work. It plays into the Swedes’s hands of wringing the resolve out of the company in order for it to become a state asset, via LKAB ownership probably.
In short, too passive. As time passes, and goodness knows far too much has passed already, he should be moving through the gears to apply pressure. Who else is responsible for this course of action. Certainly the SAB, who, since their appointment 3 or more years ago, have been invisible. Kurt appointed them. He should be applying pressure to them too.
The election is a red herring and a feeble excuse which posters on here are clinging to as a reason for the current impasse.
It goes much deeper. Does anyone seriously believe government business has been zero in the past 3 months?
The decision to invest precious cash in Kosovo is, in my view, a shocking decision, unless Kurt has been told a decision is imminent, and even then I would not choose to invest in Kosovo specifically.
Let me ask you a simple yes or no question.
If LKAB owned the exploration licenses at Kallak, do you believe they would have been treated the same as BEM.
There lies the crux of the matter.
If the CEO of the company won’t force the pace, no-one will.