Member Info for KNIGELK

I suspect the guy had too much of the old sauce last night... The truth is that every share provokes debate - for buying and for selling/avoiding. No thread s/b 100% positive or negative ... people looking in need to see both view points before deciding whether to buy. I agree with him that some posters have agendas and want to damage certain companies (ie "trolls") but at the same time some posters try to pump share prices and make wild predictions to promote more buying - surely both are as bad as one another? Anyway I am going to spend some time reading back though the accounts/results to give my updated balanced view of the situation - the share deserved a long overdue re-rate - it was under valued. The debate going forward are a) how likely is a disposal/corporate action and b) what would be a fair share price if this happens... gl

I am not here to make money for others.. I am here to discuss the merits or otherwise of investing in the shares I post on! I don't care what other people do... I Just give my opinion... 100% positive/ramp posts - mean you want others to buy/usually so you can sell at a higher level 100% negative/troll posts - mean you want others to sell/usually because you want in at a lower level or are shorting However the third type of poster - is a shareholder/monitor of an investment - were they see both bull/bear sides of the share - to help in deciding whether to buy more/hold/or reduce... I try to see both sides.. ok? My beef - today - has been the number of 100% ramps - that's all.. (and the fact you brought up my investment history suggests you have a grudge or long term history on LSE)

Admin - deal with this poster and his claims 1) he was not a member when I traded HHR (unless under another name) 2) How does he claim to know me? 3) How can a mere private investor who acquire shares in one company be a scammer and somehow cause the share price to rise? pmsl.... (the share price rose because the company recovered and had a balance sheet restructuring) 4) His claims cross a line - so who is scammer here? Who is causing the share price to rise? Answer - no one. Just like 99.9% of shares - the 0.1% get targeted by the boiler room mob and suck some in...

This is a discussion thread RAMPER ProfW... it's not about followers ... not about who believes who... at the moment more people are willing to buy the share than sell it .. I actually say HOLD it .. I would not sell more yet because of the low free float and attention this thread is getting... Just as others are aware that a) they should have a target to sell/reduce .. and b) it's high risk... no news or another no reason RNS and back down to 2p... may happen.. LSE active traders know of countless episodes of shares moving up on a spike and then going back down Just as quick.. FITB probably being the most infamous example - were I did very well but kept reinvesting on the way down.. So lets see what happens here!!!!! BTW posts do not move share prices.. I have no more power to effect the share price than any other poster here .. of course on a spike and multiple posters posting high share price predictions .. some may buy .. without even research (!) to make an quick buck! What moves a share price over the longer term are RNSs... the ball is in the company's court. Good night!

31 posts now... stoop to my level? You made the slur saying I am a troll Just because I cannot see 20-50p here .. I said 10p may be possible simply due to low free float and demand from the s/t traders.. I have posted on 10 shares this month.. seven I hold .. three I either held or may invest in. Only once in a blue moon do I post on a share I have no intention of trading.. I am well known on LSE over the 6-7 years as a member.. usually post balanced arguments.. rarely ramp.. try not to deramp.. I only got mad because a few were coming out with mindless targets (149p ffs) with no explanation of valuation. Sorry but I doubt you will be able to rise to my level..

Admin - take note. ProfW claims he can get his post repeated by a dozen posters.. OK - how can this happen. One of two ways 1) he is part of a "team" promoting certain shares - you see the same posters on certain spikes or 2) he has multiple accounts. BTW I do not currently hold 100 shares - I said over the years I have traded 100 different shares. Currently hold between 5-10 shares as I like to spread risk and am getting quite a bit in cash as a market correction will happen probably sooner rather than later. LSE - too many posts on other posters .. not enough on the merits of the companies .. and after a 500% rise here .. it will be interesting to see what happens next. BTW RNSs do not come very often here so news may be a while - and "interest" usually moves elsewhere to the next favour of the month within 2-3 weeks. Posters leave .. do not say when they sell .. only when they buy..

You have made Just 30 posts - so you have no idea of my trading or posting history - ok? When I moved my final salary CETV into a SIPP back in 2011 I have over £500k to invest. Since I was a little over 40 I decide to be an active trader investing in small cap/AIM shares - over 5-6 years I have been invested OR TRADED around 100 shares. My best investment was HHR going from 1p to 17p while my worse was Yell.. Now lets get things clear to you - the newbie - I support my investments - I rarely troll - (so were you get this daft idea that I troll on spikes is beyond me) - but I detest rampers with share price targets WHEN THEY DO NOT GIVE A REASON FOR THE VALUATION. CSF Group has been dormant for a LONG time - I held £300 now valued at £1500 - so as a shareholder I want this to do well - but I also do not want people buying without research and getting caught on a spike - especially when the company themselves have said they know of no reason for the rise. Lets see how things develop here - but Mr 30 posts - you have been reported for your slur. I am not a troll - never have been - never will be - I simply do not like bs..

