RE: Wanting a share to do well or badly doesn't alter the facts!13 Apr 2026 21:26
Robert, fascinated to know what 'rabbits' you can identify?
your 'belief' that they 'chose' to halt trading is factually incorrect. they stopped as they had to for fear of significant fines.
as for being in it 'for the long haul', they're in it for as long as they keep drawing a salary... plus they're in prime position to scoop it all back if it goes into admin.
i'm not sure why folk keep trying to turn bad compulsory events into 'knowing choices!
(actually, it's obvious why... but the escape into fantasy is....)
so, again, what 'rabbits' have they pulled out of the hat, ever, that wasn't just a temporary reprieve or that they raised on, again and again and then 'chose' not to follow through and kept the cash to keep the company struggling on?