Member Info for investor33

Doc back in the green box along with all the others.

I'm not ging to help him with his dopamine fix through engaging in his constant stirring and need to cause conflict and disagreement. He must be quite a bored person in ordinary life, and the constant dopamine releases when he is on here help him get through the day. Shame that so many on here keep giving him the responses which feed this addiction....

The best thing people can do to stop feeding what is very likely a dopamine addiction being experienced by the likes of Doc, Adw and SM is to cut off their dopamine fix through refusing to interact with them anymore.

They need conflict and stirring in general to fuel the release of the dopamine neurotransmitter. Right now people helping feed this addiction through constantly responding to them !

Doc just proving the point about what the article I just posted talks about...LOL.

If this Doc person did actually turn out to be invested as Wigster has claimed, then this article may explain his weird behaviour, as well as trollish behaviour in general on the internet ;

https://brili.com/blog/adhd-conflict-seeking-the-hunt-for-dopamine-in-negative-interactions/

I generally don't wish losses on anybody - however with the trolls I make an exception.

So I hope that SM has sold out of ORCP with massive losses.

Sorry ORCP holders - that last post was meant for the MATD board. Stock Maiden though is a troll on that board, so it's just him that I'm happy to see take a hit with the raise. Good luck to the rest of the holders.

Whoops - I accidently posted this on the ORCP board.....Purely an accident, as I have a policy of never commenting on other boards.

"So SM ( from what I hear as I filtered him yonks ago ) spends the whole Easter weekend talking about the "certainty " of an imminent raise for MATD, but then when the markets open today his beloved ORCP is down so far 21% - on a raise....

You couldn't make it up. It's simply hilarious.

It just shows how these detractors such as Doc, Adw and SM are living in a parallel universe. If they had been banging on for the last few months about how an ORCP raise was imminent, and what a trash stock it is, then they might have a degree of credibility."

So SM ( from what I hear as I filtered him yonks ago ) spends the whole Easter weekend talking about the "certainty " of an imminent raise for MATD, but then when the markets open today his beloved ORCP is down so far 21% - on a raise....

You couldn't make it up. It's simply hilarious.

It just shows how these detractors such as Doc, Adw and SM are living in a parallel universe. If they had been banging on for the last few months about how an ORCP raise was imminent, and what a trash stock it is, then they might have a degree of credibility.

It must be so frustrating for Doc that all the negative straws that he grasps at turn to dust, and he just ends up looking like a total fool.

Doc ; "And good point, BP. If we consider it’s taken 5 weeks and counting(!) just to get an e-signature on a cooperation agreement, it would likely take years for any JV or buyout to be completed."

A good example of how you spin everything negatively. Has it occurred to you that a JV or buyout may be precisely the reason why there has been a delay in the signature ? What's the point of the signing of a cooperation agreement if it's being immediately superseded by something else ?

- You thought that MATD wouldn't be successful with the land access consent - you were wrong.

- You stated that the recent granting of the Special Purpose 25 year designation was insignificant - clearly you were wrong, as I very much doubt that JV or buyout talks would be happening without it.

- You thought that a raise or consolidation might be imminent - so far you have been wrong.

_ You thought that the share price might fall below 1p - so far you have been wrong.

- You recently stated that the fall in the price of oil could mean that MATD might consider suspending operations at Heron. So far the oil price has strongly recovered from $59 to $67. Looks like you were wrong again.

Any further wisdom/predictions to share with us ? You've been grasping at every negative you can think of so far....

"DOC YOUR A IDIOT WHO HAS NOT INTEREST IN MATAD OTHER TO TRY UPSET PROPER SHARE HOLDERS DO EVERYONE A FAVOUR AND F*** OFF LEAVE IT TO PEOPLE INVESTED HERE AS CLEARY YOUR NOT"

Hear. hear !

CJ ; you timed it badly when you bought in - however you're not man enough to look in the mirror, and instead lash out and call the company ' a dog. '

People might have said the same kind of thing when Rolls Royce hit 38p in 2020 during the pandemic having bought in during late 2018 at around £3.60. There was talk about the company being nationalised at the time I seem to remember, just as you get people talking about MATD going bust today. There's a 2020 post which last time I looked is still on the LSE Trustpilot, in which the poster ranted abut people ramping a company which in his view ' is certain to go bust any minute ' Try reading it.

