RE: Desired objectives?1 Jul 2021 18:06
Mitch984, isn't that just semantics though?
The real issue is that -at least- a couple of billion USD is needed to move this forward. Part of it is directly needed by ZIOP, but there is significant infrastructure needed as a precondition to Zanaga being viable; SEZ backers, SEZ expropriation $$$, new Port constructed and financial/operational backers, Rail modernisation, or slurry pipeline, power, etc etc
And right now, there is NO one ready to sink BN's of USD into the hands of Nguesso&Co. Sure they talk about PPP and shared risk and all that, but unfortunately their credibility is sub zero.
I guess that what I'm trying to say is that there is not ONE party stalling, but rather; not ONE party left in the market willing to play Russian roulette with a few billion USD.
The only party I can imagine playing this game eventually, is President XI, and you can be sure that if he takes the reins/risk of dancing with Nguesso&Co its not going to be to pay minority shareholders of some AIM outfit sitting behind Glencore, but rather China to take the lion's share of all Iron in RoC. We're too insignificant to register in the big picture, and Glencore is unlikely to fight tooth and nail for anything related to a landlocked greenfield project beyond extracting marketing rights or debt repayment for their Oil business. None of the above will benefit AIM punters even remotely.
Same as Sooty I've reduced my holding reluctantly and painfully to low six figure holding from seven a year ago. This has always been a binary bet, and might still come good, but after almost 8 years of waiting I've had enough and left just enough in to keep an eye on it, but no longer putting my hopes for a 10X payout.
GL, Kongo.