Member Info for hunkymonkey

Well the markets are bouncing hard, very hard. I expected this yesterday tbh. Anyway..... Looking at rre, ars, avct, they all seem to be oversold and reacting with the rest of the market. You would imagine star should follow suit, this bounce isn't based on fundamentals. So anyone accumulating at these levels

Absolutely amazing times. Some people are going to make an absolute fortune! There are ftse100 companies that pay dividends that will also bag on your investment too!

Nor is it showing on nex, very strange indeed. Just watch out for the trade anyway, almost positive it happened. See how long it takes to show

I know someone who bought yesterday, transaction not showing. Strange for it to not show anywhere!

Wow, even for me there were loads of typos.

I'm not going to lie, one thing I did consider when finance was first mentioned was, how easy is it going to be for s small company like star to even obtain finance given there global markets. Finance is usually the first to tighten in tubes like this. After this drop though, coupled with the rumours. I do assume that they have something secured something. $1mln would be more than enough and should ensure reasonable terms

Sorry I know people only like positives, but there are going to aspects of star that will suffer in terms of revenue, given there world's financial crisis. I think zero bike sales is an obvious one to slow, not only in sales but production also. Cargo tracking with countries closing boarders and supply chain issues?? Think crop should see continued growth. With revenues forecast at $8-$9mln, do people think that that will be achieved overall??? General opinions for and against?

Based on Boris interview, ticked all the boxes for business. Let's see if it filters down?

The silly thing is, when a share is rising people slap each other on the back saying what a great buy, when they buy 250k @ 1.25p and make a quick 20%. Yet, when things like this happen, those same people get paralysed by fear when the company hit an all time record low. Surely now is the easiest time to buy if you believe in the fundamentals!

Notice someone after your buy out through a tiny sell to give the appearance of continued downtrend. Nice to know the true spread

I think that we've passed the point of no return, I cannot see any possible way that money would be raised at these levels by dilution. So for me, finance is the only option now (which ties to the general consensus). They've have ample opportunity to raise this year and have not to taken advantage, with what everyone knew was coming it would be a car crash. For their lack of communication, they do have integrity

The blame has got to start and stop with GL. The most frustrating thing here was, the liver toxicity was a known factor from the previous p3 trials. With pharma, if it's an unknown-unknown, you can take that, that's the risk. But when it was a known factor and not incorporated into the thinking with the trial design, that makes it nothing short of incompetent.

Even now I believe iclaprim could be a successful candidate in a diminishing arsenal of drugs, things could/should have been very different here. Ultimately, he just want up to the job.

The only thing moving quickly here, is the final nail in the coffin. Time to get what ever you have left and go and get a lunch

Don't worry, we have the cornerstone pi investors with outlays of nearly £200k, with those kind of holdings, I'm sure that they could throw (and should) say another £40k-£50k, as they have held for so many years so patiently, that should be a drop in the ocean. Whilst we wait, I understand that you say the bod "should" announce funding. No one has ever said that they "have secured", what has been said is they will try, and imo. I actually believe this to be true, they are trying, so I don't expect an rns, I would expect an interview to give the direction and show leadership to both the investors and wider market.

The BoD can and should be doing more right now. Stay safe and healthy everyone. I don't know about anyone else, but the virus is getting very close now. It seemed to circle my town, now it's confirmed in my estate

Ouch 0.82p print

0.903p - 0.975p, certainly offering value without question

Well if I was too mention tw and what he does, I don't think many would say there's too much conspiracy there. I have suspicions that something similar happened on echo, a slightly different tact though. I think it's quite commonplace on aim for this to occur. Obviously, no categoric proof, but when you piece it altogether, there's logic there, and at least offers rationale. I think people are drawn to aim generally, as it offers a tangible route away from their financial limitations and offers hope. I suspect that the "select" have a continuous cycle of new bate to increase their holding from. I've spoken to people who've been at a total of their holdings, to scared to sell, too scared to buy. Take now for instance, let's say someone has (a claimed) 8mln @ 2p = £160k investment. You'd assume they're a multimillionaire, would it not be worth sticking another £60-70k in down here? Yes. They don't, as it doesn't fit the trading strategy they took in which to get there.

I've been thinking about star after yesterday. I was thinking about the trading on it over the years. People are quick to blame factors like corrupt/sneaky mm's, shorters or people not holding. I've never heard people say sneaky mm for putting a sell on nex

As I've been in star many years I and believe that it's nothing to do with any of the above. I think that there is a few select group of posters/holders with large holdings who trade this aggressively. How do you trade an illiquid share?

You drip drip drip information, making others feel like they are ahead of the curve, encouraging them to buy whilst the larger holders sell and then buy back. Only margins but over years it has a huge effect

I think this is the case, as it's not easy accumulate 5-10mln (£100k-£200k at the claimed average) of shares. Especially in an illiquid share, without having an immediate impact on sp.

I've also worked in finance selling investments to seriously wealthy people, and people who have that wealthy don't get there by locking up money in high risk shares for years and years. I remember someone being asked, why don't you want to go over 3%? because I want to keep my anonymity. I think it was so others didn't know when they were trading?

It's clever, "the select" are extremely positive consistently, anyone saying anything other is a deramper or has an agenda. Trying to get people to buy, because of a drip drip drip of into, followed by positivity? Then there's a drop, the above trading strategy could explain.

In the meantime, what's left are large groups of holders with overweight holdings at high averages, why? Because they've paid for the larger holdings of the "select", and when the company does come good, guess who gets the greatest benefit?

Thanks