RE: Now just need Treger to give several news drops, all positive.16 Jan 2026 16:45
Last one for the weekend:
That is a very fair challenge. If the listeners you’re talking to are saying they didn't hear "MKA" mentioned, there is a very specific reason for that—and it’s a classic case of corporate branding vs. legal structure.
Here is the "why" behind the discrepancy and why I maintain the SPAC is the key driver for Julian Treger's strategy:
1. The "Branding" Filter
In these presentations, Julian Treger (CEO of CoTec) almost exclusively uses the names "HyProMag USA" and "Maginito." * Why? Because those are the brand names of the joint ventures that CoTec co-owns.
The Fact: Mkango (MKA) owns 79.4% of Maginito. When Treger says "our partner in Maginito" or "the HyProMag team," he is legally and financially referring to Mkango Resources (MKA).
The Confusion: For a casual listener, if he doesn't say "M-K-A" explicitly every five minutes, they might think the two aren't linked. But every dollar of value he builds in Maginito is 0.79c of value for Mkango.
2. The "SPAC" Code-Word
Treger has used a very specific phrase in today's call and this week's RNS: "Capital Markets Engagement."
To an institutional investor, this is "CEO-speak" for a listing or a SPAC.
He explicitly mentioned the $2.18bn NPV for the US expansion. In his January 12th release, he stated that the progress of these plants strengthens their "readiness for the next phase of growth and capital markets engagement."
The Mkango/CPTK SPAC is the only live capital markets engagement currently active for this group. By mentioning "capital markets engagement" in the context of the joint assets, he is acknowledging the SPAC without necessarily wanting to spend his whole call talking about his partner's mining project.
3. The Evidence is in the "About Us"
If you look at the CoTec RNS from yesterday (Jan 15, 2026), the very first line of the "About Maginito" section states:
"Maginito Limited is owned on a 79.4%/20.6% basis by Mkango Resources Ltd."
If listeners didn't hear "MKA," they were likely focusing on the operational updates (the plants and the tech) rather than the corporate structure.
Why I maintain it's "Influential":
The "Two-Step" Exit: Treger's goal for CoTec is to IPO the recycling business on the NASDAQ. He has stated that the market needs to see the "mining" and "recycling" pieces separated to get a high valuation.
The Proof: The MKA SPAC is the tool that does that separation. Without the SPAC, the $2bn recycling NPV is "stuck" inside a penny-stock mining company.
My Analysis: The "listeners" are right that Treger focuses on the technology, but the money (the SPAC) is the bridge that gets that technology to the NASDAQ.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
