Member Info for keeptofacts

on the cusp of something big here, finally.

agreed, not greed (too much of that seen on this bb before)

greed re drilling.
re chad, I think it's as simple as he/she trawling the boards looking for any mention of dilution and then hoping on board to try to generate a drop.

either you're thick as **** or you think we are, which is it?

when people start shouting 'snouuts in the trough' etc.
these guys are running a multi million pound company, doing something the previous numpties failed to do. They are creating a company that should make investors decent money, yet people think they should do it for nothing. Yet the same people think they deserve to be made rich sitting on the coat tails of the bod! If you think they should do it for less why don't you start a company and do exactly that? The bod's pay is modest and long term incentives standard in the industry.

a pause in the sp rise and up poips a filtered poster.
the great thing is as sound continue to deliver the frequency of her posts will drop.
unfortunately she will still be posting that there is no value here when the sp is 10, 20, 30p ........

I have a different approach, I simply buy the dips, but don't sell.
With my luck I'd be out on the day news hits. I might miss on selling the spikes, but happy enough to keep increasing my holding at below the spikes.

I was sort of expecting a bit of trader profit taking this morning, but no, it's still looking strong.
those big buys late yesterday are also interesting.
Has sound finally turned a corner? I think so.

yes, 50p would be great, but I'm pretty happy with high 2s at the moment, I've virtually doubled my more recent top ups.

I DO however find it interesting that after a very long silence trellis 'virtually' pops up just as the rise gets going to gently nudge the focus back to the past!

coincidence? I guess it could be ...

I didn't say I wasn't interested did I?
I did say it will take YEARS to even get to court.
A prosecution will probably only lead to a fine and being bared from being a director, neither will hurt the suspects.
AND it's a distraction from the more important business of sound making me money!

I certainly do not support JP et al. (and I do suspect a fraud was commited) however, the police can not acknowledge a fraud was commited, only the court can do that.
if this does eventually come to court it will take a VERY long time and I very much doubt any shareholder who has lost money will ever see any returned.
I did make exactly this point to trellis when he was posting as himself on here (as opposed to someone else). One has to wonder wht trellis deleted all his posts on here.
ANYWAY - this is all completely irrelevant to recovery and imminent prosperity of sound that seems to be underway.

genuinely curious, why does it matter if a small time private investor approves of the ceo or not?

will be used to, not will be sued to :)

I don't think the tax issue is a significant problem or blocker, either for a buyout, partner or sound alone.
the big boys will be sued to navigating such things and a word in the right ear in Morocco would run along the lines of 'you want this gas out of the ground, we can do that but we want this tax issue to go away ...' it will be about the Moroccan tax officials not losing face, hence the time it's taking to be officially put to bed.

bigb, I'm as positive as everyone else, but you're posts are driftig into pure ramping.
maybe dial it back a bit? we all know free web based price services are delayed and pre market meaningless.

it gets better and better :)

Oh good grief, has that nutter ps spent all day yesterday trying to find a negative in the annual report?
I really can't be bothered reading her gibberish, what is it 'repeat ad nauseum that phase 1 has no value' or the old favourite aimed at scaring new investors, highlighting the usual 'going concern statement'? if the latter, keep in mind that is a standard statement on virtually every listed company's accounts aimed purely at safeguarding the auditors who sign off the accounts. if you are unlucky enough to still have a mortgage paid from monthly salary, your personal annual statement (should you produce one) would need a similar statement to allow an auditor to sign off as you might lose your job and not be able to meet liabilities!
it's another lovely day on Sound's journey to success.

and immediately back up, brutal! :)

find it's legs ...