Member Info for katstrangler

Whaaaat? so Treger mentions many times Tyseley and Maginito and the IPO and Separation of Assets but when i said same on Friday, go ridiculed?

some folk here really don't like noobs making a contribution to the discussion, eh! The 'i've never heard Treger mention Mkango' line sounds a bit... ermm... ooooh... and, as for the clown icons... well!

Explicitly said that they didn't rns applying for MICA in September 2025 so will likely do the same here... but they might. alternately, i said look for buys to see if anyone in the know buys in as it could be connected to the realignment of the company, as shown by the friday find by Llyd.

you need to get off your grievance that some critics of the company have called it right on a share that you've staked a lot on... doesn't matter that you witter on about a freeride or whatever justification you have for having held and watched the price fall, substantially.

but if you want to try and make my posts since Friday afternoon (remember, 'you have 2mins to buy into the news'?) then have at it!

i'm always very comfortable with my posts... might get things wrong occasionally but i'm honest enough to admit them... and i don't go on childish insults (massive's the exception as he's a child in an investor's body) with anyone having a different opinion.

go on, knock yourslef out... but i'll be watching the sp tomorrow morning... just in case. then fully expect massiveloser to say i haven't a stake...

funny ol' game, eh!

(incidentally, be interested in Lloyd's take on the Friday night deadline talk, as he's the only one folk feel is untouched by bias...)

Why?

because GST sp is in the toilet... because there hasn't been any good news for months, beyond a face-saving, last minute buy for Finferro, which only gives them 6months breathing space before things gets awkward again but, mainly, because the sp is in the toilet and folk are looking for anything positive from the company. plus, if their housekeeping really IS forSandbox then it might imply they're doing the same for ICA.

Semnet is just about getting back their own cash, now... the IPO valuation was based on nothing much and is ridiculous andMetapay is another thing that is waiting for someone else to make the decisions... but at least Lloyd's Friday night discovery is aligned with sunday night too!

hilarious that the time i throw some optimism into the pot is the time folk start trolling their own share!

the things people will do just to scratch their personal grievance itch! 🤣

if the price looks like it's rising i might dabble but... considering the markets will probably take a dip on Trump's verbal bllx, probably be better shares to look out for...

either way, gla. even the trolls v2.0.

I literally posted that link AND the stablecoin sprint links y'day... but maybe they only count when someone else posts it!

there's a chance they WON'T post it... they didn't, to my recollection, post an rns when they applied for MICA... the logic seems to be if you don't post something like that that 'might' be price sensitive then you also don't have to post a rejection as they' cancel' each other out. if you don't pump the price you don't have to trash the price either. i take that with a pinch of salt but...

the point when they 'WOULD have to announce it is when fca publish the name... but as that'll presumably, take a couple of weeks to assess...

so, your only clues are: is there any notable buying? was there any actions taken by the company before the deadline? they wouldn't even have to anser you if you asked Tim the question... he'd just say 'wait for an rns'... the reason i said keep an eye on it this week.

and, if there's any other rns released see it as a bonus...

(but good to know my posts are more valuable than the rubbish personal insult posts.)

... so now it's cracks in the pavement! 🤣

And, again, another poster who says nothing about the company or the discussion points but has a hack at the poster.

so far, the only 'added information' we've had is 'money doesn't buy class' and now 'empty vessels'.

i think that speaks to the quality of the additional postings here!

Am amazed the sp slipped after that, ESPECIALLY after it was followed by the Cirtec stereax shipments.

while i'm confident that there'll be a nice buzz from the half year results and the investormeet regarding stereax but it's the results of the testing of the 10Ah batteries that move the sp, if better than positive. the fact they've already created the pilot production facility and then will, presumably tweak the 50Ah betteries for shipping is the gateway to trials in actual Tier1 vehicles.

they raised in May (?) 2025 at 33p and the sp is barely above that now.

not sure about prices over the next couple of weeks except for being higher. not sure if it'll hold into the public release of reaction to 10Ah batts but, if it does what Purdey has already said, i have an optimistic 60p target. again, don't know if the sp will hold but pretty confident that the support will be better than today's 38.5.

v e r y exciting week to come.

gla.

