Member Info for keeptofacts

the moron will dominate this thread for weeks now.
I was told by GM years ago that stach was a retired GP with a big opinion of his medical knowledge.
of course GM couldn't organise a p!ss up in a brewery but no reason to believe he lied about this guy.

good god, the miserable old ex gp guy is still hanging around!
hasn't had a good thing to say about val in a decade or more!

but as far as I can see, these are excellent first results.
they can do an awful lot in terms of tweaking dossage and patient characteristics.
I believe the results we have put this in the potentialy rather valuable catagory, not to mention pretty good news for patients.

methinks you protest too much :)

btw. it's a fun exercise running 'new poster's' posts through text compoarison apps against posters who are no longer with us.
amazing where the similarities show up :)
have a lovely day/

interesting, someone who has been a member of lse since 16th November is trying to throw doubt on news this year and using Capital letters to do so.
I wonder why?

what are you on about?
they are reported as buys and the volume added to the buy column boith times.
however, they are almost certainly a rollover with a small spread to pay the costs.

traders are on a thread. you start seeing posters add 'lol' to the end of their posts.
ask yourself, have you ever heard anyone except a teenager use 'lol'?

come from who can't string together a sentence of English?

the broker note is irrelevant, as is your opinion.
the results will move this in the right way.

why are you wasting your time posting here? no one is interested.

this WILL rise rapidly soon, BUT mms do NOT accumulate stock.
they make their money on the spread not by speculating on share price changes.

it's marked as a sell because the price had moved by the time it was reporte an hour late. the bid/offer moved up immediately after it's trade time

I very much doubt 'anto' has any chums. :)

I did find it odd that they didn't have that comment as a banner on the site for everyone to see.
taking a pro active decision to close chat to relieve pressure whilst fixing a problem is a hell of a lot better than letting people think the site is just ****e and crashing all the time.

I e-mailed yesterday to ask what was going on with this site and received the following e-mail.

The high volume of market data we're seeing and being sent is causing problems elsewhere on the website. Share Chat being turned off is to minimise the on-site issues for members and to keep live data running so people can still trade. The fix we're looking to implement is close to being finished, to prevent the website from having issues when we see a large increase in trade data. We can only give our apologies and say we're doing everything we can as quickly as we can to get it fully resolved.

I'd tend to believe suzy over the previous Muppets.
can't be ar$ed checking but I'd bet the rns announcing 101 patents coinsided with fund raises!

I suspect you got 'got well and truly stuffed' because you aren't bright enough to know the difference between of and off

Nothing else to say other than be careful of who you listen to. (not too :) )

not at all.
if the spread is 20/25 (say) and you see a load of trades at 22.2 they will be reported as sells, but if you also see some trades at 20 also reported as sells you can obviously deduce that the 22.2 sells are in fact buys.
ignore the colours, look at the prices.

you do understand that a sell or buy is simply defined on these systems depending on which side of the mid price it is?

there is no way to accurately define buys/sells if the mms are selling below mid price.

I sincerely hope not, that would be inside information and a criminal act.

wtf are you on about? 7p?