Member Info for Lawrence13

So this ****** who is now the governor of the banks off England presided over the FCA and as shown in that Panorama video did sweet FA to save investors from known corrupt selling of ponzi bonds , The are laws in this country but only if you know they are there and have the clout to challenge and use them. That's where we are with POG now. It's blatantly obvious the BoD had no intentions of saving the company as they never once applied for sanction waivers . I've been right about them the last two years

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Bailey_(banker)

Totally agree. Join telegram give us your telegram name and I'll invite on

I think our case is stronger TBH. That was a case of 'buyer beware' ponzi scheme. In our case not only was POG still producing gold it had the POX Hub refractory ore processing plant. So whereas in the Panorama case there was no wealth , it was all fictitious we also have the fact that our own government created our predicament or the conditions that made it a gift to Putin's crowd. It's a sad story though and shows how toothless and pathetic our regulatory bodies are. They hound you with no mercy for penalty Charge Notices than they do with these crooks

Are you on Telegram?

Panorama, the BBC Panorama?

Finders I haven't a clue where to turn. The whole thing makes you feel you've been urinated on and mocked

lewis why are you here , you had no shares, you always defend Opuss and the BoD so what is you purpose, your game?

With me they couldn't even find POG . I have since been told they only deal with stockbroking firms and such enterprises.

This was my first reply, they had no knowledge of who Petroropavlovsk Plc were

Wed, 6 Jul at 12:27
Dear Lawrence Jenkins,

Thank you for contacting the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) via email. Your initial query went to our Complaints team who’ve forwarded it onto the Supervision Hub to respond to you as we're the most appropriate team to do so.

I understand you have concerns about a London Stock Exchange Former FTSE 250 listed company called Petropavlovsk Plc, you've given information about sale of the firm and what you've called a boardroom coup. You've also said the share prices have dropped and that over the last 12 months two auditors have resigned as the firms external auditors, and that this causes you concerns. Thank you for contacting us.

What we do

I appreciate that you've asked if we can investigate, this being the case I thought it would be useful for me to give you an overview of our remit and what we do.

We're responsible for the conduct and supervision of regulated firms such as banks, building societies, insurers, investment firms and those offering consumer credit in the UK. We set the rules and regulations for authorised firms to follow in relation to their regulated activities; however we must remain impartial, this means we can’t investigate consumer’s individual complaints or disputes with an authorised firm, as we do not hold complaint resolution powers.
Petropavlovsk Plc

I've completed a search on our Financial Services Register, this is a public register of the firms authorised by us and warning pages for unauthorised firms. Based on the information you've provided, I've been unable to locate a firm called Petropavlovsk Plc which means they're not authorised by ourselves.

Market Abuse team

As your concerns are linked to the firm and what is happening to the share prices I've forwarded the information on to our Market Abuse team for their review. They do review all emails they receive about suspected market abuse. However, they operate under statutory confidentiality restrictions, and they do not provide feedback or confirm whether they are taking further action.

For more information please see our website page - How to report suspected market abuse as an individual

Legal guidance

As the firm isn't authorised our rules and complaints process will not apply, this being the case you may find seeking legal guidance useful. A good starting point can be Citizens Advice as they can offer free, impartial legal guidance to UK consumers.

Whilst I've been unable to assist you directly I hope the above is of use.

Finally, to help us improve our service, I'm interested in finding out about your experience with the Supervision Hub today. I’ll send you a link to a survey and I'd appreciate it if you could take a few moments to share your feedback with us.

Yours sincerely,

Kim
Supervisor / Supervision Hub
Financial Conduct Authority | www.fca.org.uk
Consumer Helpline: 0800

Why are you chiming in lewis as if Opuss is 'your friend' you know full well Opuss don't give a **** about the pi's. You are so eager for My Hayden to contact your friendly Opuss only to be told his fathers shares are worthless. Do you get a lick out of this

"I have also set up a parliamentary ombudsman enquiry"

How does that work?

Ah yes my MP. Well you probably know she wrote to Liz Truss and I received an answer from the then Minister for North America and Europe James Cleverly, It was ten paragraphs with the first nine about how determined the government sanctions were to protect the rights of Ukrainians. Finally his last paragraph addressed the share holders who have lost everything due to government actions. His reply without a hint of contriteness was You knew the risks investing in russia so tough. Obviously I replied to my MP and him complaining about his ignorance and arrogance and that if the sanctions he crowed about were so good then why was a FSTE 250 British Plc soon to be in the Hands of the Russians and all its PI's slaughtered.
I then recieved in a email contact from the new Minister for europe Graham Stuart again rattling on like Cleverly but this time he said something I felt was very important and that was "the government is looking very thoroughly into unintended consequences of the sanctions.

I replied to that saying yes POG PI's were the unintended consequences of the sanctions that gave POG to Russia on a golden salver. That was sent- I'm still awaiting a response

Well the next big and possibly last date is set for the 15th September onward and that is the challenge against OPUSS and their active attempt to bar share holders from seeing valuation documents and the like. Opuss did send out an update the day before yesterday which the with drew pretty much immediately. Are you on Telegram there's lots of info there . The latest is to contact the FCA again re opuss and their behaviour. It took me several months to get an answer from Opuss as the whethjer either they or the BoD tried to apply for sanction waivers , the answer several day ago , was NO

Now the letters to the judge threshold closed yesterday late afternoon, Lewis & Loon have stopped posting their Russian lies. Who would have thought it.

Lawrence Jenkins, [07/09/2022 14:37]
Any payment to a UK bank for pog is surely sanction breaking and should be seized by the UK authorities and paid to the shareholders. Who gives a **** of ummc and opus get nothing, they at least get the mines and production

Lawrence Jenkins, [07/09/2022 14:38]
I mean of Putin was willing to seize and nationalise why not

At the moment you moronic loon the public are paying for the sanctions, the war and Ukraine difference is POG are paying that as well as their lifes savings. Royal Bank of Scotland, Northern Rock all bailed out for failings that were nothing to do with the government; so now that our losses are directly caused from the government they should be helping us

Crap Ukraine and their leader knew what they were getting their people into, the globalist amongst the western leaders groomed the Ukraine gang who have an openly fascist division. There was no need to directly threaten Russia with missile and rumours say biological factories on their doorstep. And lets face some of the so called Russian atrocities were as fake as hell. So don't give us that moral high ground crap to make you lot at Opuss feel a little bit better for being traitors

41p versus 15p in two years. But please tell me why are you here. You have no shares , you joined in June this years, so why , why waste your life here

ToThe Loon. I think you are an arse licker or getting paid by Russia of Opus (all the same) But now you've started extolling the virtues of KPMG , I now know I'm dead right. KPMG's audit on POG proved nothing , it was a mud throwing exercise by the crook installed BoD in 2020. But surely KPMG are impeccable ? Yeah right
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-11/kpmg-sued-in-dubai-for-600-million-over-alleged-sloppy-auditing#:~:text=KPMG%20LLP%20was%20sued%20for%20at%20least%20%24600,sloppy%20auditing%20made%20against%20the%20Big%20Four%20firm.

Yes eventually I got a response via my mp from James Cleverly, 10 paragraphs 9 of which were praising the wonderful government sanctions which essentially have given pog to the Russians and the last paragraphing saying anyone who has invested in Russia new the risks so essentially tough. Arrogant **** comes to mind.
However I can guarantee that not one cabinet minister has suffered due to sanctions