I don't think that they call Rolls Royce ' a dog ' of a share now though. And the smart people at the time were not obsessed with a 95% fall in the share price, but rather the likely prospects of the company going forward. it's called "a recovery play " and the real professionals know how to spot one based on improved fundamental prospects in the future, whereas the dabbling amateurs get their timing all wrong, and then moan about what they bought into.

CJ ; have you ever thought about complaining to the previous provincial governor about the delays ? Or the Chinese authorities for allowing a lab leak to cause a global pandemic ?

I thought not - just blame the company for everything...

Doc; it was a well established support level when the spike happened back in 2023. I'm not talking about post 2023. Support levels - like resistance levels - can be taken out. And often they are punched through quickly. Plus old support can become new resistance and vice versa.

All you showed with that comment is how ignorant you are about the subject - an ' oddball ' is someone who has no idea about price action, and about how a chart reveals visually price action. Doh...

Wigster ; glad to see that somebody else sees the importance of technical indicators. I had very sarcastic remarks from the likes of Doc and so called " professional " whenever I mentioned charts and technical analysis. Doc knows seemingly nothing about it - so in his eyes that makes me an ' oddball ' rather than him being ignorant. Lol.

I agree that the 50p share price is just a speculative figure plucked out of thin air. One may as well say 60p or 70p. I doubt if it's based on any particular calculations which would allow someone to arrive at an mcap which would entail a 50p share price.

To go through a well established support level, the price needs to punch through it with decent volume. That's why generally you see resistance levels being taken out with some force with a very large bar or candle. If there's not enough volume you get a rejection at the resistance level. People who were locked in at the resistance level are likely to sell when it reaches that price, so it needs decent volume to overcome this area of supply.

This principle applies to indices as well as individual stocks.

Wigster ; regarding likely future price targets - the most realistic indication is to look at a long term chart ( bar or candlestick ) and note where the previous resistance levels are. There are technical reasons why these are so important, which the average amateur investor generally has no idea about.

Anyway, all the financial insitutions and trading desks the world over are crammed with computers displaying charts based on technical analysis indicators. If you ignore charts then effectively you are ignoring price action - which is a particularly daft thing to do.

It was Doc who in a post ages ago called me an ' oddball' for talking about charts. Well maybe if he looked at charts and understood something about technical analysis then he wouldn't have invested in companies which have subsequently been delisted....With micro caps in particular, historical price action is all important.

Remember that time that time a few years ago when an RNS was released, and the MMs spiked the price down sharply at 8am from the 3.5p previous day's close ? Well it so happened that the bottom of the spike was 1.8p, which was a well established previous support level.

Wigster ; " However, the good news is that even if they offered a mere quarter of this amount we'd still be looking at 22p to 42.50p per share, which would certainly be fine for me - especially if we still had Gobi, Gazelle and Sunsteppe in the portfolio."

I would have thought that a quarter of WOS' valuation of the field wouldn't be too far off the mark....

Now on a PC, I will post that last one again ;

For the record, my list of preferred options in order of preference!

1) MATD sells the field at a decent price.

2) A JV agreement is entered into with a suitable partner, with the JV partner paying an upfront fee.

3) Petrovis increase their % ownership of the company through a shared issuance at or very close to the current open market price. This way the extra issued shares will not add to any supply in the near future so as to act as a handbrake on the share price, or contribute to any future price spikes. This extra funding would then act as an enabler for the development of further Heron wells. Institutions on the other hand will only buy in on a raise, and will demand a huge discount on the current share price in order to do so.

All of these options solve the issue of having to develop Heron with a cost per well of $4m. People who bang on about MATD not having the funds to develop further without significant share price dilution impacting very adversely on the share price have just never bothered to consider all the available options.

And as I've stated before on here, it's very important to also consider how many individuals and entities actually hold MATD shares - in reality it can't be very many at all.

If a large % of the shares are in very sticky hands, as most holders are thinking of an investment lasting several years, then that removes a large slice of possible future supply from the market. I doubt if there are much more than one thousand private owners of shares holding the remaining shares which Petrovis and the market makers don't own - that's a miniscule number compared to average mid and large caps.

For the record, my list of preferred options in order of preference!

1) MATD sells the field at a decent price.

2) A JV agreement is entered into with a suitable partner, with the KB partner paying an upfront fee.

3) Petrovis increase their % ownership of the company through a shared issuance at or very close to the current open market price. This way the Petrovis holding will not add to any supply in the near future so as to act as a handbrake on the share price or contribute to any future price spike.