Billy, you say things like 'you know'... you 'know' why Tan became CEO in November and 'you know' why he's now moved. and all i'm saying is it's very co-incidental that the Sandbox deadline is tonight... and that it might well be co[incidental or it could be that hen FCA look at the application over the next couple of weeks, the separation of front and back end and is a requirement for Sandbox (and probably helps with MICA reapplication, too).

i 'don't know', i don't pretend to... but it's there to draw conclusions on.

Billy, you're arguing the toss over a £300k sum when the company has lost, what, £50million mcap in a year?

meanwhile, the rest of the deeply-in-red holders 'contribute' to the bb with 'researh like 'money doesn't buy class'!.

not sure what that says about losing money... but i guess that 'adds class' to all the investors!

like i said before, just look at what's happening tonight and judge whether Lloyd's discovery of the linkedin post about Tan is ! + ! equally 5 or zero.

but, chhrist, Billy, you''re attempts at being 'clever' are for the birds!

'expected'... just like Bake had no plans for MICA failing...

expectation isn' a fact until it's happened. 'late december' has gone and we passed early Jan last week.

you think it's 'trolling' to point out the weaknesses of the company. so all of last year would have been 'trolling'? Was it 'trolling' to say the whole of the IPO nonsense, too? Was it nonsense to say that Ypsilon don't register on any kind of cmpany details as having any revenue? Was it 'trolling' to say there's been no proof of purchase or delivery of the Nvidia servers? Is it 'trolling' to say the multiyear component of the $36million isn't mentioned in the arbitration?

the ONLY actual demonstrable facts atm are that Bake moved their clients to Poland (which they trumpeted as a positive BEFORE telling you, me and the investors that MICA had failed) and that Tan has separated his duties with GF Fintech to clean up the company layout. the only real reason for that is for either MICA and Sandbox and, as the deadline for Sandbox is tonight... now, whether GST rns that tomorrow is another matter so the silence will create its own ramps or deramps. But as Lloyd bought it to everyone's attention, i'll leave it to him to decide if it did or didn't happen. all i'd say is it'll take a bit of time for it to be acknowledged by FCA (but i reposted the site for folk to bookmark).

personally, i don't like BoD's reluctance to say... anything except the weakest linkedin one-liners without any explanations. i wouldn't mind if it's the case that they'd prefer to post in their mother tongue instead of english, for clarity but, as they do neither... but it doesn't stop me from recognising the potential of specific news to potentially push the sp higher in the hsort term so i'll be looking at it from 0800. tomorrow for a few days...

but you have to decide for yourself if something's happening or not and take your position on it

For everyone else reading this bb, just focus on the current facts and opinions about the current actual happenings and not empty ramps and discussions about the history of posters or whether or not they are 'friends of the share!

look at what happened on friday and, possibly, this this week or month. not what you'd like to have happen but what you know has definitely happened and what might.

as far as i'm concerned, they might get £1.2million back from arbitration and whatever the value of the treasury shares are at current price, for use in the future. might (but been saying that for a while now) get Metapay news and might see rns about applying for Sandbox (though they never rns'd applying for MICA, just result at the last moment!). beyond that i epxect them to remain tight lipped so sp will move of optimism or pessimism (usually does better in the quiet times where ramps can pull folk in!)

so make your choice and decide if 0.65 is a great price or the best it'll get for a while.

if you're already in then doesn't matter... but if noone's buying then noone believes the good news is coming!!

happy sunday!

///and here's the backup if they didn't apply by close tomorrow (but like i said, they don't have to announce it... if the don't announce it then they don't have to announce a rejection... at least until they've fixed an alternative (ike the MICA ballsup):

https://events.fcainnovation.co.uk/stablecoin_sprint

have fun!

