Member Info for keeptofacts

btw, how was JP when he called you just after 12 ;)
actually, I don't know it was JP, might have been Brian

happy to give anyone the benefit of the doubt.
one question, why did you post on the 1st that you might wait until sub 7p in January (or similar) when all the public information stated the deal would be signed by year end?

that long term holder and supporter Crudehope hasn't posted at all on the day when the news lands?

i believe he gave a talk at the Gherkin, anyone get his real name?

on the 1st, right after he met the BOD
Jez, my final top-up hasn't yet happened because I just haven't been bothered to transfer the funds. In my mind, there is still plenty of time to make that decision & ample opportunity for the sp to drop to a more accommodating price...say nearer to 7p or below. I will probably wait until December or even January as that could be the nadir of the share price prior to FID...but knowing our track record on timelines that might well be premature...it's always anyones guess when trying to time a trade!

if it transpires he has sold a single share between then and this morning, he's in deep ****, as are the bod, lawyer or not.

finally someone with some common sense!

I'm interested to know which of these is correct
1: you are stupid enough to believe what you wrote
2: you think we are stupid enough to believe it

which is it?

who will make a (small) profit out of this.
today we will see people's true colours, suspect it won't be pretty

that is one of the most disgusting posts I've ever seen.
truly vile.
some people call the Samaritans when they are literally about to kill themselves.
no one should ever liken share trading with that.
pathetic individual, hope you're proud of yourself.

agreed.
and the funny thing is that when we sell, those of us who actually own shares will take our profit and move on, but the bitter and twisted will probably still be posting their bile.

reply to me (and others) from sound was the end of year expected completion was for a signed deal or rns saying plan B.
so, yes, if a vote is needed we would need to be told more than 3 weeks before year end.

so clearly any suggestion that JP is spinning this out for his salary is patently rediculous.

there are many people on here who need help!
being positive and posting is rational.
being permanently negative and posting is not.
the rational thing to do in that case is sell (if you hold) and move on with your life, such that it is.

you do make me laugh, almost as much as you did when you posted as neptunes.

are you REALLY that stupid?
Mahatma / shaungreen (whover that may actually be) complained that the bod were meeting a PI.
presumably they had the lawyer present to remove the possibility of people later claiming inside information was passed.
pretty straightforward ar$e covering.

the only odd thing was a couple of subsequent posts from crude where he deffinitely tried to give the impression of a delay, for whatever neffarious reason known only to him.
when I pointed this out the immediate response brought to mind the phrase 'me thinks you do protest too much'

all very amusing.

only 39 business days left this year.
we'll get some news pretty soon, one way or the other.

actually, it does look to me rather like crude is attempting to trade this by hinting that he knows there will be a delay.
if that's the case it's a disgusting thing to do.
IF we end up getting a delay rns very serious questions will need to be asked.
I must admit this stance does surprise me.

do you not think someone spending many millions on Tendrara including TE5. might like to know how much revenue TE5 will provide before confirming an offer?
now there is a mou the buyer can work oyut how much cash floiw TE5 will generate whilst they continue exploration in the wider area.
The mou provides one aspect of certainty for a prospective buyer.

I didn't say you lost it all here, did I?
but you are a bitter little man for some reason?
hope that's clear enough for you to understand.

btw. it's pretty obvious that there are only two ways mahatma / shaun could have know the lawyer was going to be present.
1: he is connected to sound (rather unlikely I would say)
2: he is the idiot who complained to sound about them meeting crude and hence was told the lawyer would be there.

says it all really.

do you and lostallhismoney not understand what 'tongue in cheek' and :) means?

mahatma is shaungreen re born but sadly unchanged.