Morning13 Dec 2015 11:47
KaChing
Interesting figures but I totally disagree that the sell off on Friday was due to any full analysis of the anticipated EBITDA and cash flow position of PEL.Yes it was not a well written RNS and there was nothing's in the projections to anticipate a significant rise in the SP and once many more recent investors/traders realised there was no quick spike they sold their positions.
There also likely to be a few long standing investors who sold/traded a proportion of their holding in order to buy back lower.In fact a rerun of events a few weeks ago when the disappointing results were released.
In summary AIM will reflect sentiment at any particular point in time and any movement up or down will be exaggerated which is what has happened.The fuller consideration of all the information ie your analysis,the TMST numbers,the RNSs, podcast,AGM and BOD statements on no dilution and the known and anticipated pipeline and the historical " understated confidence of PEL" rather than just the initial RNS will at the end of the day value the company.
My view FWIW is that the SP will recover over a period of time as PEL is a much safer bet than many on AIM as a profitable,revenue producing company with a great anticipated pipeline with no planned dilution.
Of course much of a posters perspective is governed by their own considerations and I am happy with everyones MOU as we choose to make money in different ways but as an investor rather than a trader I am more than happy to be here and consider that the SP drop was an overreaction rather than a true reflection of fair and full value.