Member Info for Howey1927

Benny, today has been far busier than most BOIL days on here and I like it. Let's hope that egos are over looked and that a deal can be struck.

Exciting times ahead.

If you all imagine that every time Scot says 'Fact' to the tune of Shaft, it's pretty cool.

Hi Scot! I trust this message finds you seething?

Firstly, you credit RKtech with a detailed and fact-led' response. We all know you struggle with the concept of a fact so I'll gloss over that but what detail are you crediting him with? Awesome!

Then, what is your issue? Aren't you making a killing over at the mighty PANR?

You clearly take issue with the fact that we own part of PANR's discovery (I look forward to you quoting one of your facts) but also that for some reason, despite 88e not yet having a producing resource, it's got a pretty impressive MCAP.

Can you imagine how the blood vessels in your temples will bulge when Merlin comes good? Can you please share a photo?

Keep the essays coming because I suspect the time you waste is impacting you way more than anyone here.

Go 88!

There were only 26 trades today. That's driven either by lack of interest or lack of available shares to buy. I agree with you, Mirasol, that the share price is surprisingly low at present but that was caused by the placing and there's been no significant news since to get it moving back up. Once we get news of either gas flowing or details of the bidders emerging, this will shift upwards.

Progress is being made towards gas and that will in turn be of interest to potential bidders.

I am still confident here.

GLM

Mirasol, if the situation you describe happens then I expect, as a shareholder, that ANGS refuse any offer and produce gas at SFB. Then once, up and running, the other parties may reevaluate and others may take an interest. The situation you describe, is almost as though when an offer come in, we HAVE to accept it and that is ludicrous!

Also, why would the other interested parties wait for SOU or even care about what SOU does? Putting a positive slant to counter your negative one, SOU nipped in quickly (without even getting an NDA in place) and put in a ridiculously low offer to try to get ANGS/SFB on the cheap. They failed. The other more sophisticated parties are looking at the full picture and will put in a reasonable offer that is good for their shareholders but also that sees them in with a good chance of ending up with the prize.

I have no idea how accurate my version of events is but I strongly suspect it 's closer than yours which is simply designed to put a negative spin on this!

GLM!

Play nicely children!

Progress is being made. I'm not convinced by Taverham's timelines as I think gas will flow sooner. Not doubting your technical knowledge (I know Sh-1t) but I suspect your motives aren't quite right. I'll hold my hand up if I'm wrong, of course.

This will come good in my view.

GLM

There you go using your favourite word again scot! Where is the fact, or lack there of in what rfarfa said? And to correct what I said when responding to some of your BS 'facts' the other day and that I would check them if you actually made one, if something is truly 'fact' it doesn't need checking.

But the 'facts' you spout do need to be checked, if not laughed at.

Go away and take Cbaron with you.

Morning chaps.

Or is it a paperwork error? I agree, it seems a strange one.

Thank you Taverham.

Morning Team! Good to see we are all getting along as usual!

Whilst I agree that HITS has nothing positive to say about ANGS, I also think he makes some valid points. I watch the way ANGS go about things and I often get the impression that it's me calling the shots (leave things to latest possible moment and hope to blag my way through)!

Further photos added to Twitter this morning to show more progress being made (Yanis and Taverham care to give their view on this?).

One thing though HITS, your comment about 'how much gas and by when', the when bit is applicable to ANGS but not necessarily to any would be buyer of SFB/the company. Obviously sooner rather than later but it's coming. They've shared a lot of positives, that were sadly outweighed by the raise (HITS called that one at the point when the GM was called when many of us either didn't believe or didn't want to believe it was coming.).

Somewhere in the middle of the 'total blue sky' and 'pits of despair' views is a commentary that will enable would be investors (that's not you is it HITS?) to make a balanced and informed judgement.

GLM

@Scot, do you know what 'fact' means?

Last one I'm posting to/about you as you are deluded. You post a short essay on the chance of success based on assumptions you have made and try to fob them off as facts! Then you claim that PANR own 90% of the new oilfield (based on PANR's presentation) but then go on to say that analysts will doing a comparison. It might, just might be that 88e will do some analysis of the acreage and overlap rather than just taking PANR's word for it.

Perhaps someone will fact check you when you provide some!

https://twitter.com/angusenergyplc

GLM

@Scot, thank you for reminding me you also have a beef about that fact that Reddit gave us a great leg up last year.

I still don't understand what your point is and why you have an issue with 88e when PANR are 30% up today. Why are you trying to get the attention of people who clearly don't want to enter into conversation about you weird and whacky theories? You'll say it's because you have the 'facts' but you don't do you? You quoted what the PANR Management believe the overlap is but when Blackadder quoted what 88e management believe, he was lying! Hardly discussing facts are we?

I've bitten my tongue for too reading your strange rants for too long so I weakened and responded to you but I won't anymore as I feel little better now.

I wish PANR well as I am grown up enough to wish others success but also to see that what is good for them is also good for 88e.

Now go celebrate and leave this board alone.

@Scot, the only person who has mentioned most of the resource being south of the border is you! Are you worried that it might be the case?

I suspect so. You only reared your ugly head on here (just guessing there as you might be a stunner!) when talk of shared resources started. The amount of resource either side of the border won't be agreed by you telling people to go to Specsavers! Why don't you go back to the PANR board and discuss the great success, rather than coming here to ***** and moan?

Just an idea.

Who are you Gideons? Clearly a second account.

I would never cast any doubt on you Brom but it just feels like there are a lot more people holding back awaiting the permit. Maybe I wasn't paying attention last year!

Ddraig, you're right that the permit hasn't caused a sharp increase in share price previously but then again, I don't recall anywhere near as much fuss about it being approved before.

There will be some movement on positive news I believe.

GLA..

Bridge, I commented similarly yesterday. I think it's a means to suggest more is going on than just an overspend at SFB. I feel a question on the website coming on!

GLM

Highroller, it was a friendly suggestion that you don't land yourself in potential bother. I agree with much of what you say. I wish you well, hence my original post to you.

Don't reply. Just ignore him/her or filter.