Re Cerp and BPC8 Sep 2020 10:42
Everyone seems to think that BPC went to CERP about the merger. I do not think our BoD could think that far out of the box far too old school for this sort of thing. I think LK went to BPC. He knew that Columbus was skint and unable to do anything except give shares away and seriously dilute an already diluted holding, but he knew he had an asset producing well, not big and sexy but one that could serve a purpose and BPC probably had that purpose.
BPC is a binary asset that needed all its cash for this drill but would probably have started to eat up its cash reserves or some of it during this extended lock down period and hurricane season and the CERP assets with a little bit of help could as i describe "wipe the face of BPC" ie it could cover the day to day running costs of BPC. I would think LK suggested he could get his board to agree provided they were given the incentive to go away by means for a share issue probably instead of a redundancy package. So CERP serves a purpose, at the moment at least, as it will cover the day to day running costs at a time when i do not think there is any other income. Just my thoughts