Member Info for Layla1

I realise the investment is more about the ability to exploit the resource, but not sure if s.p has touched its new support level.

Hi Keithoz,
What a timely and informative post.
I started to look at Kavango in more detail this weekend, as I have a decent holding in Power metals and had just read an article regarding rem processing plants in the UK. You've provided a comforting comparison ;-)

One more time :-)
Has anyone on here signed up to the discord forum (somebody posted a link to it on here yesterday)?
If so, what do you make of it?

Looks like discord may be the new Telegram, has anyone been on there yet?

tried this discord forum yet?

I only ask because it appears that Japanese big business is ploughing a fortune into superconductor research (barium copper oxide) for fusion reactors.

Is anyone aware if the rare earth Barium Copper Oxide feature on Eurasia's list?

I'm assuming you took the COVID restrictions to an extreme, as I can only assume you also practiced internet separation, if you think "potential dividend news" is the only positive news and update on ops released this year!

Tilly,
It's almost as if they have a vested interest :-)

No,
Because i can read.

Of course I have, I wouldn't say so otherwise. But you're right, I generally don't bother posting on the others as most are slower burners, attracting little attention from the benthic feeders.
I have approx twelve mining holdings, two in oil, and two in finance

Many on here appear to be whining because company progress has not aligned with their own personal timelines and want for a quick profit.
From my own perspective:
Not a single other holding in my portfolio has increased as much in monetary value
Not a single other holding in my portfolio has shown such rapid asset growth
Not a single other holding in my portfolio shows as much potential
Not a single other holding in my portfolio has intimated a divi payout
Not a single other holding in my portfolio has been the focus of such a grand scale of deramping
Not a single other holding in my portfolio has seen so many threads deleted by lse.

Is back with his muck spreading

The great thing is, if LTHs' were having any doubts, this obvious and concerted effort to remove factual information from the board, only bolsters all the great reasons for being in this stock in the first place.
We like the truth, they can't handle the truth, and there's certainly not a few good men amongst them!

It's been nearly two hours since sabu posted any baseless statement designed to spread doubt?

Some Are Born Useless
Wait for the removal :-)

Is my guess until this is removed :-)
https://www.aljazeera.com/program/the-bottom-line/2021/7/8/is-wall-street-rigged-against-the-small-investor

I'm going for 28 minutes, it takes time for the post to be reported, picked up and actioned.
Why are lse backing the institutions? Surely a significant part of their income comes from volume of traffic on the board and the revenue it creates from advertising?

Until this thread is deleted
I've been reliably informed lse have a list of 174 words that we're allowed to post, anything outside the list and you're banned :-)

Agree Dore, but the likes of Tilly and Mac add some balance to a sometimes ultra negative narrative on here. We're all human, and even if we invested with all the amazing potential in mind, we can all be victims of the doubt that the naysayers try to cultivate.
It seems morally wrong that some of these de-rampers can peddle libellous material regarding the bod, whilst the likes of Mac are deleted for posting factual information. Upside down world or what?