Respect8 Jul 2023 23:50
There have been some people on these boards that are upset that GRH, as well as a few others, have built up (for want of a better word) a following, they have created for themselves a certain level of admiration for their knowledge and transparency amongst many other highly valued qualities.
Now in the instance of GRH, not only is his name known but also his address and he himself has highlighted his past successes.
To all those people that complain about GRH's (and other's standing within this community) it is not knowing your inside leg measurement or anything else of the like that is important. However gaining respect through detailing what you have acheieved in the past or simply answering GRH's questions would go quite some way to earning some respect, the level of respect earnt of course being directly correlated to your past successes, or even the fullness of the questions answered that have been posed.
To put things into context no one here is saying that GRH, KeithOz or anyone else is perfect, that of course is completely ludicrous, and if you find fault or failing (which is quite possible) within any of the valuations that have been proposed then everyone would love to know where errors that have been made so that more accurate calculations can be performed on the potential value of the company.
Of course, what could be more impressive than putting out there, in the public domain, in advance of any drill result the outcome of that drill, impossible you may say, well GRH has done that on, lets just say a few occaisions, perhaps the most notable being this post about GKP:
https://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/london/gulf-keystone-GKP/share-chat?page=5661&xref=chatnav_i_6_t
The following quote is taken directly from that GKP post:
"The technology works by examining physical changes at surface level...
changes in the manner in which vegetation performs when subjected to the constant barrage of chemical 'soup' emanating from the upward migration of hydrocarbons
(MICRO seepage...NOT please to be confused with seeps that are visible to the naked eye)...
and the effects upon the cementation of rocks where no such vegetation exists"
Now another point to note is that KeithOz mentioned HSSI, to which no one has asked what that acronym means (perhaps everyone knows), or its relevance, or even responded, so to help you out carjcarj you might want to take a look at the PDF at the following link, in particular pages 10 & 11:
https://fs.ogm.utah.gov/bbooks/2017/08_Aug/Docket/2017-020_274-02_Hewitt/2017-020_20170912.1_RespondentsExhibits.pdf
Hopefully the above information is of value to anyone trying to get theior head around what is going on and to those who critique the work that has been carried out without backing up why they are so critical. Those critical individuals should, hopefully understand, at least in part, why they are asked to back up their claims, answer questions that have been posed, or Foxtrot Oscar.