Hambro's Letter to the FT25 Jun 2018 12:36
PH wades in post Friday's pod cast from a letter to the Times
Peter Hambro has criticised the performance of Petropavlovsk’s recently appointed chief executive ahead of this week’s annual general meeting, where shareholders will vote on a motion seeking to oust the board.
Mr Hambro, co-founder of the Russian-based gold company, said it was “shameful that chief executive Roman Deniskin” was not prepared admit during a call with investors on Friday that a project to construct a new processing plan was “badly behind schedule”.
“In reply to questions from me and other participants, the recently appointed chief executive failed to say whether or not the commissioning, particularly of the flotation part of the Pressure Oxidation project, was sufficiently advanced to provide meaningful gold production in 2018,” Mr Hambro said in a letter sent to the Financial Times. “His reply was that it ‘would produce ounces’, but failed to say how many. When pressed, by me he refused to quantify but added that they would be ‘uneconomic’ ounces”.
CABS and Slevin, two offshore trusts that control 9.1 per cent of Petropavlovsk, are seeking to oust the company’s board and bring back its former chief executive Pavel Maslovskiy, who founded the London-listed miner with MR Hambro in 1994. They have the support of Kazakh tycoon Kenes Rakishev, who owns 22 per cent of the company.
CABS and Slevin also invited Mr Hambro to return as a director but due to “personal commitments” he has only agreed to provide external support to the board.
Mr Hambro continued: “If Petropavlovsk’s own concentration plant is not capable of producing sufficient gold concentrate for the plant to process, of course it is ‘good’, as I clearly said, that Petropavlovsk should find a supply from third party. However it is shameful that the CEO dissemble and is not prepared to admit publicly that the project under his management is, as we know from the managers and Union, badly behind schedule.”
“Treating third-part concentrate would strengthen cash flow, which the CEO seems to confuse with strengthening the Balance sheet. Only a sale, or some partial disposal, would achieve that end and contemplation of a disposal is something that he continues to deny.”