Here's an interesting point... GST are under no obligation to inform the markets that they have applied for Sandbox...and might only do so after they've been added to FCA list: https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/innovation/regulatory-sandbox/accepted-firms

but by then the rise might have already kicked off!

makes for a fun monday!

gla.

To me, it's possible that there'll be an rns monday or tuesday... with a bit of luck it'll be to say they've submitted their application to Sandbox... 'course, it could also be something else... or there could just be the usual silence but those two don't move themselves around the assets for laughs... i suspect it's a regulatory clean up separating Tan from Coalculus and Fintech from Angr and GSMoney.

i'm guessing the same would apply for

Massive, what kind of investor are you when you can't post anything about the workings of the company, just comments about the posters?

you understnad nothing about what's going on and the limit of your investment knowledg eis hiding behind other or just pumping out trash 'we should see blue today'.

you are a terrible, terrible, terrible poster that just takes up pixels to satisfy your vexed admission that you've puntedd way too much money based on the ramps of others. you're finally realising just how little you understand about this company. i find that funny!

Just a final one for Bfd, so he can sob into his breakfast for the next few days as he realises he'll never see better than 1.5...

where in the settlement rns does it mention the $36million contract as a continuing asset? it was meant to be a multi year contract! if the contract had been more than the gifment which triggered the arbitration, GST would also have sued for lost profits too. they haven't...

the fact that the wife also owned the asset just makes it more stinky and a bit too circular! the best thing they can do is bring the arbitration to a close, get back their cash and divert it into supporting their reapplications for MICA and FCA pathways and stop themselves looking like, at best, chumps!

Bfd. treasury share ARE dilutive when transferred to someone say, for example, to buy an asset. theyre then 're-activated'. at that point the total voting count is added to, so the total is diluted.

they're only non-dilutive' as long as they're only held in treasury so... they have the choice to cancel them or use them for another asset buy. at that point they ARE dilutive... they're not magic, they have a value, it's how they were created!

as for the $36million contract, where does it show in the GST accounts? in the April '24 update they said the contract was "recognised prior to the consolidation of Semnet in the Group."

H1 revenue was only something like £2.23million'. SO WHERE WAS THE REVENUE FROM THE $36MILLION?!?!?

and what were ypsilon, a tiny singapore based company, with no reported clients doing purchasing NVIDIA servers delivered to???

the bs $36million contract was just used to create a bs IPO esitmate which, coincidentally, matched exactly GST's supposed valuation of their 66% stake in Semnet.

Give any evidence that the contract was fulfilled, that goods were bought and delivered and that it wasn't just used in some very dubious way to try and (probably) get the spike that was created to sell those treasury shares in the market and then to buy them back, with or without complicity.

it's a write-off and worth nothing. even the value of the treasury shares is now destroyed from when they were issued in the deal.

the reason the sp is where it is is because noone believes the Semnet story. forget it and forget your £2.50 targets. this will never be worth more than 1.5 unless they get MICA and stablecoin trail, at the very least.

While Chaebol posts many times on a subject he's goaded by rampers trying to 'add value' to Semnet.

the fact is Semnet is a bust... there's no IPO and there was no genuine £36million contract from Ypsilon. The embarrassment is them trying to save Semnet so the wife's asset still has some mnoetary value.

the shares could could well be reutned having benn 'shorted' with Zheng and choo having profited for the buy back.

the best bet would be to cancel those shares and keep the valuation of GST stable, rather than diluting them with more Treasury shares.

better to focus on the plays this week with FCA application and maybe MICA too. alternatively, see if they shift focus to south america. all of these will improve the sp... but talking about NASDAQ IPOs is just bllx. Semnet is worth nothing and the quicker folk appreciate that the current sp reflects that position the better.

All entirely possible. but i doubt they bought all the shares back from 0.45s so could even be a short term benefit if they have to buy more... a funny ol' short squeeze to get the full amount back to hand over. that'd be hilarious to see a scam give a short term bump in the sp!

Daresay that one will come around again!