Member Info for lbjj

Well done. You have included the words action and socialism in the same sentence.
The state is everything to the socialist. The more chit chat and kerfuffling they can conjure up, the more smug self satisfaction they enjoy. Awful.
The fact they even have a minister for enterprise and innovation is irony in it’s sickest form.

What a load of waffle. This is the swedes doing the only thing they know how. Pretending to sympathise, accommodate, engage and evolve. How long will they talk about the one stop shop before anything changes?
Why not just adhere to the longstanding, published mining application process. If they had done that, Kallak would be a mine now.
They aren’t proposing changing the law, so, effectively they aren’t proposing anything meaningful.
In any case, BEM’s application withers on the vine of the existing process.

51 days until Kurt’s imaginary deadline.
Baylan would have been unaware of Kallak until the chairman’s grovelling letter arrived on his desk.
I am still astonished that, after 6 years, no established dialogue between the company and the minister’s office was in place? The content and tone of the letter demonstrate there was none.
Why has Kurt not requested a response to the submission of critical information demanded by the government in March 2018?
To all intents and purposes, this was the final step which would facilitate a decision 14 chuffing months ago.
The company is far far too passive. Does Kurt want the concession or not?

Having read the treaty you must revisit the propaganda leaflet conjured up by the tories. Unless you do both, you will not be able to properly assess their duplicity.

Integration implies equality.
Germany calling the shots aided and abetted by France over the other 26 nations is neither integration or equality.
The Germans are not really scared of losing the Uk as a member of the club. What they fear is:
1. The loss of our contribution of 17% of the total EU budget - 100% divided by 28 = 3.5%, by the way.
2. The collapse of the grand plan for a federal state of Europe. One currency, army, Supreme Court etc etc. If one member is seen to make a success of leaving, and we will, then Spain, Italy and even France will come under pressure from their electorate. Potentially game over for the EU.

When you have read every word of the Lisbon Treaty, please revisit the referendum leaflet delivered by the Conservative party before the referendum.
Firstly, the £9m this leaflet cost contravenes election spending rules. No action was taken against the Conservative party. Surprise surprise.
The lies in this document are staggering, but significantly start with the bullet points on the first page, and I quote:
“ the U.K. will not be part of further European political integration “
Please take the time to read all of this leaflet. In hindsight, and with the knowledge of what we have signed up to thanks to the Lisbon Treaty, the lies are even more shocking.

Idealism is the currency of teenagers, in my opinion, and realism seems to me to be a more profitable pursuit for adults.
MPs voted to provide the electorate with an in / out referendum by a majority of 6:1, not because MPs wholeheartedly believe in democracy.
Quite the reverse.
They believed they could corral the electorate into voting to remain.
What MPs should have provided a referendum on was the Lisbon treaty, which surrenders all remaining autonomy still withheld from the EU. Autonomy and freedom which Hitler failed to wrestle from our grasp and which were preserved for, what we expected to be perpetuity at the cost of millions of lives.
The Lisbon treaty is the most pernicious document I have ever read as a resident of the U.K.
Should MPs succeed in dragging out the Brexit process until 2021 ( or engineering it’s cancellation ) when the Lisbon treaty will be enforced, then any potential consequences of Brexit will be dwarfed by the all consuming Uber federation to which we will then be enslaved.
Please read the treaty in full before saying anything more on this subject.

Stupidity is equally distributed amongst remainders and brexiteers.
To infer that your own personal preference was voted down because all the stupid people didn’t agree with you displays it’s own arrogance.

The terms of engagement for the referendum could not have been more straightforward.
A binary in / out question, decided by a simple majority.
Of course, our political leaders both wanted a remain vote, and had 100% confidence in achieving that result.
That’s just routine political arrogance.
Because the electorate didn’t behave as expected, they should not be chastised and dragged to the ballot box in order to get it right next time.
Right for whom?

The referendum result instructed the government to get us out of the EU.There is nothing confusing or terrifying about that.
The fear and confusion has been conjured up by our jobsworth MPs who.
1. Are against Brexit in the majority ( 74% )
2. Incapable of anything other than towing the party line and feathering their own nests.
Their trump card is the progressive dumbing down of the electorate over the past 30/40 years.
Mark Twain famously said “ do you think politicians would allow us to vote if it actually made any difference.”
The cosy political duopoly in the UK, ensures that Mark Twain’s Question is indeed rhetorical.
I would say the chances of the U.K. leaving the EU are about as good as BEM, in it’s current guise, being awarded a mining concession for Kallak.

Relax.
The 482 MPs who voted to remain have it all in hand.
Helped enormously by the venerable BBC, whose anti Brexit bias is a disgrace. All 5 panellists on tonight’s Question Time voted to remain, as did Fiona Bruce.
Day by day, brick by brick an edifice of fear and confusion is being built to justify the ultimate aim of staying in the EU.
Revocation of article 50 is now openly spoken of, both here and in Europe.

Ha Ha!
Absurdity and reality are interchangeable here...

Thank you for overstating my status here.
Never a crusader, merely an observer and commentator...

We have all read that before, Ed. And it is meaningless.
1. This has been true for over 3 years.
2. Kurt has been saying this for all of that time, without effect.
3. The government remain implacable and unresponsive.
Until it is the government speaking meaningfully about a deadline which they commit to keeping to, without any further twists and turns, which neither add nor subtract from their longstanding ability to announce a decision, then the company’s pronouncements are just noise.
Neither positive or negative in your terminology, just noise.

Good morning,
You do continue to lift my eyebrows to unprecedented heights...
“we got a result” and “we’ve done brilliantly”.
Priceless....

Bit early to be drinking, John.
SP hasn’t moved?
On the subject of the SP, I would like people to consider this:
Exactly 8, yes 8 years ago, before Finland and before Kosovo, with CSP at the tiller, drilling suspended due to an administrative cock up by the company, and before even the mining license application was submitted, the SP was double what it is today.
Even if you add a very modest 2% annual inflation to the then price, it would equate to 17p, coincidentally the price it reached before the still unexplained flash crash - another lack of action from BEM.
And Kurt talks about adding shareholder value....

Just back from 3 months in NZ. Wish I’d moved there 30 years ago.
Revisiting my post from mid January before I went, my prediction of no decision on Kallak and a stagnating SP on the sixth anniversary were accurate, despite being derided at the time as negative due to the manufactured euphoria of a “new” government, which turns out to be the same old government.
The news on Kosovo is even worse than I predicted. Two more low priced placings squandered on this ill-judged adventure.
And the Swedish government ( Baylan ), the MI et al still silent.
“ by the summer” is Kurt’s wishful thinking, not the government’s commitment.

I posted exactly the same view a couple of days ago.
Interestingly, 21 june is the week before the agm. If the concession has not been granted by then, I will certainly be attending wherever it is.

Had the two most recent RNS been presented in reverse order, from a PR point of view, if nothing else, how much better a picture would that have seemed.
I am sorry to say this, but the company ( Kurt ) seems to be losing focus.
“ Adding shareholder value “ has been a phrase used more than once by Kurt. Where is the evidence?
The letter to the government was three years overdue. I vehemently disagree with the whole Kosovo investment and particularly the rush to plough cash into it. Even with the most recent cash injection the company owns little more than a third.
I don’t trust the Swedes one bit. Prioritisation of the application is meaningless. Lofven repeatedly stated the application was receiving due attention. Additionally, it is BEM stating “ by the summer “ Had I seen these words coming from Baylan’s own mouth, it would have carried much more weight.
Personally, I would be astonished to see a decision by the end of June 2019.

Funny how new posters are feted as long as they sing to your tune, eh Suzy?