Too true - held well over 100 shares over the years - most small cap/AIM .. including this share. However I know a p&d attack when I see one... Yes the share price was undervalued and a re-rating is welcomed. However I repeat the parties have had well over a year to make a low ball offer here .. .perhaps they are now kicking themselves? So part of the company may be disposed of - good. No cert it will be at a substantial premium... Personally I do see upside .. maybe up to 10p .. but 50p? That's a pump.. sorry..

Look there was a RNS .. and it provided interest.. and due to the lack of shares in issue (just 24%) any volume causes a spike. However lets not pretend that 95% of the posters here were even aware or interested in CSFG until last Friday .. that they were not here saying this share was worth 10p, 49p, 50p or even 149p!. The share was stuck for month after month under 1p .. look back.. why was that? Now it's possible a subsidiary may be sold.. it's possible the company has been grossly undervalued.. but the company stated there is NO reason for the share price rise. Why would there be a takeover? They have had months to make an offer! Probably 2-3p would have been accepted! So if anything the major shareholders will either be considering selling out at the new higher price or quickly making a sensible offer a little higher than current price. If the share price is really worth 49p .. then it should have been closer to 49p .. not 1p as ditto the last year!!! DYOR

Why buy after a 400% rise? Whatever the news is suppose to be .. Its factored in

Following the Company's shareholders rejecting the Board's proposal to cancel trading of the Company's shares on AIM last year, the Board has been considering a number of options for the Group. These include the possible disposal of one of the Company's operating subsidiaries and the Group is currently in discussions with interested parties, although the Group has not reached any definitive offer or agreement with respect to any potential disposal and there can be no certainty that any discussions will lead to a transaction, or the terms on which any transaction might be agreed, or its timing. Amongst other things, any potential disposal will need to be undertaken in accordance with the AIM Rules for Companies and other applicable regulations. * So no current plans for delisting as rejected at the last AGM * It's not a takeover - it may be parties interested in ONE part of the company - as per the RNS!

Well you will do well to make 10p tomorrow .. being Saturday... Be nice to see some details behind the very rampy (imo) share price predictions...

Great points .. although it could be argued that the share price had all this factored in and perhaps was a little under-valued at 1p.. Also another risk to consider is that the company may use the higher share price to issue shares (seen it happen so many times)... still the right disposal may result in further upside but still a higher risk share that currently is best for s/t trading

I usually avoid the twitter accounts because they obviously are holders (of any share) and want to project the best case ... and how often do they get it right (re charts)? Of course the share price may continue to increase BUT we will need further news to continue interest/volume .. and that's not a cert. Anyway.. been a fun few days and nice to see interest here (again)

I guess we can all name a number of companies with far higher share prices from years ago (maybe before share consolidations or placings)... to be fair .. I don't mind posters giving out share price targets .. if sensible.. if backed up with facts... just saying "10p coming according to the charts" or "20p soon!" is a simple ramp. Been around long enough to know... However lets look at the facts 1) the share price - until last week - has been dormant for months (but you are right - has been far higher .. I remember 20p from 3-4 years ago).. 2) there is decent net cash equal to market value (but falling) c) there are net liabilities on the balance sheet 4) the share price rise seems due to a POSSIBLE disposal as nothing else has apparently changed. So the question is .. is this a p&d (no) or a re-rating (yes) and how much can the disposal rise? Personally I think 6-8p is fair value - but what do I know? GLA

To be fair - not sure why Sally Gunnell needs to be tweeted .. she has literally nothing to do with the mess the company is in.. she only came onto the scene recently and I doubt she is making management decisions. She is probably wishing she never ever got involved here in the first place (especially if given shares as part of her package).. so lets leave her out of this...

Which charts are showing a 10p target please? (will be very interested since the year high has been 5.25p)

I felt it has been undervalued for a long time - still hard to say what's a fair share price.. still a risk of a second speeding ticket... still worth being careful and having a sensible exit price... we both know that these type of shares can go down as quick as they can go up... so personally sold some.. gl

I have to laugh .. as a holder of a very tiny number.. this thread has been dormant for ages .. until suddenly late last week! They may sell part of the business (great) but doesn't mean the share price should have risen so much after months of flat lining..

I doubt we will have to wait much longer... the truth is that the company has very little cash left.. it is either going to find an alternative method of funding (equity stake/loan) or it will be going bust/administration - I guess within 1-3 weeks... sadly not long now .. either way