“Adherence to contract (or failure thereto) is a major barrier to foreign investment. “
So there will be no sp uplift with a formal signing in your view given the above?
SL have adhered - plus
MPS have invested £1.3b based on a contract and its up and running with what are minor issues.
Why will a poxy scanning and security contract fall by the wayside? especially as it’s part of a government Rev maximising campaign.
The market is this bb. ( cause it moves on low volume and we don’t have a wide shareholder base, ) hence where we are atm. It appears that most don’t even know we actually have an enforceable contract. Says a lot . And even more don’t understand letters of credit or read RNSs and jump on posts as wrong when explained. Bizarre actions when you have money invested and I assume would want to protect as best you can by wanting to gain knowledge Rather than immediately dismissing facts without basis or qualification- beggars belief imo
That’s why the “market” has got it wrong. It talks a lot and can’t be bothered to research and use a bit of basic business acumen to understand the position.
There you go you lazy bugger. Xeros expects to finalise a commercial agreement with Ramsons in Q4 2019 with garment finishing equipment which incorporates Xeros' technology to be available in the market by the end of Q1 2020.
Gross margin forecast is lower than actual. How does that work? And the RNS says CPX current manu costs are too high so they missed out on sales. Allenby eh?
See the delayed 2m odd trade at 9.47am - that buy caused the extended auction I mentioned. They had run out and had to go the remaining placees to re-load to keep some liquidity. Indicating we are very close if not actually in a square book position now.
More likely that at 1p, the mcap excluding cash is £2m!! If you can't see that's ridiculous for a licence based recurring revenue, high margin , low cost co in a climate change sector, spec savers advised.