Member Info for hunkymonkey

From a technical standpoint - yes. You put about perhaps not needing a raise, if so, then definitely

1.02p printed today. Lowest in history. Never say never

https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2513846A1/en

In relation to the patents discussion, , I decided to research it. This has a wealth of technical information, along with citations.. Tbh it's too much for one person to go through, put some very very interesting references

Excellent well thought out factual post GLR, time will tell, the next rns should reveal all. If financials are fine, as well as cash position. I concede that a rerate would be in the cards. Ps.... I've found something very very interesting for the rampers!!!!

For me the the best partnership affiliation is lokies, specifically the Russian one. The problem with Bosch, is they've built their own back office so no SaaS payments will be received, therefore the profit is only on hardware, it would have to be a huge deal (likely with dilution, to get it through). The cropx and zero deals, to me, they are kind of the reverse, not much profit on the hardware, but over time and compound selling, the profits increase over the years. For me the lokies has the potential for the best of both worlds, and if the distributor manages to got their £2mln sales target, then jobs a good one! The latter is an instant game changer for me. Sorry for a balanced view

So clearly, nobody actually knows about the patents of the tech. Interesting.......

I agree with both of these posts, time to deliver

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/CPX/cap-xx-limited-us-court-action-settlement-and-licence-agreement-nhvzu4h1tb9jtif.html the importance of having good patents.

https://patents.justia.com/assignee/starcom-gps-systems-ltd

Genuine question for the page. I've spoken to someone about star, who is quite versed in tech companies.

Does anyone know the IP rights and patents that starcom have over it's products? It's not fair to publicly post what I was told, as I've been unable to verify either way. Has anyone looked into this?

So let's get this straight, you can give the same old rhetoric that this will X10 bag, this is a transformational yr, zero sales 10000 blah blah, but you're not actually allowed to try and pull that apart. You say troll for trying to critique and look at the fore and against. If you refuse and only talk positive, that either makes you a 10% trader, charts tell you there's enough, or desperately recouping a loss.

Take the zero deal, $3 per month 10000 at the end of of the year, I use crude compound sales but at the start of next year, if they achieve those sales is $30k per month, or $360,000 per annum. Plus the profit of the sensors in the bikes, which we don't know. So the deal is good for the long term, but not company defining, yet the people whom are underwater would like to pretend otherwise.

I've said it before, yes, but with done of the industry leading products on the market, they should be doing better than what they are.

Works both ways, refusal to accept and discuss both sides of any company Pro and con is a naive investment

Just remember - itsgambling and the crew have one goal here. A higher sp. They will keep on and on, repeating themselves, trying to rise the sp because they want to repeat the cycle of the last 12 months and sell at 15% profit and buy back (because obviously people are - fact) Personally I've done my research and am very comfortable with my investment. And I'm now even more comfortable thanks to the appearance (on this tiny microcap) of these rampers. There must be a big prize around the corner, to warrant so much of their time here.
GLA
HM

So absolutely no concerns or issues on any front? Amazing that for a company with no down side or issues, is valued at £4mln. Easier to say that clearly the market missed something. Yeah, that's it, it's the markets fault.

I understand most people only want to talk about the positives, but $300k before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation.

Rather than saying market has missed something, try looking at it the opposite way, say maybe the market "knows" the bod are trying to raise cash.

I like this rns, adds some detail as a gauge. $200k last year and "significantly more" this year, okay that could be $300k-$400k. But a positive start to the year and an improvement on detail

For clarity, I'm here because of the products, I like the bods track record, but think they have to answer some questions about the products implementation

For clarity, I'm here because of the products, I like the bods track record, but think they have to answer some questions about the products implementation

In truth, I don't really believe that there African payment slip was anything other than a slip. It can happen to any company, especially when dealing with African money. A very lucky slip mind, as if it hadn't, last year's revenue would have been very poor. Which is why the bod need to stand up and be counted, they need to deliver.

Thank you for your response. In truth, I want people to pick apart everything I've put, destroy it! But in any fast moving tech industry, unless to ram home what you've got, others will eventually catch up and take over. That's the nature of the beast.

Also cristals situation actually highlights what I've been saying. Regardless of any individuals situation, whether, profit, even or loss. I think that you should be looking at where the company is as of today, what has gone wrong, what's gone right and what needs to change.

You are absolutely right about the AGM, hopefully see you there. As for ii, with an mcap of under£5mln, it will be difficult for ii to invest. Imo the bod have to deliver first

Absolute nonsense indeed!

picking it apart to find the negativity every single time. This is called being critical, opening a debate both for and against to analyse what is going on. Surely that is better than saying, corrupt mms! Shorters! Undervalued. If people think things are wrong, open up a reasoned debate, use facts and say why. As opposed to, "filtered"

"that but if you spend your time hammering the company here and then have to ask why there is a negative feeling from AIM toward it". This is an interesting one, as actually addressing all the negatives helps people decide and come to an informed decision. If I have specific concerns, do other prospective investors?? Unfortunately, people shout deramper etc, why is that? Reason... They can't offer a reasoned debate to answer. Ultimately, I think that bod have done a poor job at implementing their fantastic products over the past few years. That's a major concern because, other companies will catch up and dilution will screw current investors