Member Info for jl5006

How can these be justified? Share price halved and still the ? remuneration committee considers it fair to allot huge share allocations at no cost to the highly paid who have had little success recently. Is this another casualty on the High St/ retail parks. My last two visits were not as expected. Staffed by youngsters - chef? didn't think to cook the extra chillies on the chicken dish. Have sold my holding. This was tip top with growing divis.

I think that is hearsay and not admissible in court - thence pure conjecture and in simple terms tosh.

II route was the only way forward given the 29 March deadline. Rights issue too drawn out. You may think - oh I know better - could have ??? The sop to PIs - don't be rude - EU rules. Small comfort. If you all listen to speculative press- and mooted placing at 10p - Why 10p? - they don't know - why should they - but they are just stoking resentment. It follows that if the placing is at 10p this would destroy the company. Then BHS, Woolworths and CVR Then it will not be long before your high streets are but low streets. When that happens you will not like it because the job you have and think is yours may just not there tomorrow. So is there a chance that holders can point to the positive. So easy to be critical and negative.

Here we go again. Nothing on the bottom line for this "leading mobile location data and intelligence expert" ??? yet options for Rae - 150ml @ 0.02p. Fine words and wishful thinking. Would not mind so much if the option price was 0.05 say. What this says is let the shareholders pay. Grant of options once there is a chance of profit - not before. Gravy train for BOD - who are on the way to outnumbering staff!

Another new entrant promoting LWC. All very well but is this helpful in current situation. Guess LWC is local. Mathew Clark - a national player. as QB says reiterating my thoughts - low margin. Look at the number of high street chains in difficulty - Oliver, Carluccio, Prezzo, Strada etc - When cash flow is an issue creditors have to wait. If these outlets owe money to CVR and they have become entrapped in downturn then CVR suffers.

Your woes about your supplies really don't help. You think you are helping the cause - not so in my view.

Rocca u may want your bonus ( ur royalties) and i am sure these will come through. You may have backed a loser at Chelt but u are among the many. The company is not (kaput as per muller) Fund your shortfall sensibly. People with difficult financial positions often scream from the rooftops - there is little any of us can do. Why abuse each other - is that gratifying. No look forward and see that together we can succeed but divided we will be like the labour party!

Wheeler 1 - thought you would never compromise. At least you have a stay on the English Riviera as a small consolation for your investment. Sadly Beverley Beaver and all those idiots who almost believed the Ironic postings are now without. I am one of those - one of the many. One of the pelicans escaped in the Durrels last knight. Was that the Digital Payments Division that did provide the income this company now now needs - needs a money tree - or bust.

I am a novice in the area of Swaps - and will always be - but the 6 ml sell (15/3 & 16/3) being the first 2 cash settled swaps on the JPM rns (their last disclosure) should surely have warranted a revised disclosure unless the 4.3ml buy and other matched the sell so that the voting right remained unchanged. What do we PIs know? A lot less than we need to.

Well ceteris paribus there has to be a rise soon. No stock has been so subjected to the robot. Only way is up.

It was u who said Bernstein tweeted. OMG u are a pratt - Bernstein was a columnist in the Observer - he died in 2002. Have a bad day and find your stone outside in the cold!!

Read the BB about B.B and all the rest. DYOR - rely not on the comments of others but have regard to what they say.

Your delivery was never in doubt. Now you can make more money!

Re your post yesterday. I have found an article in the Daily Echo in the Ringwood area which states that 20 Petrol forecourts were included with the 109 stores acquired by CVR in Dec 17..Net assets at Dec 16 c�21ml - so the �25ml paid seems not unreasonable. It is not beyond the realms of possibility that the 58p a ltr excise duty is the root of the problem �30ml. We shall see.

Not an issue in this scenario. Sadly these things happen

mattwales Interesting.. could be a pivotal point - depends on whether the sample you show is typical - i.e don't know how many petrol outlets associated. We all know petrol stations are mere tax collectors. Profit on petrol ??. How many hand car washes are there now - tens of thousands!

Demark Auditors have to - called Due Diligence. That is why I keep harping on about it. I was an auditor in a previous life.

Thank you for your inside info. I was simply suggesting that the WS Retail acquisition may have brought in some unsavouries onto CVR Balance Sheet. Muller2k - you would be a hard man to do business with. Do your customers say that you are charging too much?

Nobody has mentioned the acquisition. in Dec 17 - �25m - 109 stores under P & H. Palmer & Harvey in admin.What perils came from there. This should have been supervised by Internal and External Audit to validate assets and liabilities. Is this a source of part or all of the problem? Have you looked at this Demark - or do you just shoot from the hip?You say DYOR - I have done but have no answers. New CFO Moran ex Premier Foods!! As I said Premier, Spa, Costcutter etc all in the same boat

I guess that will be the end of you franchisees also. Palmer & Huntley -admin- Mathew Clark would have gone the same way- but for CVR. Look back at their accounts. Margins are so tight there can be no hiccups . As to D Hunter - she had the responsibility for the business and its growth. The CFO with the help of the Internal Audit section overseen by the External Auditors had the responsibility for internal control in particular financial internal control. It is easy to say its her fault. Whilst she is ultimately responsible, those with financial responsibilities are culpable. Who knows what went on in the boardroom. I am sure that margins will have to increase and that means prices will also. However if debt can be much reduced by a placing then with a lesser hit for borrowing profits will rise. Don't think McColls are in any great shape nor Premier and the others. Don't see vultures circling. GL to those persisting in holding- you can always filter This may be the gateway to greater change