Member Info for Lazarus2

It may be consistent but it is not intelligent not helpful and talking of inconsistent…err… you do swing from negative to positive and back again. You seem to be hedging your bets, maybe awaiting an “I told you so” moment when news eventually breaks. But consistent? No way

Hi Aber - of course we can agree to disagree - it is all about opinions as you say. But with your vitriolic post against Dr Parker and Potnak selling Red flag theories and extolling the virtues of Surfie it smacks of Trader syndrome to me.

That is such an illogical post at this juncture. I get that you are one of the "Parker haters" but you paint him as some sort of machiavellian character who has total control over the rest of the board and the stockbrokers. You are way off beam although I understand your preference but not the reasons behind it.

1. It may show that the BoD are not prepared to be had over and are protecting shareholder interests.

2. The progression of the science and efficacy.

3. Nonsense statement. He does not have total control as you like to portray

4. Valid Point

5. More nonsense. He does not exert that much power over the BoD or the brokers.

We would all like to see a T/O but £500m? I would feel short changed if that were to be the case. Anyway, I suspect that there is an uncommunicated plan being worked through at the moment in respect of next steps and, in particular, a cash raise of some description. I would be disappointed if that wasn't the case. It may be that the silence is golden.

Surely this obsession with Parker is clouding peoples judgement and detracts from the real story here.

Year end results were released 9th October last year with an advisory note released just prior to that. So, even if the data isn’t released on time then the results should be unless they are delayed in order to include an update in the forward looking statement. So plenty to come including a financial update as the cash runway is shortening by the day. Should we have to kick the can further down the road and go it alone then fine - at least we will know where we stand. Unsurprisingly, I trust the BoD

Yep - agree with all of that and it remains the elephant in the room. The market is aware of the downside should a placing requirement materialise so they will want as many shares as possible at the cheapest price possible. I also agree that, if the necessity to go cap in hand to the City becomes unnecessary then the sp will increase significantly. I cannot see that we will not suffer dilution of some description but there is plenty of headway with so few shares in circulation. The exception to that last statement is whether a licence deal or funding of some other description comes in from left field. That would really give us all a lift. Not long to go before Sareums latest road map will become evident.

Evening Potnak - I don’t get your “jam tomorrow” comment - you have already laid out your narrative regarding timelines and hypothesised the different scenarios. Based on that, it is clear that you expect and agree “jam tomorrow” from Sareum. Are you mischief making?

All AIM BoDs suffer the same abuse due to poor valuations and the need to raise funds. This is why the AIM exists. The fund raise goes through a nominated broker and is regulated. Does the City take advantage - you bet it does (10p). 737 is owned by CRUK as the principal party with Sareum merely an interested party and it will state as such in the contracts. I appreciate the dislike for Stephen Parker but I think it is based on misunderstanding of facts.

As for the science being in the wrong hands that is plain nonsense Colbalt. It is in the hands of the very people who developed the science. Once the full data release has been approved and RNSd then Sareum can go forwards. Anyway, follow the news

Gunner, I appreciate your point as to who brought in RF and PH - we do not know what the arrangement was or who ratified it. Irrespective of the answer, the funds raised allowed Sareum to remain independent and to move on. Most here took part and also received cheap shares for their support.

I do not understand your point about "why did they just sit back and watch the sp to drop". I do not know what you think they (The Bod) could have done at that point. They cannot invent stories to please investors, they cannot speculate in a RNS just to please investors, and they certainly could not mislead the market. In some ways, you are highlighting my previous point for me. Directors are tightly controlled by market regulations and the by the law itself and are usually as frustrated as we investors at the treatment dished out by the market makers and brokers. Although the market makers and brokers are regulated, it is with a very light touch and they hold all of the aces. It isn't a level playing field. It is the same as blaming the referee for a home defeat when the real culprits slink off the field of play unscathed.

I think if PH went short then they will want to buy back in as cheaply as possible. Ordinary investors cannot influence the sp as the spivs hold all of the aces. They have so many levers they could operate without volume. Where there is money, there is corruption as has been seen on numerous occasions with LIBOR, insider dealing, washboarding, spoofing, Barings etc: I could go on ad infinitum but it would make not a bit of difference as to how these markets operate. Retail investors will just have to grin and bear it, or, hand over their shares very cheaply to the waiting vultures. Obviously, it is all about individual choices. I find it odd that some blame honest Directors for any sp drop and the MM's, Brokers and Traders get away with murder and very little criticism. Roll on next week!!

….and not the sp shenanigans. Stay defiant, two fingers up to the spivs/traders and follow the news and data outcomes. If good they will all have to change their tunes and close their positions. There will be those attempting to damage the sp and Sareums prospects including certain brokers and traders. All will be revealed quite soon and we move on to the next milestone(s). Until the scientists tell me we are a dead duck I will continue to hold/add. Surfie and Co: haven’t got a clue by their own admissions- follow the news guys. Everything else is immaterial

You are spamming the chatboard with negative drivel and an obvious agenda. As I did, it will rise from the dead - and flourish!

Try to be less obvious with your agenda as it is crass at the moment. Must try harder and write a different script

Of course it is - The City will always have the shirt of our backs. I have bought Sareum at 10p raise (now 28p). GGP last week at 4.8p (now 5.6p) buy when a share is unloved not when loved by everyone. Big opportunity and will deliver handsome rewards for those of us wise enough to take the plunge. Best of luck

Too thick! You missed your vocation and should be a whine merchant

Exactly the point Quant - don’t take any notice of the spivs or their lackeys working overtime here. Look at the market cap and ask if our assets are worth more going forwards. Of course they are. Buy low, sell high or higher. Great opportunity at such a low price.

£60k’s worth of late reported trades been put through. Definitely buys @27p

Yep - all good. A lot of items coming good for end of 2024.

*Spent

Just starting a holiday and spelt night and most of today travelling.Catching up with a disappointing day. Sixth was correct in pointing out that the pipeline chart had been updated for 1801 to show completion. I thought that we may get an update today - sadly not the case.

The spivs will want this down as low as they can get it. Only news will bring the buyers in and in the meantime we will be played. Never mind. I remain defiant and put two fingers up to the spivs and will continue to believe in the Science, the BoD and Sareums eventual success. The naysayers can enjoy their own bile - why they are here god alone knows - strange logic on display at times. Anyway, I remain bullish, logical and, hopefully, consistent with my views. My money, my choice. I stand by that

I should say 1802 in addition to 1801 - if translational studies in 1802 are nearing. Completion or complete, then the 1801 ph1 results will set us on to a very lucrative commercial pathway

It is now staring us in the face and no adverse reported - can’t wait for confirmation and an update on 1802.