Member Info for Jimzi

Linton. Correct.
I was merely making the point we have a contract enforceable in law. It will be superseded upon signing of a final contract (s)
I made no comment on damages beyond the intentions of both parties ( as evidenced by the largely completed draft contracts) will be taken into account, amongst other things, if damages were being sought.
So to reiterate, it’s not a conditional contract. Re jurisdiction, almost certain a clause stating jurisdiction of a more developed country would be agreed for obvious reasons - depends how good our lawyers are.
There would be compensation for loss of profits to some degree assuming we didn’t fook up, amount dependent the above and other representations which we holders have no knowledge about - sending over the king of scanning for example is a plus for us etc
See old cloth ears was up late winding himself up!
So are we all agreed we have a contract? ( that should keep a few occupied today!!)
And yes, I do have training

1) no it’s not conditional - you still don’t get it
2) your thick as you don’t bother or want to understand contract law. Sort of important in this company
3) just because lots of peeps don’t understand doesn’t make them right. We’d still be in the Stone Age with your neandithal thought process. Watch it when you get to Calais, you may fall off the edge of the world.
Did you see SFUs post- thought he was your mate

Quite. Complete disinterest in finding out the difference. You really look after your investment or do you just invest blind ? Either way, it’s sad in general and worrying for you

They have in the short term . Why don’t you do some research instead of writing legal opinions when clearly you don’t know the difference between conditional and implied contracts . You spend hours on this bb yet become more ill informed trying to denigrate the company based upon your legal view.
Why, if you hold, would you not try and find out whether I’m right or not and not merely dismissing a very important point in an instant in an off hand manner from , I assume, a non legal background . Prove me wrong and tell me your a contracts lawyer ! The difference between conditional and implied is massive.
Sad world of pride , bluster and simmering bitterness we live in.
Try and make some money this weekend

If you want an example of dumb the market can be, look at I3E today.
Mock all you like or use your noggin - matters not to me.

See OnlyGibbos post along with mine some days ago.

I3E - the power of an RNS into the close. Bloody lovely

Its not, its implied.
DYOR

"nowt materialising in ‘19 despite all that AGM guff."

We have a contract with MPS, thought as a holder you would be pleased and do some research; alas.......................

and you can plonk a good margin on the tech contract for the reasons I pointed out Re not having a transferable LC

Can shift 300k well over bid but NT to buy that.
Why? That reversed trade has fooked up their pricing algo.
Poor mms!!

!75k sell reversed.

Wise words from SFU at 12.14 over at STAR

commission, PTML levy and half the morning wasted

Brilliant.
So we have a list of numbers from 2p to 100p and your recommending buying and selling - think I'm getting the hang of this - forget the company profile and prospects.

Ha, there's the 175k buying back - you couldn't make this up

band of 2% traders are stuck now!

Mr 10k lost his bottle.

Why you can't sit on your hands for a day is beyond me.

Well the sellers this morning don't agree with you!!

Correct. It’s still pants unless they can pull out a mega one. 10p is foreseeable imo

You can post what you like.
Once the autos reduce, it will move. Could be days or weeks. This is an Isa share

It’s a blackie- just the counter trade to a derivative- could be either an opening or closing as made up of more than one individual trade.
Neutral trade as prices in