RE: Deal summary clarification13 Dec 2023 14:23
just back from a few blissful days with no internet access and came across this massive rns, a host of fascinating discussion and a few carping posts from individuals who have really become rather peripheral now.
when you see something almost too good to be true, you naturally look for the catch. is it that:-
1. we have not shown we can process low grade weathered oxide ores (as postulated by the domestic joker)? no. we are processing project m ore at sable, and have been for a while. small volumes, i accept, but profitably.
2. we can process the stuff, but cannot scale it up economically? no. we have proved we can do this with our similar chrome operations.
3. sable is a flop,failure, waste of money, useless (as postulated by brighteyes)? no. without sable we would not have shown we can get copper out of low grade ore in the first place and the whole zambian operation would have fizzled out. sable is ready for increased feed and runs the risk of being swamped. it is ready to produce cobalt hydroxide concentrate when/if market conditions improve.
4. the grades in the waste rock project are overstated. the 1.5% cu are just islets in an ocean of pointless rubble? i don't know, but we have been working on this for 4 years and irh are backing it. anyway, we will have a better handle on this within 60 days.
5. that there might be some hidden legal shennanigans, disputed ownership, historic claims (a situation not unknown to readers of the arc board)? seems unlikely. we have a 70 day cooling off period.
6. 30% is too little? *** packet calculations suggest even at 30%, revenue will be between 30 and 45 million dollars - more if price of cu follows expectations (not to mention 100% revenue from project m and roan). also, as i read it, jlp will be paid by the special vehicle to run the oufit - extra income.
7. that leon has overshot the mark? clearly not. interesting that in the podcast he emphasised the importance he attaches to this deal demonstarting to the market what we can do in a partnership. a slight change in emphasis, i feel, in which we take on a greater consultancy role. more of the same sort to follow.
9. that nobody thinks the timescale achievable? we have only a year to wait for an answer.
10. that the price of copper will crash/ebola virus/military coup/china invades taiwan/etc/etc? all out of our control.
i find it difficult to credit the mean spirited, self centred, grossly unseasonal, and disingenuous nature of some recent posts.
we have just bought about 3 million tonnes of copper for $0.00. surely time for the bulls and bears to hold hands and frollick along to stargates ********** bands. good tidings, i say.