RE: George's funding short term26 Jul 2023 11:01
In my opinion we have the following scenarios
1. canmax stick with us, friends again the 5 billion headroom is not required and not used though may still be another smaller raise to cover short term costs
2. canmax walk away but we get a new offtake partner in time who pay off canmax loan, the 5 billion headroom is not required and not used
3. canmax walk away and we do not get a new partner in time, so we have to use the 5 billion headroom to pay them off - this may only end up being a part payment, but this would be enough to keep them happy till new offtake is finalised
4. canmax walk away, we do not get a new partner, the headroom is not enough to pay the debt and we are all officially screwed
see no blind faith, just showing the possible outcomes and whichever outcome you believe will happen - we still need the headroom as an option and therefore your simply must vote yes
Unless of course you believe in option 4 in which case wtf are you even doing here? Kindly bugger off and leave us to it