Member Info for keeptofacts

I think you'll find I called no one anything. I asked 'are you a moron?' the question could be answered yes or no.
you on the other hand did directly insult me, not that it matters a jot.
I also included an explanation as to why the pre market price shown here was of no value. hence I may well have educated the poster (and others) not to read anything into pre market prices.

are you a moron?
the price shown here is 15 minutes delayed and pre market open is showingt he price before most mms are showing a price.
could be 95% up or down and still be meaningless.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-61723252

background to increasing demand, nothing new, but interesting

so what?
what has it got to do with sound NOW.
if you're so jealous why don't you go and get a couple of non exec director roles? there are loads advertised on LinkedIn

sadly not for this top up

thanks to those who panicked.

that's complete giberish.
you do know thst the BOD have spent their own money buying shares in this fundraise?

seems my smiley face has been converted to ?? by this site. no humour allowed?

I knew it, a pig flew by the window earlier ??

I actually think things will start moving pretty quickly now.
The Anoual drill has to be this year. There was no hint of ‘it might not happen’ from anyone
during the Q&A. I would expect partner news soon followed pretty quickly by drill plans.

Think you'll find the same people moaning about the fund raise are the same people who blame others for losing money they couldn't afford during the previous debacle. They really shouldn’t be allowed to invest in exploration companies. Or indeed probably anything more risky than premium bonds.
A company not earning revenue needs to raise money to get to the point it is earning revenue. It’s as simple as that.
Sound have a clear pathway to significant revenue (phase 1 and phase 2) AND have the potential to increase this dramatically through exploration in the near term. Anoual will be drilled this year. Would I prefer they didn’t fund raise? Yes, but it’s the reality and I think it’s worth it or I would sell.

it's around 22:23 minutes in

Sarah D replied to me that John said 'shareholders' fwiw I can't hear that the word seems too short, but I'll take her answer at face value.
pimp - you were listening to the wrong bit. I wasn't talking about the down hole gauge, but the discussion around negotiation for the three well package.

as I said, I couldn't quite make it out on the recording.
I did think it was shell, if not it deffinitely ends in ell, agshell? what ever that might be. I have mailed Sarah Dees for confirmation.

yes 22:23
just listened again and can't quite make it out.
when I listened live I heard shell, certainnly he says 'wouldn't be appropriate or in ??ells interest ..
.

sorry, I wasn't sure and I'm not going to post what I thought I heard as it would certainly be seen as ramping.
I think we will find out soon enough as to get Anoual drilled this year they need to get things moving.
we'll hear who the partner is soon enough. Suffice it to say John mentioned majors AND super majors

soundas - I posted this during the Q&A

Phase 1 23m/year revenue
phase 2 100m/ year revenue
leading to 70m /year free cash flow to sound!
what's the market cap?

interestingly I may not be able to confirm what I thought I heard when john was talking about Anoual drilling.
He said they were talking to a partner and it wouldn't be in our interest or ????s interest to give a running commentary.

I thought the ???? were a name and hoped to check when the recording was available, but apparently it may not get published for some reason.
Of course I may have misheard which is why I’m not posting what I thought I heard.

Phase 1 23m/year revenue
phase 2 100m/ year revenue
leading to 70m /year free cash flow to sound!

what's the market cap?

did I hear something interesting when john was talking about Anoual drilling. He said they were talking to a partner and it wouldn't be in our interest or ????s interest to give a running commentary.
to avoid accusation of ramping I know what I think I heard where the ???? are, did anyone else?

no

agreed, there is always risk. If there wasn't you wouldn't get multi baggers.

I see Sound as being in the right sector at the right stage of development and at the right time to potentially give very significant upside.