Member Info for JODO

Tanz
I don't understand the logic here: LTH are just that, the short termers are not buying and selling their shares!
So, absent a big seller, they must be buying and selling off each other, with winners and losers equally. Unless you envy the winners' timing, they're of no interest to us. As wiser than I have said repeatedly, we need evidence of progress towards sales of gas to really shift this. That is closer than it was but who knows whether we are closer to the future 7p than the past 7p. We live in hope but focussing on short termers is just self aggravating.

How come none of these guys had a problem with Trump's tax cuts which also pumped trillions into the economy?

To those who know more about this: what is the risk of this materialising, as highlighted by OMJ from the half-year report?

"Aminex (LSE AEX) announced its half year report. Loss was $1.59 million /......./ New cash flow forecasts, however, indicate the requirement to source additional funding during the next 12 months and the company expects to source this via an equity placement."

NGR
I think your motivation is suspect.
You post hundreds of times on a share in which you have no stake offering advice to current holders.
For example, on 16 May, you posted no fewer than 26 times with the same essential message.
In one you specifically warn that the game is up and that we should sell up or lose the little we had left.
I had £1800 left then and the price that day was 0.70p: you can do the sums re what following your advice would have cost me, given that, even after today’s drop, my stake has more than quintupled.
I think you don’t qualify as a trustworthy financial advisor and should desist.

For quite a while now, this somewhat ill-tempered debate has rumbled on, on these pages - made all the more prominent by the absence of any other comments of much interest.
I don't know any of you personally but, going solely by what has appeared here over the last few years, I have seen no analysis and predictions which have stood the test of time better than Crusty's. And that's from someone who's bought from 1 up to 7 and back down to 0.5! I'm hoping that the super-optimists will soon be vindicated but history would seem to advise against too much anticipation!

The question mark (?) is important that to that thread title!!!

Jezzoo!

Mezzo
Primary bid is accessible to UK only; I’m out too!

This gives an independent view on the HUR debacle and the BOD's role in it.
I would say "I'm invested" if it were not now minuscule!
I don't trust McT and hope he resigns/is dumped; if not, I'll sell out of KMR after a dozen years!

The [UK] TimesToday 10:45
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hand-cash-back-to-complete-the-year-rlht5k5d8

Wind of change
Anyone might think Hurricane Energy’s imploding board was in line for a bung from the bondholders. Float the notion of a “side-deal” and a spokesman for the Aim-listed North Sea oil outfit declares: “It is truly ridiculous to even posit it.”

Apologies for being ridiculous. But at least bribery, which to be clear Hurricane strenuously denies, would have offered an explanation for the board’s bizarre behaviour over the past two months. Under chairman Steven McTiernan and chief executive Antony Maris, it cut a deal to all but wipe out the shareholders, giving 95 per cent of the equity to bondholders. And all to pay off just $50 million of a $230 million debt, due in July next year. On Tuesday, a High Court judge threw out the plan: the cue for the five non-execs to resign en masse.

Their plan was outrageous: a point driven home by activist investor Crystal Amber, with 14.2 per cent. Yes, Hurricane’s operations in the Lancaster field, the first to produce from a “fractured basement reservoir”, has had setbacks. And the debt must be repaid. But, whatever Hurricane says, there is nothing in the “directors’ fiduciary duties” to compel them into such a one-sided deal. Or for them to run up a ludicrous $17 million in legal and adviser fees pursuing it. Or for McTiernan to try to strong-arm shareholders into it with dark warnings that the alternative was “insolvent liquidation”.

Luckily, Crystal Amber put up a fight, calling an EGM that’s no longer needed to oust the non-execs. And the judge agreed that, with the oil price up to $75, there is a “reasonable possibility” the funding gap “could be bridged”. Two Crystal Amber nominees have now joined the board, one as chairman — even if Maris is still in post. And, yes, it needs to raise cash and strike a deal with bondholders. Even on shares up 29 per cent to 3.6p, it’s valued at just £72 million. But you’d expect a better deal without McTiernan and his cave-in crew.

Zag
I don't think there's much harm in posting pars from an RNS to highlight a particular point.
Probably better than paraphrasing it and certainly more informative than some of the comments here.
But, each to his own!

Vote!!

Has anybody with a DEGIRO account managed to bote?

Manyana
Ireland has compiled monthly rainfall data since 1711.
The decade 2006-2015 was the wettest until that point!
Looking out my window, I don’t think it has got much drier during the past 5 years.

Geng13
You may be right - odds on that the outcome will be similar - but that doesn't explain why you are so exercised about this, or what you think shareholders have to gain by taking your advice as opposed to trying to kick the BOD in the gooleys while leaving open the possibility of a minor miracle!
In late May you posted the same advice, more or less. Did you know that if you had ignored your advice and bought in then, you would have almost trebled your investment in 3 weeks?
If you return without acknowledging any of these questions, I will turn you green; I know that will upset you greatly??

Willec, Solar
If someone like Tuck is not invested and can give no plausible reason for posting continually, it’s best to block them after a reasonable interval?

DEGIRO
I have a transaction-only account with DEGIRO; voting is difficult.
Is there anybody else here with DEGIRO who can advise?
Thanks

Page and May
I don’t think ARA are responsible for producing Aminex’s accounts.
But it underlines Math’s point: with ARA doing the real work, surely the bureaucratic stuff could be produced on time!

RNS
Is this PM Question Time?
Are you just going o ignore the questions that were addressed to yo specifically?

RNS
6 per day for the past month on HUR with just a handful on other shares!

RNS
I can’t figure out why you’re working so hard to deliver your message here.
My shares are virtually worthless under the BOD proposal, and indeed they’re virtually worthless now also.
So you are not saving me from anything; it’s no risk to let my few hundred run in the hope that at least I can take a kick at the BOD which I think did not to what it could to at least reduce the shareholder losses.
Judging by what you say about yourself, you should have something better to be doing.
So could you please explain what you are trying to achieve with all this effort?