RE: OOFT29 Sep 2022 17:14
Kingbilly,
I acknowledge that I nearly always post positive about chariot and that because I think they are doing the right thing and that they have audited proven gas volumes . I spent most of my career doing oil and gas and mining debt financings so I can see the risks and also see the steps that are required to mitigate those . Of course there is risk with a pre revenue company, but the fundamentals are very strong with the anchois project, but the market is applying an exploration risk premium to proven assets. So important to be patient with this share.
With regard to me only posting positive about chariot, here are my list of negatives.
1. Chariot should get a quote and market itself in Canada where natural resource assets are valued more properly.
2. The underwriting offer period for financing for the June 2021 financing was way too long and effectively stopped a rise in the share price, in my view, others may disagree.
3. Chariot have not explained to shareholders how it’s going to recognise revenue and profits from its renewable business.
4. Shareholders have no idea of the project nour potential, intuitively it feels like the right thing to do, but shareholders need to get an idea of what a realistic potential is here.
5. I disagreed with previous management exploration financing strategy, based on farm outs which did work, because the farm out market was terrible.
6. Chariot should purchase an interest in gas production to get immediate cashflow, reduce equity dilution risk.
7. Communication with shareholders needs to be more frequent, particularly as there are three pillars in the business there should be a good news flow.
Jimmy