Member Info for Hotfinance14

Playtime..the bottom live with SC is that if you don't fit his agenda you are a trader idiot etc. I take it all a pinch of salt.

The RNS regarding Sparkle states :

'The parties are now jointly planning the next steps towards confirming commercial supply arrangements for Sparkle and fuel permitting in Panama.'

Does anybody know what these steps would be ? I assume the permitting is required by ASEP as this is a new fuel in Panama.

Dustof...you would think JM has simiar skills/knowledge to Peter in relation to the Morocco project if not more. I am sure they will both discuss the project at length and obviouslyt it will not be a knee jerk decision. When your kit has been on site for 10 months you have to ask OCP if they have nothing concrete in relation to the start date of the trial they should consider pulling out.

Totallly agree Vince.

Regarding Morocco I woukld tell them if the trial does not start this yeear we are pulling out. Our kit has been on site for 10 months already.

Looks like the rise in the SP will continue but I think 5p is ambitious.

Do we know how much fuel Sparkle use annually ? I don't recall it ever being mentioned.

SN88..you are better than that.AI is not always 100% accurate.

I recall the cost saving is about 10% for Sparkle. These trial results should open new doors in Panama plus I hope they send the results to OCP so they get a move on.

Fantastic news. Let's hope a commercial agreement is completed soon.

SC...Can you give an example of the inside information you think they woukd get ? Maybe JM is on a yacht to Utah to collect a barrel of oil.

'Do you really think he'd take up such a position knowing that kind of uncertainty.. he'll have an excellent angle on what's to be expected in due course..'

Duprophey..Can you give me an example of what uncertainty Peter would be told that we do not know of ?

Good to see further media in relation to our new CEO :

https://splash247.com/quadrise-names-peter-borup-as-ceo/

AKHM...He told us they would be signed very soon months ago!!! The bottom line is Peter would not have been told anything signicant that we do not know. If there was any significant progress there would be an RNS.

Devon..So do you think AM said to Peter don't tell anyone and sign this to confirm you won't but i can confirm to you the bilateral agreements will be signed very soon. Oh and Peter before you go the yacht is ready to go to sea.You are very naieve ol boy.

'Indeed! Quadrise would hardly appoint an "Experienced leader in the shipping industry" as CEO if there was any doubt about the MSC trial going ahead, and he would want assurances of that before he agreed to join.'

At the interview Peter would have been told no more than what we have regarding the MSC trial.

Dustof....Peter would have done his background research before the interview.

Their should be an IMC after the final results this month so I would expect our new CEO will be on the call. I wonder if he will be broadcasting from Tivoli world. Copenhagen is a wonderful city.

An excellent apppointment. 57yr old Peter is Danish and will have a different mindset to our previous CEO's where I am sure he will not give out over ambitious timelines. This is what we needed and could well be the game changer of the business.

AKHM..If you read the RNS's this year they explain what 2 agreements are outstanding.

It states they are awaiting the results from the OEM.One woul;d expect that for the OEM to get results they need to do some testing.