Member Info for KingofClangers

Leno. What ulterior motives could anyone who is negative on this share possibly now have? Anyone who shorted it will be well out of here by now probably with pockets full of cash, especially if they did it from 40p down. In fact are there any shorts open on it at present?

The only other thing could be a lower entry point, but if anyone was seriously thinking about buying surely there's not much lower of an entry point and if one occurs, you'd seriously have to question why the share is at that level and if it is at all investible.

I think the negheads are pretty much a combination of disgruntled holders, like myself; and those who haven't forgotten the incessant ramping which went on here and want to have a go at the culprits.

Surely we need a countdown?

@ Mjd2000 😂

Also Emperor Palpatine would have a fit about that definition of 'fully operational'...

Am I the only one not getting excited about footage of a crane moving one shovel full of muck? 🙄

I'll only be satisfied when we get a table cloth update 🙂.

Even as a peed off holder of this share I find Toffers unrelenting posts pretty tiresome, however setting up a brand-new account to deliver the type of insult you know will get the thread removed is pretty pathetic. Can't you just choose not to read Toffers ramblings or filter them if they're getting you to the point that you'd wish death on someone?

Kammy,

Unoriginal as ever I see. I'll reiterate, I hold shares here so I would be very happy a sale and money in my pocket. The higher price the better. However, I'm also a realist and not going to pretend to be happy about the current situation, why would I be?

For balance, I will say I was pleasantly surprised by the AGM which is helping me keep a slither of faith.

Leno,

I wasn't seeking any truth. I thought it was a reasonable question to ask someone who has gone to the trouble of announcing on a share message board that they are forwarding what they consider to be potential evidence of libel to a company. I just wondered what you'd think if, after going to all that effort, the BOD didn't act upon it?

Leno. If the screenshots aren't acted upon and no libel cases happen, what conclusions should be drawn from that?

Del. Take no notice of them. You ask valid questions and as most genuine, sound of mind holders do; you want to know what the heck is going on with your investment (money).

Trowtech. 'Whether he admits it or knows it'.. Have a word with yourself. Hopefully this was tongue in cheek, although I doubt it.

Thoughtcrimes all round.

OKFN. What's the missing bit? Nothing is coming up so far. 👍

Great point OSF. The last unequivocal RNS about the war said the company remains unaffected. Or did we have to read between the lines and see the hidden messages to know it probably is?

Ragsrob. Surely it would be able to wipe its nose with that wonderful working mine it's got and doing what normal businesses would and selling stuff?

IKN. I'm not denying responsibility for my own actions. I'm saying I held based on RNSs from the company (some like to refer to them as FACTS) but now, in my view, as they appear to have been utter shat, I'll be using my vote to show my disappointment.

IKN. Yes I do, hell no doubt have had a hand in the rather dubious RNSs. So yep, I'd like to see him gone.

Iknownuffin (true). Profits for anyone who traded it right. I bought hoping for a sale and held on the back of RNSs which implied that it was not far off. Buyer, due diligence etc.

IKN. Also surely if he can take credit for a 1p to 42p rise then the reverse works with 42p to 2.5p? 🤷

Yeah.. He's helped maintain a steadily rising SP with real value behind it. What do we own again? 🤔

Oct 2002